https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

NG-911


News

APCO officials stress need for NG911 interoperability

APCO officials stress need for NG911 interoperability

  • Written by Donny Jackson
  • 4th September 2019

Next-generation 911 (NG911) systems should let 911 centers handle all forms of multimedia—voice, text, data, photos and video—and interoperate with other NG911 systems, but public-safety jurisdictions have to specify these characteristics in their procurements or risk facing disappointment and extra costs, according to APCO officials.

Jeff Cohen, APCO’s chief counsel and director of government relations, said that many state and local jurisdictions are seeking bids from vendors to deploy Emergency Services IP networks (ESInets), but most procurements are not requiring interoperability with neighboring jurisdictions or mention interoperability as an afterthought. Most procurement documents are being written by vendors or consultants, and “they all look the same,” he said, noting that an objectives-based approach would be more effective for public safety.

“Don’t take this as a knock on the vendor community at all—it’s just the way it’s been,” Cohen said during a presentation during the APCO 2019 event in Baltimore last month. “We’ve got to reverse this. You’ve got to tell, as public safety, what are your objectives and put them in your RFP. [State in procurement documents,] ‘This is what I want. If I get a photo from a citizen that I serve, I want to be able to seamlessly send it to the 911 center across the river.’

“This approach stresses objectives like interoperability over compliance with particular standards. You should list standards in your RFPs, but make sure that you put in your objectives.”

Jay English, APCO’s chief technology officer, delivered a similar message about the importance of multimedia support and secure interoperability, emphasizing that requiring a 911 system to be interoperable is not the same as requiring systems to be interconnected.

“’Interoperable’ and ‘interconnected’ are different—they’re just different enough that it matters,” English said during a separate session at APCO 2019. “Interconnected means one network can talk to another. Interconnected has been around forever; phone networks are interconnected. It’s a legacy term that’s been used in telephony for years.

“Interconnected does not mean interoperable. Interoperable means [the system] can share data seamlessly, regardless of vendor, regardless of jurisdiction. Interconnected means that these two networks are connected and they can speak to each other, but they don’t have to speak the same language; interoperable does. You need to use that language.”

English also emphasized that public-safety agencies should structure procurements in a manner that encourages bids from vendors that leverage cloud, i3, IMS and virtualization technologies to provide “innovative approaches” to NG911.

“Don’t be afraid to talk to those folks,” English said. “They may not be the biggest vendors out there; in some cases, they may. But invite innovative approaches. Just because it’s never been done before doesn’t mean that it’s not the right way to do it now.

“Because, if we keep doing it the way we did before, what are we going to get? The same damn results that we’ve always got.”

And those results typically have been less than ideal for public safety, with vendors often providing solutions that meet the standards requirements outlined in procurement documents without delivering the kind of functionality that 911 officials envisioned when the bid process began, English said. To achieve the vision, 911 centers often are told that they will need to spend additional money to purchase new interfaces or conduct interoperability testing—a situation that has become familiar in the legacy 911 environment, he said.

“It’s not a technology issue,” English said. “It is an issue of what we ask for and what we make the vendor community provide. They are very smart folks, and they can build really cool stuff, but we have to tell them exactly what we need. It has to be specified, and they have to be tied to it, either with service-level agreements or contractual language that says, ‘I expect interoperability, and this is what I expect interoperability to mean.’

“Because, if you leave it open to their interpretation, you’re going to be building a lot of interfaces, a lot of APIs and doing a lot of interoperability testing to get what you thought you were getting to begin with.

Such procurement and development cycles need to be avoided with next-generation 911, so public safety can benefit from economies of scale, instead of making purchasing decisions based on the unique needs at each of the more than 6,500 public-safety answering points (PSAPs)—or emergency communications centers (ECCs)—according to English.

“Bottom line … we can’t afford to build another system the way we built the last [911] system, which is proprietary, 6,500-plus different ways,” English said. “As each individual emergency communications center, we have to be able to get what we need out of the system, but we can’t do that 6,500 different ways. And, when it comes to cybersecurity, you certainly can’t secure it 6,500 different ways.

