https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


After 800 MHz triumph, challenges loom

After 800 MHz triumph, challenges loom

Wireless 911 and Project 25 top associations' to-do list. A Q&A with APCO President greg Ballentine
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st March 2005

The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials played an important role in the negotiations that led to the rebanding of 800 MHz spectrum, which will begin this year. Recently, MRT chatted with APCO President Greg Ballentine about the FCC’s order and the rebanding process, as well as other technology issues APCO is watching closely.

MRT: What are the concerns of public-safety communications right now?

Ballentine: I don’t know if there has been a time in history when there have been so many issues affecting public-safety communications. Of course, one is the 800 MHz rebanding issue, which we have been talking about for several years. We still have to work out some details, but it’s exciting that we’re getting close to making some real progress.

MRT: APCO took a leading role in the negotiations from the beginning. Why was that important?

Ballentine: A lot of public-safety agencies don’t have the resources to represent themselves in this process. APCO sees that as its role. We are a member-driven association, and we have tried every step of the way to ensure that our members’ concerns were addressed in this process. In fact, we tried to anticipate the concerns they should have, even if they didn’t realize that themselves.

MRT: Was APCO pleased with the choice of the Transition Administrator, which will oversee and guide the rebanding process?

Ballentine: We think it was a good choice. APCO was one of five entities that had a seat on the Transition Administrator selection process, and we were the only public-safety entity at the table. The process went smoothly. It could have turned into a very political process. In fact, there were some companies I won’t name that reached out to APCO board members in an attempt to influence the decision, but the APCO board made a conscious decision very early on that we would stay out of the process from a specific-company standpoint.

MRT: How will public-safety agencies approach rebanding? For example, will large agencies tend to handle the rebanding themselves while smaller agencies outsource?

Ballentine: Across the country I think you are going to see a number of different approaches and strategies to the rebanding effort. Clearly, some agencies will be able to absorb the responsibilities in-house because they have the personnel and resources to do that. But some of the smaller agencies — and even some of the larger ones who aren’t comfortable doing it in-house — will look to outsource. Both models can work. We see it as our job to help those agencies make the decision that’s best for them.

MRT: Is there any advantage to one model over the other?

Ballentine: I don’t think we can answer that question globally. I think there are advantages to outsourcing if you don’t have the necessary internal resources or expertise. But there are some advantages to doing it in-house if you do have those resources and expertise. It really is a local decision based on the agency’s best interests.

MRT: What is you assessment of the FCC’s handling of the 800 MHz proceeding?

Ballentine: The commission has treated public-safety issues seriously and has — in numerous orders — come out with what we believe was the right decision. However, there is a concern that it takes a long time for the commission to act. While that might be appropriate in certain cases where there is a lot of information that has to be analyzed and researched, we sometimes get frustrated because it doesn’t seem it should take as long as it does. So we think there is room for improvement.

MRT: What else is on APCO’s radar screen beyond 800 MHz rebanding?

Ballentine: Technology is evolving so quickly — we have come light years in just the past four to five years in terms of the new technologies that have been introduced. That has caused APCO and public safety to be engaged in all of these new technologies as they come on the market to ensure that they are not adversely affecting us. Also, if I were asked whether the magic bullet has emerged in terms of new technologies to solve the interoperability problem, at this point, I would say no. A lot of people are putting their faith in some of these gateway devices, but we believe that interoperability is a lot more than technology.

MRT: What else is involved?

Ballentine: A major component is interagency cooperation. Sometimes that gets lost because you think interoperability is strictly a spectrum issue or a technology issue, and it isn’t. It requires planning and partnership. It’s also an exercise and training issue. This will continue to be hypercritical until the technology evolves.

MRT: Are there other areas of concern?

Ballentine: We’re involved with the FCC’s NRIC process at the moment, and one of the focus groups is analyzing whether wireless 911 accuracy will be tested at the national level, the state level, at the PSAP level or not at all. We have asked the FCC to make a quick decision on this because we don’t believe that the NRIC process will reach consensus. There are so many people at the table with different agendas — clearly the wireless service providers have a different mission than public-safety agencies. Both sides need to be able to have their positions heard, but to expect that we will be able to sit at the table and resolve this issue without FCC leadership and guidance is naive.

MRT: What is your assessment of APCO’s Project 25 initiative?

Ballentine: At a high level, initially and throughout the project, we expected that it would move quicker than it has. But when you drill down to why it hasn’t moved quicker, it’s because of the process, which is a valid process. Once we arrive at a standard, I think we’re going to be assured that the process resulted in an industry-specific and technology- and vendor-neutral standard that will benefit public safety. It has taken longer than we anticipated and all of us — including those leading the process — are disappointed by that, but we can’t compromise the quality of the standard for speed. Also, Project 25 is quite different today than when it started because we’re trying to be responsive to evolving technologies while still adhering to our principles. It’s been a moving goalpost.

Greg Ballentine is director of public-safety and emergency services for the Mid-America Regional Council in Kansas City, Mo. A 20-year public-safety communications veteran, Ballentine holds a seat on the U.S. Department of Transportation Public Safety Advisory Group and was recently appointed by Missouri Governor Bob Holden to the Governor’s Advisory Board for 911 Oversight.

Tags: content Wireless Networks

Most Recent


  • Vodafone UK starts 'risky' shift to 5G standalone
    Vodafone’s Andrea Dona has unflattering words for some of the IT products that could sit inside his high-performance 5G network. “There are OSS limitations,” said the chief network officer of the UK service provider, referring to operational support systems from unnamed vendors. “If there is full automation on the 5G element, and the OSS is […]
  • The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless
    Verizon had high hopes for private wireless networking. The company had predicted that by now it would be well on its way to making billions of dollars from the sale of custom 4G and 5G networks dedicated exclusively to its enterprise customers. Indeed, during 2021 Verizon execs pegged the total addressable market for private wireless at around […]
  • NATE: Todd Schlekeway highlights organization's safety, legislative initiatives
    Todd Schlekeway, executive director of NATE: The Communications Infrastructure Contractors Association, discusses many of NATE’s planned activities for 2023, including a legislative visit to Capitol Hill in May, safety/training initiatives, and a broader release of the Vertical Freedom documentary that focuses on the lives of tower climbers in the communication arena.  
  • AT&T boasts of core 'white box' success in 5G, fiber push
    AT&T said it has now migrated more than 52% of all of its production traffic onto next-generation “white box” core routers running on products from the likes of Broadcom and DriveNets. The company said its move to such “open” systems has helped its aggressive 5G and fiber expansions. “We announced the next-gen open disaggregated core routing […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • The battle over connected cars drags on
  • UK officials revamp ESN plans again, target Airwave-to-LTE transition for end of 2026
  • PSCR: Dereck Orr highlights features of June 21-24 virtual event
  • FirstNet buildout on pace for March 2023 completion, AT&T official says

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

AR-based next-gen maps aim to rebalance detail and simplicity dlvr.it/Sj4gdM

7th February 2023
UrgentComm

Vodafone UK starts ‘risky’ shift to 5G standalone dlvr.it/Sj4dPJ

7th February 2023
UrgentComm

ChatGPT may be fastest-growing app of all time, UBS Says dlvr.it/Sj4NfL

7th February 2023
UrgentComm

Public-safety coalition renews efforts to secure federal NG911 funding dlvr.it/ShwGfn

4th February 2023
UrgentComm

Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny dlvr.it/Shvpw3

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless dlvr.it/Shth0P

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them ‘verified’ Cloud Partner status dlvr.it/Shqngn

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Shapeshifting robot can morph from a liquid to a solid dlvr.it/Shqk9K

2nd February 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.