https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


Taking responsibility for harmful interference

Taking responsibility for harmful interference

My conversations with operators around the country reveal that incidents of harmful electrical interference are on the rise. Some operators report that
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st July 1997

My conversations with operators around the country reveal that incidents of harmful electrical interference are on the rise. Some operators report that they are spending two days a week tracking down sources of harmful interference and trying to clean up the spectrum. Although the causes vary somewhat, the question remains, what is the FCC doing about it? The answer is, sadly, bupkis.

Remember the old days, when the FCC at least gave the appearance of wanting to help? Old FCC field office records gave the impression that a fleet of vans would encircle the offender like a pack of sharks, DF dorsal fins breaking the sky, and pounce upon the interfering facility with demands for immediate inspection and correction.

This enforcement was sometimes viewed as intrusive by otherwise well-meaning operators whose systems had slipped their tuning, or whose systems were sending spurious signals that the operators hadn’t detected. The presence of the FCC served as a necessary impetus for operators to do something, and do it quickly.

The problem is so basic that it gets few headlines, and that’s the reason why it has been allowed to get worse. Today, the FCC is “Broadway,” with shows, critics, plots, characters and stars. Nobody wants to talk about gum under the seats while the actors are performing. Rather than keeping order so the industry can do its thing on stage, the ushers_the regulators_have become part of the act.

Digital masking rules This publication has the word “Technology” in the title and, judging by the rest of the editorial content, the other writers are much more qualified than some cheesy lawyer to speak on technical issues. But speaking on behalf of cheesy lawyers (Our meetings require the entire state of Kansas, where there’s plenty of standing room.), we sometimes notice things first.

During the past few years, analog operators have been complaining about adjacent-channel digital systems, that broadcast signals with square wave configurations that are often incompatible with adjacent analog operations. The square wave overlaps the analog sine wave, and the energy pulsed into the adjacent analog wave desensitizes the analog receiver, which is attempting to capture the entire analog wave.

When this phenomenon is discovered by analog operators and is pointed out to digital operators, some of them respond with “Our equipment is operating according to specs.” This translates roughly into, “It’s your problem”_an interesting approach to spectrum management. (An approach that sometimes is mirrored by the FCC.)

The truth is that it is the digital operator’s problem, particularly in view of the FCC rules that require operators to take reasonable precautions to prevent harmful interference. Although operating a digital system with type-accepted equipment might be a good start in meeting the rules, the method of operation is as important as the equipment used. Therefore, if an operator knows that his system is causing harmful interference because of a system design that includes selecting the location and power used for each transmit frequency within a multichannel digital system, the creator of the problem has the burden of finding a solution.

Most of these situations that were resolved (and many are still ongoing) were fixed by the digital operator implementing a different frequency use plan or adding filtering. In other words, “Good fences make good neighbors,” but where this problem continues unabated, it can be severely disrupting to operators and cause numerous headaches for customers of the analog systems. So what is the better answer?

In Washington, DC, a place where few answers are found, one group is gathering information for the purpose of proposing rules to be adopted by the FCC regarding the operation of digital systems adjacent to analog systems. The object is to update the “masking rules” for digital operations. Masking refers to the distribution of radio energy within a frequency channel. The less energy there is that extends to the channel edges, the less likely it is to interfere with adjacent channels. The current masking rules for some services are the same for both analog and digital operations. Therefore, when an operator makes the switch from analog to digital, he is allowed to use the same masking rules.

If more practical masking rules were adopted, digital and analog operators could live in better harmony, without the increasing spectrum chafe. Of course, this would require some enforcement of the new rules by the FCC_which might be hoping for too much. At least a new masking requirement might cause equipment to be built that would be more compatible within the actual operating environment.

In praise of filters Another source of the interference problem is the failure by technicians to install filters. This problem is seen quite often in the installation of additional channels on 900MHz paging tranmsitters. The carrier wants to use a single transmitter to meet its construction requirement for multiple paging frequencies. The technician is directed to install the additional channels, but neglects to install additional filters to upgrade the transmitter into “good neighbor” status for the use of the additional frequencies.

