https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • WHY ATTEND
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Registration Opens April 2019-Join Our Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


Preventing microwave interference

Preventing microwave interference

Wind and other environment influences play a major role in signal distortion
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st May 2004

Over the past decade microwave links have proved to be a popular solution for the telecommunications industry. The relative ease and economy of their installation has fueled their deployment in an increasing number of point-to-point and point-to-multipoint applications — from communications backbones to branch links and distribution networks — in addition to applications in the broadcast industry and in private enterprises. With the rise of new cellular operators and new technologies, overall microwave network density is undeniably escalating.

However, the escalation of microwave communications has created new challenges. The greater the number of point-to-point links in a given area, the greater the potential they will interfere with one another. Because any distortion of the signal reduces the quality of service, controlling interference is now the mandate of any radio network operator and national regulatory authority. A good starting point for eliminating, or at least reducing, interference is the design and location of the signal source — the microwave antenna.

Figure 1 shows a typical radiation pattern of a microwave antenna. This example shows the main beam at 0 degrees, plus side lobes that are significant to about ±90 degrees from the main beam. The side lobes can cause interference with adjacent point-to-point links and consequently must be minimized through careful antenna design and installation.

Radomes are used for two primary applications in radio-link antenna design. The first is to cover the antenna-feed system to protect it from the elements. In addition, a radome significantly reduces the wind load of an antenna system by preventing the dish and shield from “catching” wind. However, both radome material and thickness need to be carefully considered to optimize the power transmitted through the radome, while at the same time ensuring the side lobes are not increased to detrimental effect.

Figure 2 shows a plot of the reflection characteristics at a plane-wall radome for different materials. Each of these materials are characterized by a relative dielectric constant of εr = 2; however each material has a different loss parameter, tan δ, where tan δ ranges from 0.0018 (low loss) to 18 (high loss). Figure 2 shows that for low-loss materials, there exists two distinct minimum values of the reflection coefficient, for which a radome wall will allow maximum transmission of incident power. These correspond to design values where the ratio of radome wall thickness (d) to microwave wavelength in the sheet (λ) is close to either zero or 0.5.

The first case of d/λ≈0 is practically realized as d<λ/10 and leads to flexible radome materials with typical thicknesses of 0.4 to 0.6 millimeters — essentially as thin as is practical. Flexible radomes are commonly used for larger antennas (greater than 4 feet), to avoid the bulk and weight of solid radomes.

The second design case of d/λ≈0.5 is more complex, and leads to the design of solid radomes, which are more economical to produce at the smaller sizes (less than 6 feet). The practical implication of d≈λ/2 is that the thickness of solid radomes is always dependent on the wavelength (and hence frequency) to be used in the application. Assuming a dielectric constant between 2.5 and 3, typical solid radome thicknesses for selected frequencies would be as follows: 6 mm (14 GHz), 4 mm (22 GHz), and 2.4 mm (38 GHz).

It is important to note that if a radome of incorrect thickness is used, the transmitted power will be reduced, and consequently the antenna gain also reduced. Greater radio power would then be required to achieve the desired radiation power, resulting in a corresponding increase of side lobe radiations. This illustrates the fact that correct radome design is critical not only for optimizing link budget, but also for interference control, since an increase in side lobe radiations would raise the potential for interference.

Figure 2 is valid for the “ideal” case, where wave fronts hit the wall perpendicularly. Now consider the situation for signals not having this ideal orientation. Given the longer effective wave path through the radome material as they hit the wall obliquely, the optimum thickness is now also dependent on the angle of incidence (θ), measured as the deviation from normal.

In practice, however, angles of incidence of up to 20 degrees have negligible effect on the optimum radome thickness. This is illustrated for flexible radome materials in Figure 3, which shows the relationship between angle of incidence (θ) and d/λo (where λo is the free space wavelength) for achieving 95% power transmission through materials with different dielectric constants. For values of θ up to 20 degrees, the optimum thickness is barely impacted — particularly for low-loss materials, which should be those considered for radome design purposes.

