https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Wireless Networks


Seeing is believing

Seeing is believing

More transportation departments are turning to video-based detection systems to keep traffic flowing and prevent accidents.
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st February 2011

On streets and roadways around the world, video cameras give traffic managers a real-time view of vehicular activity. When traffic slows down, the images help personnel assess the cause and decide how to respond. And when those images are distributed to the public over the Internet, they also may help travelers decide which routes to take.

In a growing number of locations, video cameras also are assisting traffic managers when there’s no pair of eyes to look at their images. Using machine-vision technology, video traffic-detection systems count vehicles, gauge their speed, determine when traffic has stopped and sense when vehicles are lined up at red lights.

Transportation departments use data extracted from such video feeds to control traffic signals, monitor traffic on highways, detect incidents and collect traffic statistics for planning purposes, among other applications.

A video traffic-detection system consists of a camera connected to a processor, which analyzes the incoming image stream. “It’s looking for edges, it’s looking for changes in the background, it’s looking for contrast, in order to reliably detect vehicles,” said Doug Carter, a representative with Peek Traffic Corp., headquartered in Palmetto, Fla. Peek offers two video detection systems, the Uni Trak 2 and the newer VideoTrak IQ.

Meanwhile, the Autoscope system, developed by Image Sensing Systems of Saint Paul, Minn., and marketed by Econolite of Anaheim, Calif., uses a two-step detection process, said Dave Candey, technical support manager at Econolite. First, when it detects a change in the video image, it runs algorithms to test whether the new object is a shadow, blowing trash or other non-relevant artifact. If the object seems to be a vehicle, the software applies a second set of tests that are specific to the application in question.

“For a freeway entrance ramp, when we’re looking for wrong-way vehicles, we’re looking for direction of travel against the flow — that kind of thing,” Candey said. Autoscope comes with a toolbox of tests that the user deploys to set up the unit for the correct application.

Along with sensing whether vehicles are present, a video detection system can, to some extent, determine what kinds of vehicles they are. “Statistics such as classification by vehicle length can also be used to determine medium-to-heavy truck movement, and that information can be used for roadway surface maintenance planning,” said Robert Ung, director of product management at Iteris, a vendor of video detection systems and other traffic-management solutions based in Santa Ana, Calif.

Video detection systems offer an alternative to the in-ground sensors that transportation departments have deployed for many years. Most of those older systems use inductive loops or magnetometers, devices that are embedded in the road surface and sense the presence of vehicles above them.

The video-based systems are non-intrusive. The cameras and their processing cards are installed at the roadside, so they don’t require making cuts in the road bed.

The initial cost to install a video detection system is equal to or slightly greater than the cost to implement a set of in-ground loops or magnetometers, Ung said. “However, in assessing overall life-cycle cost over 10 to 20 years, video detection is significantly less.”

The long-term cost advantage arises primarily because video-based systems don’t take much of a beating. “Loop detectors, because they’re an in-ground solution, are subject to weather and the vehicle traffic itself,” Carter said. Heavy trucks rumbling over loops pose a particular hazard. “Those loops deteriorate over time.”

Contractors performing road repairs or cutting asphalt for utility companies also may destroy in-ground devices, producing extra costs for the transportation departments that have to replace them.

Also, any time a transportation department redesigns a roadway — perhaps adding a lane or creating a left-turn lane — the existing loop configuration becomes obsolete, and the department needs to replace it.

But reconfiguring a video detection system involves simply redrawing some lines on a computer display. “It’s easily adaptable if lanes change or traffic patterns change,” said Brad Anderson, traffic control supervisor with the city of Fayetteville, Ark.’s transportation division.

Fayetteville uses video detection systems from Peek Traffic to control signal lights at approximately 60 intersections. The city installed its first set of cameras and controllers about a decade ago at its busiest intersection, a four-way that is ten lanes wide on one leg and six lanes wide on the other.

“It’s not a great place to cut inductive loops into, because of the lane closures,” Anderson said. To keep from disrupting traffic, the city decided to try a non-intrusive system. Ever since then, Fayetteville has been using video systems to replace loop detectors that wear out.

A final advantage of video-based systems is the video itself. “Even though video vehicle-detection cameras are typically not pan, tilt, zoom-type cameras, there are four cameras at each intersection, thus virtually providing 360 degrees of ‘free’ surveillance to the traffic management center,” Ung said.

In New Haven, Conn., video from the Autoscope system provides an extra advantage at intersections where those systems control the traffic signals. Sometimes, motorists will call the traffic management center to complain that they’ve been sitting at a red light for an unreasonably long time, said Bijan Notghi, a traffic engineer with the city. Video images transmitted to the traffic management center help Notghi determine whether the motorist is exaggerating, or there really is a problem.

“You can view it and say, ‘This poor person really is stuck,’” he said. Then he can send someone into the field to troubleshoot.
New Haven has been using Autoscope detectors for about five years, Notghi said. The city has installed about 200 cameras, mainly at intersections, but in some cases also at approaches to intersections.

Traffic-signal control is the most common application for video-based traffic-detection systems. In one recent innovation, some departments use the systems not only to control the duration of red lights based on current traffic volumes, but to extend red lights for safety purposes.

“We have used Autoscope for detecting pedestrians still in the crosswalk,” Candey said. When necessary, the system cues the signal controller to maintain the red light until the pedestrian gets safely to the other side. “It’s not the most common application,” he said. “But there’s definitely a move afoot among many agencies, and there are industry committees looking at how to better serve pedestrians in traffic.”

