Public-safety LTE market ‘nascent’ and ‘additive’ to Motorola Solutions, CEO Brown says
What is in this article?
Public-safety LTE market ‘nascent’ and ‘additive’ to Motorola Solutions, CEO Brown says
Motorola Solutions views public-safety LTE as an “additive” market opportunity to the company’s core LMR and network services businesses that are expected to remain as key revenue generators for many years, CEO Greg Brown said today during a presentation at the Sanford C. Bernstein Annual Strategic Decisions Conference.
Delivered just two days after responses to the FirstNet request for proposals (RFP) were due, Brown did not address Motorola Solutions’ potential role in a FirstNet bid. Brown described FirstNet as the largest public-safety LTE market opportunity but said that the effort to build a nationwide public-safety broadband network in the U.S. is taking longer than expected.
While some industry observers have questioned whether public-safety LTE systems eventually could replace LMR networks as the mode for mission-critical voice, Brown downplayed the concern. Instead, he noted that public-safety personnel already are using “public” commercial LTE networks and devices as a data supplement to mission-critical voice over LMR networks, but these LTE offerings lack the resiliency, security and guaranteed connectivity that first responders need during times of crisis.
“That dual-device scenario, we believe, projects for a long, long time, hence the additive [reference],” Brown said during the session, which was webcast. Brown referenced public-safety LTE as “additive” to Motorola Solutions core businesses at least seven times during the presentation.
Brown also cited multiple projects—most notably in the United Kingdom, where Motorola Solutions owns the nationwide public-safety TETRA network and is contracted to provide services for the public-safety LTE network—in which customers have purchased Motorola Solutions that enable interoperability between LTE and LMR systems. These investments are an indication that officials expect LTE and LMR networks to operate simultaneously for an extended time, instead of LTE replacing LMR, he said.
Given the characteristics of carrier networks and the needs of first responders, Motorola Solutions believes it can build private LTE systems that offer the public-safety-grade characteristics that are “not economical” for a carrier network to provide, Brown said..
“The LTE opportunity for use is to go after the carrier LTE market in the U.S.,” he said. “Therefore, in the United States., we want to take public-safety LTE—private network LTE—and go after what is consumer-grade smartphone and carrier minutes of use today.”
In a public-safety network, there are no user fees, according to Brown. In contrast, public-safety entities today are paying for first responders’ subscription plans and devices, which opens an opportunity for Motorola Solutions, he said.
“If we can provision mission-critical public-safety applications, if we can do that with a multipurpose rugged device, if we can do that with no usage fee and no data plan, and if we can do that provisioned over dedicated allocated spectrum, that’s the market opportunity for us,” Brown said.
“Now, I think it’s going to take a long time to develop, but that’s the additive new opportunity that we’re going after.”
This is great news for
This is great news for Motorola. Taking charge and focusing on their core business will be a successful approach. LTE and LMR are not the same thing, but indeed are complimentary. I see hints that Mr Brown is refocusing on the LMR solutions in that he is right, the LMR solutions are not going away, if they ever will. LTE is another platform altogether, that doesn’t mean that future investments in LMR will decrease, thus the market share with it, but staying connected to the advancing LTE and LMR feature sets will enable Moto to stay in play for the longterm. Only wish they realized this a few years ago. Also, they need to stay away from trying to be in charge of physical deployments, it will only detract from their bottom line. The cost to pursue, cost of product overheads, combined with high multipliers in a market of EPCs that will drastically cut the market out from under them is not inline with what I would think Moto needs to concentrate on. Working in close partnership with some major EPCs should be the focus, after all the scope of an LTE buildout really has nothing to do with LMR deployments — two totally different things. But, take my word with a grain of salt because I’m….
Just some guy and a blog….