A similar relationship holds for solid radomes. A small degree of tilt in the main beam — about 5 degrees — actually improves the performance of the antenna, by directing spurious reflections within the antenna away from the microwave feed system.

The influence of typical thin-wall or flexible radomes can be seen in Figure 4, which compares the radiation patterns — with and without radomes — of microwave antennas operating at 6.4 GHz and 33.4 GHz. At 6.4 GHz it is evident the radome has negligible effect on the radiation pattern. However, at 33.4 GHz the gain of the antenna is decreased by 1 dB due to attenuation by the radome. Once again, to achieve the same link budget, the radio power has to be increased by 1 dB, causing a higher interference potential outside the main beam. The presence of the radome also leads to increased side lobe levels, clearly visible in Figure 4 at azimuth angles between 20 and 60 degrees.

This effect of the radome on the 33.4 GHz antenna is because flexible radome design becomes more sensitive, at higher frequencies, to the practical constraints on material thickness and stability. Whereas the design ratio of d/λ≈0.01 can be achieved for the 6.4 GHz antenna, the best possible case for the 33.4 GHz antenna is just d/λ≈0.05, which is not as close to the ideal zero.

No matter how carefully a microwave antenna radome is designed, the potential increase in side lobes remains. This must be taken into account during other aspects of design and installation to minimize interference.

The standard-performance microwave antenna consists of an open dish and a feed system. Usually lacking a radome (although a molded radome is an option), standard-performance antennas are economical solutions for specific applications. Aside from the lack of environmental protection of the feed system, the main drawback is the diffraction of microwave power at the rim of the dish, resulting in significant backward reflections at azimuth angles of ±100 degrees that can seriously interfere with adjacent point-to-point links.

To literally block these backward rim reflections, antenna designers place a shield around the circumference of the antenna, to which a planar radome is usually attached. These “high-performance” microwave antennas may be further enhanced by the application of an absorbing foam to the inside of the shield, resulting in “ultra-high-performance” microwave antennas. The foam absorbs spurious reflections within the antenna and dramatically improves performance by limiting the side lobes.

Radiation-pattern envelopes for standard-, high-, and ultra-high-performance antennas are compared in Figure 5. The improvement in side lobe-reflection control of the ultra-high-performance antenna over both other antennas is evident.

Interestingly, though, the high-performance antenna exhibits poorer performance than the standard-performance antenna between 20 and 60 degrees — the result of additional reflections off the shield. It nevertheless proves significantly better at preventing backward reflections. Selection of the appropriate microwave antenna clearly depends on the intended application and the expected interference potential in a given area.

It is important that, once installed, the performance of a microwave network should not deteriorate due to environmental impact. While a radome might protect the sensitive feed system from the elements, only a stable construction can protect the dish itself from wind. Mechanical stability of an installed antenna is critical for it to maintain its point-to-point link, as well as restricting its potential for interference with adjacent links, should its orientation change.

Different antenna manufacturers use different methods of rating antenna resistance to wind. Radio Frequency Systems defines the operational wind-speed rating of an installed antenna as that for which temporary deflection of the main beam is within one-third of the half-power beam width of the antenna. (Half-power beam width is defined as the angle, relative to the main beam axis, between the two directions at which the measured co-polar pattern is 3 dB below the value on the main beam axis.) Within this operational wind speed — of which typical values are 120 to 140 miles per hour — the point-to-point link will be satisfactorily maintained.

Other standards consider the operational wind speed as that for which the main beam is not deviated by more than 0.1 degree. Whatever the method used, it is important to take the deflection of the mounting structure into consideration during calculation of the beam deflection.

The positional mounting of antennas must also be considered by operators seeking to minimize interference. Typical multi-antenna tower installations, with their many side lobe radiations, are a breeding ground for interference. In other cases, the mounting structure may directly impact the performance of the microwave link through shielding and the generation of reflections from outside of the antenna itself; this is particularly true when antennas are mounted on the face of buildings and solid towers. Significant reflections could arise when an antenna is mounted too close to a solid structure to the side. Such structure-generated reflections are likely sources of interference, and often are not taken into consideration by operators during installation.

