Most expect eventual public-safety transition to MCPTT over LTE, but timing remains in doubt
What is in this article?
- Most expect eventual public-safety transition to MCPTT over LTE, but timing remains in doubt
- Most expect eventual public-safety transition to MCPTT over LTE, but timing remains in doubt
- Most expect eventual public-safety transition to MCPTT over LTE, but timing remains in doubt
- Most expect eventual public-safety transition to MCPTT over LTE, but timing remains in doubt
Most expect eventual public-safety transition to MCPTT over LTE, but timing remains in doubt
Harald Ludwig, chairman of The Critical Communications Association (TCCA) Technical Forum, said the deployment of FirstNet will be the primary driver of MCPTT adoption by public safety in the U.S.
“I believe public-safety users will move to FirstNet as soon as it’s as good—or better—than the current service that they have,” Ludwig said during an IWCE 2018 panel. “As soon as FirstNet offers them the same radio coverage, the same availability and the same security, they will move over to FirstNet.
“When will this happen? I think it’s mainly dependent on AT&T and how fast they can harden the network and how fast they can build additional site. So, it’s difficult for me to estimate the timeframe, but it will take some years, I am sure.”
Mike Barney, director of public-safety programs for Cubic and a former employee of Kodiak Networks and the state of Texas, agreed that public safety must first become comfortable with MCPTT, something that may not happen until the technology proves to work well during an emergency response in the wake of major disaster. If MCPTT proves to be effective, government economics may play a large role in determining the speed of adoption, he said.
“When budgets get tight, the technical guys, the radio managers and the IT managers don’t necessarily get to make the choices,” Barney said during an IWCE 2018 session. “The choice may be made for you that you’re not going to get your $50 million LMR upgrade.”
LMR upgrades may still be funded in the near term, particularly if a radio system already has reached its end of life and is no longer supported by the manufacturer, Barney said. However, for entities that upgraded their LMR systems to meet the FCC’s narrowbanding mandate in 2013, MCPTT could prove to be a viable alternative to an expensive LMR upgrade in 5-7 years, he said.
“Once these proof points are made or if an economic downturn happens, I predict that they will actually end of life their systems early and start moving forward with mission-critical LTE,” Barney said. “By 2025, I think that you’re going to have a very large number of agencies that have developed plans and start the transition.”
Seybold asked the MCPTT timing question to the speakers on the IWCE 2018 panel he moderated, but he indicated that the transition from LMR could take longer than most expect.
“Ten years from now, I’ll ask you the same question, and I know that somebody else will say, ‘Ten more years,’” Seybold said.
Once Motorola saw the end of
Once Motorola saw the end of P25 phase 2 due to MCPTT they bumped the ISSI price up 3 times….
I love these articles. Who
I love these articles. Who are these first responders they reference in these articles? It is very safe to say that a overwhelming majority public safety users are super skeptical of first net and most things cellular, and for very good reason. LMR continues to grow, system are being built and augmented and rightfully so. IWCE was a clear predictor of this. Please donny, stop being a paid cheerleader of this stuff. It is insulting to public safety professionals, and It is bad for public safety in general. Just yesterday AT&T network was down for almost 4 hours on the east coast… how’s that gonna work out during major emergencies or hurricanes. Leave the cell phones for the high school kid selfies.
I have to say ditto to
I have to say ditto to AnonymousRadioNY’s comments. “Skeptical… for very good reason”, indeed. I’m sure that 1W capability on unlicensed 900 MHz will make up for any shortcomings of the “network”. I’m also sure that when there are problems with coverage, or the network being “down for almost 4 hours on the east coast”, there will be a “special” number we can call to turn in a “trouble ticket” (my favorite term to arise from our new dumbed-down, IT approach to communications).
I am posting this comment
I am posting this comment anonymously because I’d like to add to the 30 years of direct experience in Public Safety & mission critical communications systems. I concur with the two previous comments. Due to it’s technical characteristics and economics it is highly questionable FirstNet and other LTE systems will replace LMR for mission critical voice. I simply would not want my life to depend on it. One size does not fit all when you’re under fire or on a fire.
I am skeptical of AT&T’s
I am skeptical of AT&T’s network being down for 4 hours. One, I question what was down. One cell site, an application, or just more blocks than expected. Another issue is Public Safety networks do not have down times published as with national carriers. If a local P-25 system is down, it is localized. Hope this helps put things in perspective.
It sounds like a device will
It sounds like a device will need a working LMR component built-in to be considered a viable option for MC use for now. Hmmm