https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

A head scratcher

A head scratcher

  • Written by raidee
  • 1st October 2018

Now, appearances can be deceiving, but this is a head-scratcher on couple of levels. 

First, Fitzgerald has been lauded by supporters as the poster child of open and transparent government, particularly as it relates to the practices of FirstNet. Yet, at the moment when there was a chance that the public might get a glimpse into the inner workings of FirstNet—and better understand Fitzgerald’s allegations, which he has refused to discuss publicly since making his statement in April—via these e-mails, Fitzgerald opted to take the one action that could block the public from learning this information.

Second, by providing the e-mails to the federal government, Fitzgerald bolstered the position of FirstNet/NTIA/DOC, despite the fact that he alleged in April that FirstNet board members were not sharing information with him and some sources have claimed that Fitzgerald has been treated almost as an outcast on the board.

In a vacuum, this might be an admirable sign of professionalism; after all, Fitzgerald is a member of the FirstNet board, and he should do what’s in the best interest of FirstNet, regardless of any personal issues he may have with other board members or the fledgling organization’s practices.

But what makes Fitzgerald’s alleged actions so puzzling is that he ignored the directives of the Story County board of supervisors to not release the e-mails to the federal government before providing them to Romm. After all, Fitzgerald “day job” is to serve as the elected sheriff of Story County, a position that he has held for two decades—long enough to allow him to become president of the National Sheriffs’ Association when public safety was lobbying Congress for the D Block, which led to him being named to the FirstNet board.

While Fitzgerald may have some enemies on the FirstNet board, he has plenty of friends in Story County—you don’t get re-elected to a job several times if that’s not the case. Fitzgerald has done good work for Story County, and Story County has been good to Fitzgerald, providing him with a paycheck for 20 years and the flexibility necessary to lead a national trade association.

With this in mind, it’s rather surprising that Fitzgerald would release the e-mails early to the federal government against the decision made by the Story County board of supervisors. Fitzgerald and county board members are all elected and operate “at the same level,” according to the Story County filing, but the board of supervisors does determine the budget for the sheriff’s office. In other words, you would think that any choice by Fitzgerald to contradict a county board decision was not made lightly, especially since he supposedly sought outside legal advice.

Given these circumstances, lots of questions come to mind regarding the content of these e-mails. Federal attorneys have expressed “deep concern of the potentially significant harm that would result if Story County were to publicly release e-mails sent by and between Sheriff Paul Fitzgerald relating to his participation as a sworn federal officials in the work of … FirstNet,” according to a letter from Acting Associate Attorney General Elizabeth Taylor to Story County Attorney Stephen Holmes.

Exactly what this means is unknown to those of us on the outside, but it generates a ton of questions surrounding Fitzgerald and his allegations. Here are some examples:

  • Would releasing these e-mails somehow jeopardize the investigation into Fitzgerald’s ethical and procurement allegations?
  • Is the “potentially significant harm” cited by federal attorneys related to the FirstNet mission, such as violating nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) that FirstNet signed with manufacturers to know the upcoming product roadmaps of vendors, so FirstNet can make more-informed network planning decisions? Or, is the “potentially significant harm” that the e-mails might make FirstNet look bad?
  • Would the e-mails reveal the evidence Fitzgerald had when he made his allegations? If so, why would he take an action that would hide their release?
  • Did Fitzgerald know that providing the e-mails early to the U.S. Department of Commerce would prevent their release? If so, is there something in those e-mails that Fitzgerald wants to hide for personal reasons?
  • Politicoreporter Tony Romm—the person making the open-records request to Story County—has written multiple stories about alleged Motorola Solutions efforts to undermine FirstNet. Was the open-records request related to the Motorola Solutions stories? If so, would the e-mails reveal some of the conflicts of interests on the FirstNet board that Fitzgerald has alleged? Does Fitzgerald have a relationship with Motorola Solutions?
  • When Fitzgerald made his lengthy statement alleging improprieties during the April 23 FirstNet meeting, he clearly was reading from a piece of paper. No one has questioned whether Fitzgerald believes in the allegations, but many industry sources doubt that Fitzgerald actually wrote the allegations that he read, noting the legal-sounding language used in his statement. Would the e-mails reveal an author other than Fitzgerald?

Like many people who follow FirstNet, I wish I had the answer to these questions. Right now, all we have is a lot of hypotheses and speculation regarding the e-mails, and that’s not worth publishing at the moment. Hopefully, no one will jump to conclusions based on the considerable speculation that exists right now—because they very likely will be wrong.

Tags:

Related Content

  • Open-source tools for the IoT ecosystem
  • Satellite Made Simple: Easy-to-Deploy Connectivity On-the-Go
  • New Orleans-area 911 center inks multiyear APEX deal with Carbyne to replace call-handling system
  • A head scratcher
    Newscan: Feds recover millions from pipeline ransom hackers, hint at U.S. Internet tactic

Commentary


Land mobile radio (LMR) systems are just as vulnerable to cyberattacks as any other networks used in the public-safety sector. Here’s what to do about it.

  • 1
7th November 2023

September 3GPP Plenary meetings feature Release 18 progress, Release 19 beginnings

13th October 2023

Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.