Head’s up, FirstNet–Here comes wearable technology
What is in this article?
Head’s up, FirstNet–Here comes wearable technology
But there is more to these technologies than just what can be achieved when first responders are seamless and passively reporting environmental conditions and location. There are underlying technical features of wearable tech that—if architected correctly—greatly enhance their functionality over traditional communications systems.
A key feature of a well-designed, wearable sensor and/or device is that it can be operated utilizing discrete, robust, context-specific signaling using very little bandwidth, which is common for biometric and environmental sensors. This is important, because bandwidth-intensive, time-sensitive, continuous-connection services like video are not very robust, in that the complete messaging is more likely to be interrupted .
In fact, many things can go wrong with video: it needs lots of bandwidth, the signals essentially have to arrive in order, and it can only tolerate a certain amount of delay. If anything goes wrong, the frame freezes, the picture becomes frazzled, or just goes blank.
In contrast, a wearable communications sensor could transmit hundreds of copies of the same signal/message, and only one of them has to be received for communications to be successful. In a network designed for the purpose, these type of messages can get through under very extreme conditions.
What might a signal/message be? Detection of a gunshot or a significant change in surrounding temperature, pressure, heart rate, location, etc. The implications of such information may prove to be fundamentally important to the future of public-safety communications on a shared-bandwidth service like FirstNet. An oft-cited example of this type of signaling is the robust communications once supported in the Nextel push-to-talk feature. The small size of these discrete packets of voice data made it one of the more reliable voice networks in New York during the response to the 9/11 attacks.
Because of their small size, signals from wearable technology can be transmitted via a number of different mediums and channels, including the control, bearer, and broadcast channels. Another unique characteristic of short, discrete signaling is the ability for them to penetrate much further into structures—or transmit further outside a structure, if the signal is initiated from inside a building—because of its short, robust nature.
Great, the question remains
Great, the question remains on how robust these devices will be in high noise of a fire or deep penetrations of building.
Good points and it is fair to
Good points and it is fair to say we don’t know. What I can say is that most challenging ‘noise’ in such an environment is that electromagnetic energy emitted by electrical machinery. Depending on the modulation scheme, some signals are more susceptible to EMF than others. When it comes to building penetration. My contention is that small discrete signals over diverse paths and channels are better able to complete a link than a wide bandwidth signal like video.
Regardless these are things that need to be studied and tested to make sure they best meet the needs of Firefighters.