Managing interference is not a new issue, but it has certainly become more critical as the prevalence of radio networks has grown. Judicious antenna selection, design and installation is more essential than ever to minimize the interfering effect of spurious emissions, and to maximize performance of the microwave link network.

Daniel Wojtkowiak is global product manager, vice president-microwave antenna systems for Radio Frequency Systems. He holds a doctorate in engineering based on his studies of multi-frequency radar. He joined RFS kabelmetal in 1989, and in 1993 became head of the engineering group responsible for the development of radio-link antenna and passive waveguide components. In 1999 he became product manager-microwave antenna systems, responsible for Radio Frequency Systems’ European region, and in 2003 was appointed to his current position.

Tags: content Tower & Site

Related


  • Florida SLERS renewal could wait until May as SLERS-2 procurement begins
    Florida agencies that depend on the State Law Enforcement Radio System (SLERS) for mission-critical voice communications will be able to maintain access to the system, but the longstanding maintenance agreement is expected to end when the current contract with L3Harris expires at the end of June, state officials said today. Patrick Gillespie, deputy secretary of […]
  • Spectrum coordinators initiate submittal of new T-Band applications
    Spectrum coordinators last week submitted applications to expand land-mobile-radio (LMR) systems operating on T-Band spectrum (470-512 MHz) into a queue, with applications expected to be submitted formally to the FCC beginning next month and continuing through June, according to people familiar with the process. Both public-safety and enterprise incumbent licensees operating T-Band radio systems were […]
  • AT&T says FirstNet Band 14 buildout more than 90% done, adoption tops 2 million connections
    AT&T has completed more than 90% of the buildout of its contracted FirstNet coverage using 700 MHz Band 14 spectrum “well ahead of schedule,” and the nationwide public-safety broadband network (NPSBN) supports more than 2 million connection, the carrier giant announced today. AT&T added almost 100,000 square miles of coverage to its network during 2020, […]
  • In the 5G race to space, Lynk takes the lead against SpaceMobile
    Startup Lynk expects to begin offering commercial services as early as next year, fully one year earlier than its rival SpaceMobile. Of course, being the first to market is not necessarily the primary indicator of ultimate success. Further, one company’s version of commercial-level services may not be the same as another. Nonetheless, the fact that […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Bridging digital divide by fostering digital inclusion and economic recovery
  • ‘The Holy Grail’: Public safety applauds FirstNet vertical-location launch
  • Florida prepares for new statewide P25 bid while seeking extension with L3Harris
  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision

Commentary


Ransomware? Let’s call it what it really is: extortionware

21st February 2021

Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces

18th February 2021

Hi-tech sewer can help safeguard public health, environment and economies

18th February 2021
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Hytera, Motorola Solutions DMR royalty dispute to be decided by federal judge dlvr.it/Rthqp3

1st March 2021
UrgentComm

Using data to improve emergency response resources in healthcare arena dlvr.it/RtYfFJ

26th February 2021
UrgentComm

3 security flaws in devices and IoT that need fixing dlvr.it/RtYRxm

26th February 2021
UrgentComm

Newscan: America’s creaky payment infrastructure is showing cracks dlvr.it/RtTzBD

25th February 2021
UrgentComm

California PD: ‘Game-changing’ Live911 streaming of emergency calls accelerates responses dlvr.it/RtPgXS

24th February 2021
UrgentComm

Why Tuscon is building its own 4G network dlvr.it/RtPDG5

24th February 2021
UrgentComm

SolarWinds attackers lurked for ‘several months’ in FireEye’s network dlvr.it/RtP07s

24th February 2021
UrgentComm

Buffalo’s 48 hours to navigate a mission-critical transition to remote work dlvr.it/RtNwfl

24th February 2021

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X