New technology improves firefighter location
What is in this article?
A look ahead
Expected to be commercially available next year, the GLANSER system may not be limited to just locating firefighters and other first responders, Mapar said.
"In addition to that, the unit is set up to establish a wireless mesh network all on its own — as soon as the unit is turned on, it starts to communicate with the other units around it," he said. "So, when people go into a building, each person becomes a node — and, in our case, the more the merrier."
The existence of that mesh network creates multiple communications possibilities for the future, including the potential exchange of data and voice information with additional enhancements, Mapar said.
SIDEBAR: How GLANSER works
One potential concern associated with GLANSER is its price, which currently is estimated to be about $3,000 per system — a steep figure for budget-strapped fire departments struggling to avoid layoffs. Mapar said that he hopes to convince manufacturers to build systems with GLANSER technology that are leased on a monthly basis, to help lessen the upfront sticker shock associated with an outright purchase.
An even more promising possibility is the chance that the GLANSER technology could be implemented in commercial devices such as smartphones and tablets, which would greatly increase the economies of scale for the components, which traditionally reduces their costs dramatically.
"We started with trying to help the firefighters," Mapar said. "But the technology we're developing is, all of a sudden, catching the eye of the commercial market.
"Some of the big names in the commercial market are watching how we go about putting this out, because they want to use some of the technologies we have developed. They're even thinking about providing it as a service in the location-based services area that promises to be a $5 billion-$10 billion market in the next five years."
Mapar is comfortable with such "unintended consequences" becoming reality, especially if they benefit public safety by reducing GLANSER costs and the location-based technology is used to better locate mobile 911 callers.
Meanwhile, the fact that solutions such as GLANSER are being developed for firefighting — a sector often ignored in previous mission-critical communications evolutions — is a welcome sign, Werner said.
"I think these newer developments that are coming out are very exciting," he said. "I think we're starting to see that people are taking our challenges. They tried, and they failed, and they tried and they failed. Now, they're starting to get some solutions that really are starting to fit into what we need."
Are you kidding? “GPS only
Are you kidding? “GPS only provides longitude and latitude (X and Y) coordinates?” REALLY?
Two questions: How many variations of lat/long are there and why are none of them the STANDARD for ground responders? What is the U.S. civil standard grid reference system? Third question, why?
It’s just sad. Non-standards based approach by S&T will mean non-interoperability for many more years to come. Hose fittings all over again but in a technological sense.
To minimize operational friction during all phases of the emergency management lifecycle, but especially during the response phase, first responders and others (including military assets supporting civil authorities) require the ability to use and exchange standardized map coordinates. The lack of a similar, standardized procedure by state, local, and many Federal Agencies is a critical deficiency in U.S. consequence management.
Really it’s the first step in
Really it’s the first step in using this technology. Why criticize something you have never tried. It’s not a finished product and in the next 2-3 years it will likely change again. Relax.
Well, first off, GPS really
Well, first off, GPS really is only accurate for X and Y coordinates and provides questionable altitude information. Since satellites are liable to be anywhere along the horizon at any time, altitude performance is not effective and the final point, stated in the article, is that GPS does not work well in buildings – especially high-rises.
Agreed, though, that the data should still be transmitted in a standardized way, or even better, open-source so that while RF encryption still secures the data, the data can be read by authorized people such as developers who can build their technologies to interoperate based off of the same communications protocol.
If GPS only provides long.
If GPS only provides long. lat. (x,y) data and not altitude data, (z axis) why is it used in aviation? Do your due diligence Donny.