Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines     

IEEE supports EWC’s 802.11n proposal

Jan 20, 2006 11:12 AM

As expected, an IEEE task force yesterday unanimously voted in favor of the 802.11n draft standard offered last week by a joint-proposal team led by the Enhanced Wireless Consortium (EWC).

Although the 802.11n draft probably will not be ratified as a standard for about a year, industry observers have said they expect products based on the draft version of the standard to appear on the market this summer.

The 802.11n standard is expected to generate maximum data throughputs of 600 Mb/s, making the wireless transmission of even high-definition video content between devices possible. In addition, the range of 802.11n is expected to be much greater than current Wi-Fi standards—up to 1500 feet—and the new standard will be designed to operate at unlicensed frequencies in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands.

IEEE’s vote on the next-generation Wi-Fi standard effectively brings a close to a saga that has unfolded during the past year. After two groups—TgnSync and WWise—failed to garner enough support for their proposals to keep the standards process moving, large chipmakers led the creation of the EWC, which became a point of consensus.


Acceptable Use Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus

ONLINE SHOWCASE

Get vendor information in this special online showcase.

WHITE PAPERS

Download these new free public safety white papers from Motorola.

E-NEWSLETTERS

Check out our latest edition of Urgent Communications Today and Tech Talk. Not a subscriber? Subscribe now!

Hot Spots

Project 25

Interoperability

Rebanding

PSAP

Essential Reading

A corner turned

Let the buyer beware

When measurements aren't feasible

Verizon, AT&T both plan 2010 launch for LTE networks

Motorola shuffles the deck

Most Popular Articles

GAO report casts dark shadow on GPS

New York City's new broadband network could be model for first responders

Tower Shadowing: Friend and foe

A Big Voice in the Big Apple

Making Twitter work for public safety

Browse Back Issues