“There is one common denominator for all emergencies … They are all local. You have a right, as a local agency responsible for those emergencies—regardless of scale—to ask for what you need. Don’t settle for what someone else thinks you should get. That’s the bottom line”

This is particularly important at this juncture, when first responders in the field are leveraging FirstNet and other public-safety-focused broadband technologies in the field, English said.

“If we don’t implement next-gen [911] the way we’ve talked about, it doesn’t matter what FirstNet does, [first responders will] never get that data—they’ll never see it,” English said. That’s one of the reasons it’s so darn important that we get this right.”

Cohen echoed this sentiment, noting not only the development of broadband technologies used by both first responders and the citizens they serve.

“You’ve got responders with broadband networks from FirstNet and other providers,” Cohen said. “You’ve got citizens like you and me that have what we have—totally interoperable. And then you come down to the 911 center, which doesn’t even have the level of technology to match, let alone everything being interoperable.”

With this in mind, 911-oriented organizations like APCO, NENA and NASNA worked together to help craft the language used in bills that would provide $12 billion in capital funding to help 911 centers fund the transition to NG911, Cohen said.

Standalone NG911 bills have been introduced in both the U.S. House and the Senate, and the NG911 bill language also is part of a massive infrastructure legislative package that has been introduced in the House, Cohen said. An interoperability requirement is one of the key components of this NG911 legislative language, he said.

“This is something that we’ve been stressing,” Cohen said. “As a matter of fact, each grant application is going to have to certify that they would meet this [interoperability] definition and maintain it. And, if they do not, even after receiving the grant funds, they would have to forfeit the money back.

“That’s how important we feel it is. That’s how important our partners at NENA, NASNA and other associations felt it was. And that’s how important the sponsors of this bill felt it was.”

Even with the proposed $12 billion in federal funding, the current NG911 proposals would let state and local governments maintain control of the 911 system while applying for the federal monies via a grant program, Cohen said.

Two other key components of the current NG911 proposals are that states would be required to establish and maintain a sustainable funding mechanism for 911, and language prohibiting states that raid 911 funds from receiving NG911 grant funding—a tactic that has been tried before, albeit with very small amounts of federal 911 funding at stake, according to Cohen.

“This would put a stop to it [states raiding 911 funds], I think, unlike before,” Cohen said. “Because, if you’re going to lose at the state level hundreds of millions of dollars [in federal 911 grant money] if you don’t stop diverting, I think that’s enough money to finally stem that practice.”

Cohen acknowledged some of the political challenges associated with trying to get NG911 funding approved by Congress, which is deeply divided along partisan lines and will be distracted by 2020 election campaigns in about six months. It is important that public-safety representatives stop making claims that their 911 centers already have implemented NG911, “which is not true anywhere—especially under this [legislative] definition,” he said.

“If there are people out there saying, ‘We already have next-generation 911,’ well, if I’m a member of Congress, I’m going to say, ‘Why should I vote for this bill? Why do you need the money?’” Cohen said.

 

Tags: homepage-featured-4 APCO Cybersecurity Dispatch/Call-taking Federal Government/Military Funding Interoperability NENA News NG-911 Policy Public Safety Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet Regional Coordination State & Local Government System Design System Installation System Operation Tracking, Monitoring & Control News

