https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Call Center/Command


Is this finally P25’s year?

Is this finally P25’s year?

More vendors commit to standard, which continues to slowly evolve
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st May 2005

A decade ago, the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials formally established the Project 25 standard that governs public-safety interoperable digital radio communications in North America. While moving P25 from committee to deployed hardware has been slow in coming, European agencies have more effectively rallied around their own digital radio standard, TETRA.

P25’s advocates aren’t shy in saying it has taken a while for the standard to catch on, but that is expected to change rapidly over the next few years. While acknowledging that P25 has been “slow gathering momentum,” Don Pfohl, co-director of APCO’s Project 25 steering committee, called P25 an “outstanding success.”

“We now have four major [radio] manufacturers that have committed to shipping [P25-compatible] equipment by the end of the year,” he said. “There’s been a marked change in this industry. They recognized that Project 25 was the only standard out there that was getting more acceptance all the time. Some of the manufacturers that were against it in the beginning are now coming on board, realizing it is the only game in town now.”

Project 25 was started in 1989 and designed from the outset to be an open standards process to improve spectrum efficiency; allow effective, efficient and reliable intra-agency and inter-agency communications; ensure open competition among multiple vendors; and provide enhanced functionality via equipment and capabilities focused on public-safety needs.

It also was designed to provide an orderly growth path for agencies to migrate from legacy analog equipment into digital systems. Vendors would build equipment to P25-compliant standards, allowing agencies to mix and match equipment rather than being locked into one vendor. Agencies also would benefit by being able to more accurately compare direct features and benefits of both individual radios and entire systems.

Phase I of the project was completed in 1995 and defined the common air interface standard, which specified an FDMA access method, QPSK-C modulation, 9.6 kb/s data rate and a DVSI vocoder using a 12.5 KHz channel.

“There were a couple of non-critical interfaces not included, including a console and inter-system interface, but the basic way radios talk to each other was completed,” Pfohl said.

But the finalization of the P25 standard marked only the beginning of a process that will continue for many years, according to experts. One of those experts, Bill Belt, director of the Telecommunications Industry Association’s wireless division, said it takes a while for equipment to be built to a standard once it has been created.

“It takes a lot of money to buy new equipment. There’s always a funding problem for communities to upgrade existing analog equipment for interoperable digital systems,” he said. “Radio equipment is very reliable and lasts a long time. Ten years is not an unusually long time for a standard.” TIA has acted as a facilitator in the P25 process, working with APCO and manufacturers to make sure both sides are satisfied and can live with the established standards. “Standards are always designed to be evolving. I hope [P25] is around for many more years as user requirements are evolving,” Belt said.

As P25 was being developed in North America, the European community produced TETRA (terrestrial trunked radio), their own open digital radio standard for public-safety use. “TETRA has been adopted by most countries outside of North America,” said Graham Matthews, managing director of TETRA products vendor Sepura.

“TETRA is in 60 countries worldwide and will have about a million users by the end of the year. Four million users are expected in the next three years. It took a hell of a long time to get the TETRA standard together, but once we got it rolling, it took off.”

All European countries and China have adopted the standard, and contracts for TETRA systems can be found across Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, the Middle East, South Africa and South America. Because of intellectual property issues surrounding TETRA’s GSM technology, the equipment currently is not available within North America.

According to Sepura, about 89 TETRA equipment vendors currently exist, which has created a competitive environment that has benefited end users. “TETRA radios cost well below a thousand dollars each while a [P25 radio] costs anywhere from $5000 to $6000 for a similar product,” said Malcom Ouelch, Sepura’s development director.

Another factor that has driven down costs of TETRA-compatible products is the wider market for those products. “TETRA is also suitable for commercial systems. It has a wider appeal to utilities [and] customized solutions,” Matthews said. “TETRA provides trunking with TDMA to make it a high-density solution. You can get a lot of traffic out of it.”

TIA’s Belt agreed. “P25 is definitely focused on first responders. There are no commercial applications that I am aware of,” he said.

However, Belt added that P25 systems have proliferated in significant numbers outside of North America. “In mid-2004, there were 660 P25 operational networks in 54 countries worldwide,” he said. “There are large deployments in South America, the Middle East and Eastern Europe, with systems deployed in Russia, India, Australia, and China.”

Pfohl said there are other reasons why P25 radios are more expensive than their TETRA cousins.