Traficon, a Belgian company with U.S. headquarters in Las Vegas, recently introduced a new product with the same goal in mind. Its SafeWalk system is designed to detect pedestrians and cyclists, both at intersections and in mid-block, and provide this information to the signal controller to take into account as it triggers the traffic signals.

On highways and bridges and in tunnels, the arguments for using video-based detection systems are somewhat different than the arguments that apply at intersections. Along a highway, there’s less infrastructure available for mounting cameras, and that constrains the way cameras can be pointed at free-flowing traffic. As a result, the data obtained from cameras aimed at highway traffic isn’t as precise as data that in-ground sensors would provide, Ung said. “But it is sufficient information to project congestion, incidents and things like that.”

And since roadside cameras can do double duty — giving traffic managers a real-time look at road conditions once the automated system detects a problem — video-based detection provides an extra benefit on the highway.

One place where cameras play that dual role is in southeastern Florida, where the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) uses machine-vision technology to assist the human operators who monitor video streams from cameras on Interstates 95, 595 and 75.

Since 2009, FDOT’s District 4 has been deploying cameras on the roadways in conjunction with the VisioPAD automatic incident detection (AID) system, manufactured by the French company Citilog. FDOT uses a fiber-optic network to transmit video from the cameras — which totaled nearly 300 in January 2011 — to its traffic management center (TMC). There, two staff members are assigned at all times to watch the incoming images for accidents, stopped cars and other anomalies.

Since the operators obviously can’t monitor images from all 300 cameras at once, the VisioPAD system provides supplementary monitoring. Installed in the TMC, the system’s processors analyze the incoming videos for atypical activity. When the system finds something unusual, it notifies the human operators.

“It will turn an alarm on the screen and say this camera has detected an anomaly of some sort,” said Daniel Smith, intelligent transportation systems operations manager at FDOT District 4 in Fort Lauderdale. “And you can just click on the camera and look.”

FDOT uses a different kind of non-intrusive detection system — based on microwave technology — to monitor traffic volume, as well as speed and lane occupancy on the interstates, Smith said. But the AID system provides a useful supplement to TMC personnel who are looking for trouble on the highways.

“About 15% of the incidents we detect are from that system,” he said.

Related Stories

  • Serve and protect
  • The impending explosion
  • Are we there yet?
Tags: Wireless Networks

Most Recent


  • Verizon officials highlight role of 5G tech for responders during IWCE keynote
    LAS VEGAS—As the public-safety sector continues to expand its use of data-intensive applications, developments in 5G can provide the low-latency, high-bandwidth connectivity to meet these needs, Verizon officials said yesterday during a keynote address at IWCE 2023. Bryan Schromsky, managing partner for Verizon’s public-sector unit, noted that the carrier plans to complete its deployment of […]
  • Rescue 42 launches miniCRD deployable for FirstNet
    Rescue 42 yesterday announced the launch of its miniCRD (mCRD) for FirstNet, which provides much of the functionality of the company’s Compact Rapid Deployable at a much lower cost.and in an even more portable form factor—two ruggedized cases that are about the size of checked luggage. Rescue 42 CEO Tim O’Connell said the mCRD (pictured […]
  • IWCE 2023
    Safer Buildings Coalition conducts annual event at IWCE 2023
    A common theme ran through the Safer Buildings Coalition’s annual meeting Monday night during IWCE 2023 at the Las Vegas Convention Center—strength through collaboration. “The perception is that the challenge is ‘out there,’ and someday, maybe the challenge will come here,” said Billy Bob Brown Jr., executive assistant director for emergency communications within the Cybersecurity […]
  • Seeing is believing
    IWCE speakers debate state of public-safety interoperability
    LAS VEGAS—Achieving comprehensive interoperability for mission-critical communications used by U.S. public-safety agencies continues to be an elusive goal, according to speakers addressing the topic during a Monday session at the IWCE 2023 event in Las Vegas. Some view interoperability as the technical ability for one person to communicate with another, no matter what device or […]

One comment

  1. Avatar dally 5th March 2013 @ 5:51 pm
    Reply

    Very interesting, I hope this
    Very interesting, I hope this system will grow in international networks as well, it will help prevent some car accidents as well. Maybe I’m naive to think about it, but I was in a car accident and only luck saved my life. I don’t want this to happen to other people.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • The battle over connected cars drags on
  • UK officials revamp ESN plans again, target Airwave-to-LTE transition for end of 2026
  • PSCR: Dereck Orr highlights features of June 21-24 virtual event
  • FirstNet buildout on pace for March 2023 completion, AT&T official says

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Gallery: The last day of IWCE 2023 dlvr.it/SllQKJ

30th March 2023
UrgentComm

Video: Opening of the Expo Hall on day three of IWCE 2023 dlvr.it/SlkyNy

30th March 2023
UrgentComm

Verizon officials highlight role of 5G tech for responders during IWCE keynote dlvr.it/Slkh9n

30th March 2023
UrgentComm

Day three of IWCE 2023 features the opening of the Expo Hall dlvr.it/Slhgvr

30th March 2023
UrgentComm

Gallery: The Expo Hall opens on day three of IWCE 2023 dlvr.it/SlhfPT

29th March 2023
UrgentComm

Rescue 42 launches miniCRD deployable for FirstNet dlvr.it/SlgdtY

29th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: 📽️ More sights from Day 2 at #IWCE23. It's been a fantastic start so far... Thanks to you! Tomorrow is another awesome spea…

29th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: Ildefonso De La Cruz Morales, Principal Analyst-Critical Communications @OmdiaHQ takes the stage and kicks off tonight’s Keyn…

29th March 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.