https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

FirstNet officials say deployment speed, cost effectiveness key criteria for opt-out states, territories

FirstNet officials say deployment speed, cost effectiveness key criteria for opt-out states, territories

  • Written by raidee
  • 1st October 2018

SAN DIEGO—States and territories can choose to build the public-safety broadband radio access network (RAN) in their jurisdictions, but they will not be able to keep excess revenues and must meet difficult statutory criteria regarding decision-making and speed-of-deployment timelines, FirstNet officials said yesterday.

During committee meetings yesterday, FirstNet Acting Chief Counsel Jason Karp said the preliminary legal interpretations included in FirstNet’s second public notice—a proceeding that explores the “opt out” alternative that allows states to build out the RAN, instead of FirstNet—are designed to ensure that the much-anticipated public-safety broadband network is available as soon as possible.

“Those interpretations really are focused on creating certainty—for the states, for public safety and for FirstNet,” Karp said. “I think it’s important for everyone to recognize the need to deploy this network in the speediest fashion as is economically possible.

“I think the act is very clear that speed to deployment is one of the primary goals of this whole initiative. So, we have to be very careful in how we interpret some of these provisions, so as not to infuse unreasonable delay, because ultimately—outstanding the state and outstanding FirstNet—the stakeholder who is impacted is public safety and the ability to save lives and utilize this network.”

Because of the “opt-out” process established by Congress in law, any state or territory that pursues the opt-out alternative will delay the buildout of the RAN in its jurisdiction. Karp said. Industry observers acknowledged that the delay likely will be more than a year, based on the following sequential steps outlined by FirstNet yesterday:

  • A governor for a state or territory must wait until FirstNet presents its state plan before making a decision whether to pursue the opt-out alternative;
  • A governor has 90 days after the state plan is presented to decide whether to accept the plan or opt out, which means the state would try to build out its own RAN. This time period is set by statute and cannot be adjusted by FirstNet, Karp said;
  • An opt-out state has 180 days to conduct a request for proposal (RFP) to assemble the resources necessary to build out the RAN in its jurisdiction. Again, this period is set by statute and cannot be adjusted by FirstNet, Karp said;
  • Get FCC approval for the RAN plan. If the FCC approves the plan, FirstNet can choose to determine that it no longer has an obligation to plan for the RAN deployment in the state or territory, Karp said;
  • After getting FCC approval on the RAN plan, the state or territory must apply to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)—the government body that oversees FirstNet—to get approval to pursue spectrum-lease agreement, so it can access FirstNet’s Band 14 700 MHz airwaves that must be used for RAN operations; and
  • Negotiate a spectrum-lease agreement with FirstNet.

Some commenters in the proceeding expressed concern that the 180 days to conduct an RFP is not enough time for a state to conduct the procurement processes necessary a statewide RAN project. Karp acknowledged the challenge but said FirstNet does not have the power to alter the timeline set by Congress.

“We are fully 100% appreciative of those positions, going through an RFP process ourselves,” he said. “But we have little to no flexibility, in terms of what we can do in changing the statutory requirement. I think that’s really important to emphasize.”

While some aspects of the opt-out process established by Congress are clearly established, others are not. For instance, the law does not expressly state that a state or territory opting to build its own RAN must negotiate a spectrum-lease agreement with FirstNet; the law only notes that NTIA approval is needed. However, because FirstNet—not NTIA—holds the license to the spectrum, FirstNet officials believe the step is understood.

If an opt-out state gets FCC approval, NTIA must approve the state RAN plan based on cost effectiveness, comparable completion timelines, coverage, security and quality of service to the FirstNet network. However, the criteria is not outlined in detailed; for instance, whether a comparable completion timeline is judged from the moment the matter is before the NTIA or if it is based solely on the time it would take to complete the project after completing a spectrum-lease agreement.

Some states noted in the proceeding that the notion of what is “cost effective” is not specified in the law, and many have acknowledged that what be cost effective for a state/territory may not be cost effective for FirstNet. Karp said that FirstNet’s preliminary legal interpretation is that “cost effective” judgments should be based on what is best for the deployment and maintenance of the overall FirstNet system.

Tags:

Related Content

  • Robot-bus trial succeeds ... mostly
  • NENA does not oppose $15 billion NG911 proposal, but wants language ‘corrected,’ CEO says
  • Cars, Medicine, Electric Grids: Future hackers will hit much more than networks in an IT/OT integrated world
  • Securing an open-source OS for IoT

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

ChatGPT may be fastest-growing app of all time, UBS Says dlvr.it/Sj4NfL

7th February 2023
UrgentComm

Public-safety coalition renews efforts to secure federal NG911 funding dlvr.it/ShwGfn

4th February 2023
UrgentComm

Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny dlvr.it/Shvpw3

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless dlvr.it/Shth0P

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them ‘verified’ Cloud Partner status dlvr.it/Shqngn

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Shapeshifting robot can morph from a liquid to a solid dlvr.it/Shqk9K

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Automakers against stampede to BEV dominance dlvr.it/ShpX08

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

FCC nominee Gigi Sohn headed for third Senate hearing dlvr.it/ShpDcZ

1st February 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.