https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • WHY ATTEND
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Registration Opens April 2019-Join Our Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Critical Infrastructure


Responses to FirstNet public notice reveal little consensus on ‘public-safety entity’ definition

  • Written by Donny Jackson
  • 16th June 2015
​FirstNet’s public-notice proceeding offering a revised definition of a “public-safety entity” that could qualify for prioritized access on the proposed nationwide public-safety broadband notice did not generate consensus among those responding in the proceeding. Instead, commenters offered varied opinions, with many expressing concern that the latest preliminary interpretation could create practical issues.

What is in this article?

  • Responses to FirstNet public notice reveal little consensus on ‘public-safety entity’ definition
  • Responses to FirstNet public notice reveal little consensus on ‘public-safety entity’ definition
  • Responses to FirstNet public notice reveal little consensus on ‘public-safety entity’ definition

Responses to FirstNet public notice reveal little consensus on ‘public-safety entity’ definition

Commenters in FirstNet’s public-notice proceeding examining the definition of a “public-safety entity” that could qualify for prioritized access on the proposed nationwide public-safety broadband notice offered varied opinions, with many expressing concern that the latest preliminary interpretation could create practical issues.

For the second consecutive year, commenters unanimously supported the notion that traditional public-safety entities—fire, law enforcement and emergency medical service (EMS)—are public-safety entities that should be primary users of the FirstNet system and should be eligible for priority access on the network. What has been debated is whether the public-safety-entity qualification should be extended to critical-infrastructure entities, such as governments, medical facilities, utilities and transportation agencies.

Last year, FirstNet examined the definition of “public-safety entity” in its first public-notice proceeding, which stated that a public-safety entity is any entity that provides public-safety services at any time, even if most of its functions typically are not related to public safety. Most respondents agreed with FirstNet’s position, with the notable exceptions of wireless carriers and the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO), which said the interpretation represented an overreach that was not intended by Congress.

In this year’s third public notice, FirstNet offered an adjusted preliminary legal interpretation that the “public-safety entity” definition could be extended to a subgroup of critical-infrastructure entities, as opposed to the entire organization. The third public notice cites the case of a utility worker who clears a dangerous downed electrical line from an area—thereby allowing first responders to proceed with their duties—as an example of someone within a non-traditional public-safety group potentially qualifying as a public-safety entity.

In addition, the preliminary legal interpretation included in third public notice clarifies that “the primary ramification of falling within this definition is that a public-safety entity is served by FirstNet directly, rather than as a commercial customer of a secondary user of FirstNet’s spectrum” and that “public-safety entities would be served by the FirstNet core network,” as the state of California noted in its comments.

In its response, APCO acknowledged that FirstNet’s altered third-notice interpretation was not as bad as its first-notice interpretation, but the public-safety-communications organization clearly reiterated its opposition.

“APCO continues to strongly disagree with FirstNet’s interpretation of ‘public safety entity,’” the APCO filing states. “While the Third Notice is a step in the right direction, APCO holds to the legal analysis included in its response to FirstNet’s original proposal.

“Public-safety entities include first responders and the personnel, agencies, and authorities who share their mission, not those entities that occasionally provide support to first responders. An alternative, broader interpretation would violate the plain language of the law and ignore Congress’ clear intent to establish a network for first responders.”

APCO’s filing also asserts that the FirstNet third-notice interpretation would undermine the financial viability of the nationwide public-safety broadband network (NPSBN) by limiting the potential commercial benefits to potential partners that will be needed to build and maintain the system.

“Broadly defining ‘public safety entity’ would reduce the value of public-private partnerships, and wireless service providers may determine not to partner with FirstNet, if it means a further reduction to their commercial customer base,” the APCO filing states. “FirstNet must avoid any such outcome.”

This sentiment was echoed by wireless carriers, such as AT&T.

“The more users that are eligible for primary NPSBN access, the smaller the pool of secondary users, disrupting the Act’s carefully calibrated scheme,” AT&T’s filing states. “Entities—government and otherwise—that currently use commercial services may rely on the NPSBN. Then, the more the NPSBN comes to resemble a commercial network, the less the incentive for private sector partnerships—a central feature of the NPSBN envisioned by Congress—thereby limiting the viability of the network altogether.”

1 | 2 | 3 |
Responses to FirstNet public notice reveal little consensus on ‘public-safety entity’ definition
Tags: Public Safety Critical Infrastructure Funding Long Term Evolution (LTE) News NTIA/FirstNet Policy Public Safety Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet State & Local Government News

One comment

  1. Avatar TC 16th June 2015 @ 5:28 pm
    Reply

    The narrow mindedness of APCO
    The narrow mindedness of APCO International on this point is surprising. If this is the prevailing attitude of the leadership of the public safety communications industry in the USA, it’s no surprise that full interoperability is so elusive throughout the country – and it will be no surprise if the NPSBN fails miserably due to being over priced and under-subscribed.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Hytera, Motorola Solutions DMR royalty dispute to be decided by federal judge
  • Using data to improve emergency response resources in healthcare arena
  • 3 security flaws in devices and IoT that need fixing

Commentary


Ransomware? Let’s call it what it really is: extortionware

21st February 2021

Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces

18th February 2021

Hi-tech sewer can help safeguard public health, environment and economies

18th February 2021
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

How SolarWinds busted up our assumptions about code signing dlvr.it/Rv25kB

5th March 2021
UrgentComm

Senate American Rescue plan calls for more than $60 million in direct aid for counties dlvr.it/Rv1wGF

5th March 2021
UrgentComm

NTIA seeks potential new FirstNet Authority board members dlvr.it/Rv0YfL

5th March 2021
UrgentComm

Smart-building projects target energy efficiency as launchpad to health and safety dlvr.it/RtyhRY

4th March 2021
UrgentComm

ESN official hints at potentially costly new timeline for UK public-safety broadband project dlvr.it/Rttvzj

3rd March 2021
UrgentComm

Ericsson, Huawei, AT&T attending Mobile World Congress in June, others not so sure dlvr.it/RtrtT2

3rd March 2021
UrgentComm

Newscan: Klobuchar calls on Congress to get serious on tech reform dlvr.it/RtqByn

2nd March 2021
UrgentComm

The era of converged network infrastructure has officially begun dlvr.it/Rtmq62

2nd March 2021

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X