https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

‘Bane of my existence’

‘Bane of my existence’

  • Written by raidee
  • 1st October 2018

Given these opt-out timing issues, it is not surprising that Jason Karp, FirstNet’s acting chief counsel, declared the process to be “the bane of my existence as a lawyer.”

When we get to FirstNet’s final request for proposal (RFP), perhaps potential partners can submit bids contingent on different opt-out scenarios for each state. However, even that may not ensure the clarity that state representatives want to provide their governors when the time comes to make the opt-out decision—for instance, a governor may like the pricing associated with all states and territories opting in, but the governor may not like the pricing if even one state or territory chooses the opt-out route.

Frankly, although states and territories should explore the opt-out alternative and may want to use the possibility as a leverage point in negotiations with FirstNet, I think opting out is realistic for only a few. To make it work, a jurisdiction needs a lot of population density and technical expertise (finding and affording personnel with LTE training in this market is tough) that many state and territories simply don’t have.

Perhaps more difficult for me to envision is the idea that a governor would want his or her state to assume the financial risk associated with deploying the RAN within the state. My understanding is that, if something goes wrong financially in an opt-out state, the state picks up the tab, not FirstNet.

If the potential opt-out reward is great enough—for instance, if states could keep revenues generated within their jurisdictions to themselves—it could be worth pursuing. But that clearly is not FirstNet’s intention at the moment, because it wants to spread the revenue throughout the country.

One other argument that is repeated often is that some states would want to opt out because they want “control” over their portion of the FirstNet system. That is understandable from a conceptual standpoint, but I’m not sure how much control a state actually would have under an opt-out scenario.

Yes, the state could oversee the RAN buildout and pursue a desired coverage strategy, but that’s a significant project-management undertaking. Meanwhile, FirstNet holds the spectrum license and will operate the core, which is the “brains” of the network that will control much of the functionality.

In addition, depending on the details of the opt-out arrangement, it is very possible that the opt-out state would be obligated to upgrade its RAN based on a migration strategy dictated by FirstNet, not the state. If that proves to be the case, it sounds like a bad middle-management job: lots of responsibility and little authority.

Once again, if the financial rewards are great enough, it may make sense—after all, people take middle-management jobs all the time, usually for monetary reasons. But, if FirstNet succeeds in getting similar money from a state or territory whether it opts out or not, then having a state or territory assume the extra operational burdens and financial risks associated with the opt-out alternative does not sound especially appealing.

Hopefully, all of this opt-out legalese will prove to be much ado about nothing, instead of a process that leads to lengthy delays in the deployment of an all-important communications network for first responders. In an ideal world, the state-consultation process will result in the development of a state plan that will be something that a governor will be happy to accept.

Meanwhile, I’m encouraged that these meaningful business-model discussions finally are happening. Even though the answers to the problems may not be easy to find, the fact that these conversations are occurring is a significant sign of progress.

 

Tags:

Related Content

  • Federal judge orders Hytera to make substantial DMR royalty payment in July
  • ‘Bane of my existence’
    Newscan: DIA warns China’s space tech seeks to block U.S. radars, jam munitions
  • Updated: FirstNet supports eMBMS one-to-many capability, set for FirstNet PTT on iOS devices this month
  • CommScope downgraded for heavy debt load, ongoing supply-chain concerns

Commentary


Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023

Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.