“[TETRA] doesn’t meet the needs of North America and doesn’t meet the needs of a great many public-safety systems,” he said. “A Project 25 system has the same coverage as the analog system it replaces.”

Where TETRA is effective in densely populated areas, Project 25 conventional and trunked systems are more effective in areas where coverage is an issue, Pfohl said. “When you need coverage, Project 25 is much better,” he said. “It’s applicable to all the public-safety bands in North America. You can replace an existing [public-safety] analog system with a P25 system and be compatible with legacy equipment.”

There are many places in North America that lack Europe’s density, Pfohl said, pointing to his home state of Oregon where he is a communications manager for the state police. “Look at a place like Oregon, [which has] a statewide system with 140 sites,” said Pfohl. “If we tried to put in a lower-power [TETRA] system, it would take over 200 sites and be much more expensive. I think it’s true at many parts of the world. Germany is about the same physical size as Montana. Montana has one million people. Germany has ninety million. … In ninety percent of the United States, maybe more of Canada, you don’t have the population density to justify anything but Project 25.”

One area where the P25 steering committee would like to see faster progress is the finalization of the Phase II standards, especially intersystem interoperability standards. “In order for systems to grow competitively, we need the intersystem interface,” Pfohl said. “I wouldn’t say we are comfortable with the way things are today.”

Also tied into Phase II development are standards for both console interface and fixed station interface. “Once established, you’d be able to competitively bid consoles and base stations,” Pfohl said. “We’re not pleased [with the delay]. We have held off making a decision, but if industry can’t come to consensus, we may have to force a consensus.”

Belt says that a delay on Phase II shouldn’t prevent agencies from acquiring P25 systems. “The standards are designed to be backwards-compatible. There’s no reason that an agency couldn’t buy a system and expect it to be interoperable with another P25 system. Security, spectrum efficiency and interoperability are all there today. Anyone who buys a P25 system today gets that stuff.”

Tags: Call Center/Command content Project 25

Most Recent


  • Public-safety coalition renews efforts to secure federal NG911 funding
    A coalition of public-safety associations today reiterated its support for federal legislation that would provide the funding needed to pay for 911 centers to migrate from legacy technologies to an IP-based next-generation 911 (NG911) platform that is designed to support multimedia communications, as well as traditional voice calls. Representatives of the Public Safety Next Generation […]
  • Is this finally P25’s year?
    Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny
    Web Roundup Items from other news organizations Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny Blinken postpones trip to Beijing after Chinese spy balloon spotted over U.S., officials say To protect satellites, secure your networks, chief of space ops says Ransomware offlines Arizona’s largest school district Mending the fabric: FCC says to file broadband-location challenges […]
  • The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless
    Verizon had high hopes for private wireless networking. The company had predicted that by now it would be well on its way to making billions of dollars from the sale of custom 4G and 5G networks dedicated exclusively to its enterprise customers. Indeed, during 2021 Verizon execs pegged the total addressable market for private wireless at around […]
  • Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them 'verified' Cloud Partner status
    Late last year, a group of threat actors managed to obtain “verified publisher” status through the Microsoft Cloud Partner Program (MCPP). This allowed them to surpass levels of brand impersonation ordinarily seen in phishing campaigns, as they distributed malicious applications bolstered by a verified blue badge only ever given to trusted vendors and service providers in […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Is this finally P25’s year?
    Newscan: Feds recover millions from pipeline ransom hackers, hint at U.S. Internet tactic
  • Cyber is the new Cold War, and AI is the arms race
  • Private wireless networks in the US start going public
  • Microsoft patches 6 zero-day vulnerabilities under active attack

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Public-safety coalition renews efforts to secure federal NG911 funding dlvr.it/ShwGfn

4th February 2023
UrgentComm

Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny dlvr.it/Shvpw3

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless dlvr.it/Shth0P

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them ‘verified’ Cloud Partner status dlvr.it/Shqngn

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Shapeshifting robot can morph from a liquid to a solid dlvr.it/Shqk9K

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Automakers against stampede to BEV dominance dlvr.it/ShpX08

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

FCC nominee Gigi Sohn headed for third Senate hearing dlvr.it/ShpDcZ

1st February 2023
UrgentComm

Sign up to learn how to successfully manage your Motorola ASTRO® 25 System: spr.ly/60143j8fp https://t.co/XcxiUwzN27

1st February 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.