Most Recent


  • Malicious Python Repository Package drops Cobalt Strike on Windows, macOS & Linux systems
    Public repositories of open source code are a critical part of the software supply chain that many organizations use to build applications. They are therefore an attractive target for adversaries seeking to distribute malware to a mass audience. The latest case in point is a malicious package for distributing Cobalt Strike on Windows, macOS, and Linux systems, […]
  • T-Mobile's CEO explains the company's new private 5G strategy
    T-Mobile on Monday took the wraps off its new private wireless networking offerings, and the company’s CEO spoke about it at length during an investor event. “CIOs everywhere are interested in this topic right now,” T-Mobile’s Mike Sievert said Monday at the J.P. Morgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference. “And they’re interested in it for a reason. […]
  • Hytera, Motorola Solutions refile appeal, cross-appeal in civil case
    As expected, Hytera Communications again has appealed a $543.7 million judgment against it to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, while Motorola Solutions this week filed for second time a cross appeal in the case that was initiated more than four years ago. There was little surprise in the filings, because both Hytera and Motorola […]
  • Amid shifting workplace expectations, local government employers must adapt
    Constrained by inflexible budgets, local government employers can’t compete with the lucrative salaries offered in the private sector. And while recruitment has always been a challenge for public employers, the last two years have been especially difficult. From January 2020 to the same month this year, government organizations lost around 600,000 jobs—more than manufacturing, wholesale […]

2 comments

  1. Avatar Steve O'Conor, ENP 9th September 2019 @ 12:35 pm
    Reply

    Jay makes a good point, and clarifies the distinction between interoperability and interconnection. Most RFPs for NG9-1-1 systems require compliance with NENA’s i3 standard. By universally adopting this industry standard and complying with its specifications, interoperability will be achieved. That is the nature of a “standard” – both speaking the same language. If competing standards are adopted – speaking different languages, to use Jay’s term – then an interface (language translator) between the two is required to achieve interoperability.

    NENA’s i3 standard uses the IETF’s Session Initiated Protocol (SIP), as SIP is the internationally-accepted method to convey multimedia communications. If the originating network (wireless service provider, for example) or destination network (legacy PSAP, for example) does not employ SIP on their end, the i3 locution uses a Protocol Interwork Function (PIF) to “translate” from one to the other. Of course, to eliminate the need for translation it would be far better if both origination and destination networks used SIP natively.

  2. Avatar Walt Magnussen 25th September 2019 @ 9:55 am
    Reply

    Amen Jeff, Well said. Between APCO, NENA ATIS, IETF and the IEEE hundreds of thousands of hours of committee work have been spent on the development of these standards. These efforts will reduce cost, enhance functionality and ensure reliability but only if we adhere to them religiously. The ability to support multi media from any device to any call center anywhere is getting closer every day.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • APCO encouraged by legislative progress of bill to reclassify 911 telecommunicators
  • APCO officials stress need for NG911 interoperability
    APCO criticizes portions of NENA E911 report
  • APCO officials stress need for NG911 interoperability
    APCO conference highlights public safety communications problems
  • APCO: Jeff Cohen makes case for public-safety telecommunicators' job to be classified in protective services category

Commentary


LTE and liability: Why the fire service must move forward with digital incident command

  • 2
6th May 2022

Partnership and collaboration must be the foundation for emergency communications

18th April 2022

FirstNet success means no hypothetical ‘shots’ need to be fired, Swenson says

22nd February 2022
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Malicious Python Repository Package drops Cobalt Strike on Windows, macOS & Linux systems dlvr.it/SR0Qb2

24th May 2022
UrgentComm

T-Mobile’s CEO explains the company’s new private 5G strategy dlvr.it/SQyzhc

24th May 2022
UrgentComm

Hytera, Motorola Solutions refile appeal, cross-appeal in civil case dlvr.it/SQxNX1

24th May 2022
UrgentComm

Amid shifting workplace expectations, local government employers must adapt dlvr.it/SQwVVs

23rd May 2022
UrgentComm

The private-wireless networking opportunity shouldn’t stay too private dlvr.it/SQw7MT

23rd May 2022
UrgentComm

Europe’s first driverless-car test completed dlvr.it/SQvqyY

23rd May 2022
UrgentComm

FCC approves order to modernize priority-service rules dlvr.it/SQmSN0

20th May 2022
UrgentComm

Meet smart city goals cost-effectively dlvr.it/SQmPkr

20th May 2022

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X