https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Urgent Matters


Opt-out scenarios from FirstNet appear increasingly tough for states, territories

  • Written by Donny Jackson
  • 9th June 2015
Many states and territories are exploring the opt-out alternative to being part of FirstNet, which would require them to build out the radio access network (RAN) in their jurisdictions. However, the risks associated with opt-out logistical issues, financial implications and potential political fallout may outweigh potential benefits to the governors making the decisions.

What is in this article?

  • Opt-out scenarios from FirstNet appear increasingly tough for states, territories
  • Opt-out scenarios from FirstNet appear increasingly tough for states, territories
  • Opt-out scenarios from FirstNet appear increasingly tough for states, territories

Opt-out scenarios from FirstNet appear increasingly tough for states, territories

While a legitimate argument can be made that revenues generated from the RAN in an opt-out state or territory should remain in the jurisdiction, there could be a significant price to pay for just making the argument. In addition to the financial costs associated with the lawyers needed to make the argument, there could be a significant political price to pay.

Assuming the state/territory is a “have” jurisdiction—and it probably should not pursue the opt-out alternative if it is not—putting its revenue in doubt could have a detrimental impact on the deployment of the nationwide FirstNet system, because the business model already is challenging enough.

If the FirstNet buildout is delayed for a protracted period because of the situation, the political pressure on an opt-out governor could be enormous, with scrutiny coming from Congress, FirstNet, other governors and public safety.

The fallout could make it hard for an opt-out governor to pursue higher political office. More immediately, it could put the state government in an awkward position with the public-safety agencies within its jurisdiction.

If a state or territory accepts FirstNet’s plan for its jurisdiction, the governor and other officials will be able to support their public-safety agencies’ requests—be it for greater coverage, reliability or capacity—in virtually all cases, advocating their first responders’ positions to FirstNet with little or no impact on the state budget. Whether the advocacy is effective is a separate question, but there would be little downside to supporting the public-safety position.

In contrast, it seems inevitable that an opt-out state or territory at some point may have to play the role of the “bad guy” with its public-safety agencies. After all, the opt-out state or territory may have to say “No” to certain ideas, because it—not FirstNet—would have to pay the bills associated with fulfilling public-safety requests.

In addition to the potential financial gains—if allowed—the opportunity to have greater control of the RAN is another prime reason cited by many for a state or territory to consider the opt-out alternative.

An opt-out state or territory would have greater influence on the network design and buildout of the RAN within its territory, but it also would be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the network. That means that an opt-out state or territory would have to pay for technology upgrades—be it related to the latest release of LTE or a security implementation—instead of having FirstNet pay for them, as would be the case if the FirstNet plan for the state is accepted.

“Look, if we do a nationwide software upgrade and you’re a state that decided to build your own radio access network, you’ve got to hook into our schedule for that upgrade—you can’t be one version off,” Swenson said, noting that state officials should ask themselves, “What control do you really want?”

In addition, there is no way to predict how market conditions might change a state’s outlook on the subject. A sudden downturn in a key industry within a state could dramatically impact its ability to pay for network upgrades. One particularly bad scenario would be a situation in which a state would have to lay off public-safety personnel to help fund a technology upgrade to the FirstNet system, which was established to help public safety.

There may be other factors that I am missing. For example, I’ve heard suggestions that opt-out states and territories could benefit from “management” or “administrative” fees that would not be classified as user-fee or secondary-leasing revenue.

I know a lot of good people who have been asked to evaluate whether the opt-out alternative makes sense for their state or territory. Based on the rules in place and FirstNet’s preliminary legal interpretations, I think those advising a governor on this subject will be hard-pressed to recommend that a state assume the considerable responsibilities associated with a statewide RAN buildout and maintenance in return for little or no additional control or financial benefit.

Given the logistical issues, financial implications and potential political fallout, the risks associated with an opt-out decision appear to be much greater than the potential rewards.

Opt-out scenarios from FirstNet appear increasingly tough for states, territories
1 | 2 | 3 |
Tags: Public Safety Commentary Funding Long Term Evolution (LTE) NTIA/FirstNet Policy Public Safety Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet Urgent Matters Commentary

Related Content

Commentary


LTE and liability: Why the fire service must move forward with digital incident command

  • 2
6th May 2022

Partnership and collaboration must be the foundation for emergency communications

18th April 2022

FirstNet success means no hypothetical ‘shots’ need to be fired, Swenson says

22nd February 2022
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Newscan: ‘Predator’ spyware let government hackers break into Chrome and Android, Google says dlvr.it/SR2lBG

25th May 2022
UrgentComm

Malicious Python Repository Package drops Cobalt Strike on Windows, macOS & Linux systems dlvr.it/SR0Qb2

24th May 2022
UrgentComm

T-Mobile’s CEO explains the company’s new private 5G strategy dlvr.it/SQyzhc

24th May 2022
UrgentComm

Hytera, Motorola Solutions refile appeal, cross-appeal in civil case dlvr.it/SQxNX1

24th May 2022
UrgentComm

Amid shifting workplace expectations, local government employers must adapt dlvr.it/SQwVVs

23rd May 2022
UrgentComm

The private-wireless networking opportunity shouldn’t stay too private dlvr.it/SQw7MT

23rd May 2022
UrgentComm

Europe’s first driverless-car test completed dlvr.it/SQvqyY

23rd May 2022
UrgentComm

FCC approves order to modernize priority-service rules dlvr.it/SQmSN0

20th May 2022

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X