IWCE panel reveals steep hill to climb for states choosing opt-out route

Perhaps even more interesting is another question: Would a vendor that is vying for contracts provided through the normal FirstNet process be hesitant about bidding on a contract with an opt-out state or territory? My hunch is that vendors instinctively will want to pursue any business that’s available. However, given the potential for lengthy delays—or possible shutdown of the project—during the FCC and NTIA approval processes, vendors may not bid as aggressively as they would for a project that is assured of starting when the ink is dry on a signed contract.

Does any of this mean that opt-out really isn’t a choice for states or territories? Not really. If the FirstNet plan provides the coverage, service, timelines and user fees that appeal to a state, it’s hard for me to imagine a state choosing to opt out. However, if any of these factors do not meet the state’s wishes—for instance, if a state wants public-safety LTE within five years, and FirstNet officials indicated that it would be at least 10 years—the opt-out option will be considered.

Panelists during the IWCE session focused on the most crucial item for states and territories: conducting the preparation necessary to be in position to help each governor make an informed choice when the time comes. Regardless which decision a governor makes, this is advice that makes a lot of sense.