The failure to install the filters creates a sloppy signal that splashes over the band and onto adjacent channel systems. Bingo! Harmful interference is caused that is difficult for the operators of adjacent-channel systems to pinpoint_and even more difficult for them to explain to the offending carrier. Although most readers of this publication like to think of themselves as RF professionals, the truth is that you often might be harassed by your company’s executives and marketing managers to “Get it done today,” even if today you lack the filters necessary to do the job right. You know when the channels are being installed that they might cause a problem without proper filters. Yet, sometimes you do the job you are paid to do, rather than the one you know is correct.

To solve this problem takes professionalism and ethics. RF engineers and technicians must expand their vision to consider not only how their systems are working, but how the operation of their systems might affect others.

Tell me more If you want to help solve the increasing incidents of harmful electrical interference, your input is sorely needed. You know the “whys” and the “hows” better than anyone inside the FCC because you have to live with the problems every day. Please send your stories, solutions, technical observations, and suggestions to me, Robert Schwaninger at 1835 K Street, Suite 650, Washington DC 20006, or fax it to 202-659-0071. I’ll pass it on to the group working on the problem.

Schwaninger, MRT’s regulatory consultant, is a partner in the law firm of Brown and Schwaninger, Washington, DC. He is a member of the Radio Club of America.

Tags: content

Most Recent


  • Taking responsibility for harmful interference
    Newscan: Securing the Internet of Things is quite a challenge
    Also: EWA requests dismissal of 900 MHz applications; TIA names tech and policy priorities for 2014; IJIS Institute names Shumate Award winner; App makes bus waits more tolerable; a Blackberry comeback may be in the offing.
  • Taking responsibility for harmful interference
    Newscan: FCC certifies Carlson Wireless's white-space radio
    Also: Congress looks to revamp telecom law; Obama to place some restraints on surveillance; IEEE to study spectrum-occupancy sensing for white-spaces broadband; Major Swedish transport operator opts for Sepura TETRA radios; RFMD to partner on $70 million next-generation power grid project; NENA opens registratiuon for "911 Goes to Washington."
  • Taking responsibility for harmful interference
    Newscan: A look at the critical job of 911 dispatchers
    Also: NYC launches website for tracking 911 response times; Oregon implements 911 on pre-paid cell phones; LightSquared wants to keep spectrum assets; Harris receives multiple government orders; FCC extends rebanding financial reconciliation deadline; Zetron gear at core of communications system upgrade; Ritron debuts wireless access control system; EWA seeks policy review of VHF vehicular repeater system deployments.
  • Taking responsibility for harmful interference
    Newscan: Average peak data rates of 144 MB/s average realized in tests with CAT 4 LTE device
    Also: Verizon, T-Mobile to swap unused spectrum to improve coverage; Internet giants oppose surveillance--but only when the government does it; FCC Chairman says incentive auction will be delayed until middle of 2015; FCC chair announces staff appointments; Alcatel-Lucent names Tim Krause as chief marketing officer; New Jersey county deploys TriTech CAD system; Toronto airport deploys 26-position Zetron console system;

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision
  • Photo gallery: 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson
  • Taking responsibility for harmful interference
    Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
  • Taking responsibility for harmful interference
    RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Airbus U.S.: Rebecca Purcell, Bob Baumann discuss MCX, Agnet offerings dlvr.it/SlJNqW

22nd March 2023
UrgentComm

Microsoft Outlook vulnerability could be 2023’s ‘It’ bug dlvr.it/SlC3Hh

20th March 2023
UrgentComm

Getting to know the how–and why–of the telecom cloud dlvr.it/SlBbD1

20th March 2023
UrgentComm

Zipline delivery drone docks, charges by itself dlvr.it/SlBNWy

20th March 2023
UrgentComm

State and local leaders can alleviate the burden on public-safety personnel by tackling three workforce trends dlvr.it/SlBH89

20th March 2023
UrgentComm

6G is shaping up to disappoint, and the industry can blame itself dlvr.it/Sl918J

20th March 2023
UrgentComm

Change is coming to the network detection and response (NDR) market dlvr.it/Sl4cts

18th March 2023
UrgentComm

Telcos need to build businesses, as well as networks dlvr.it/Sl4cRR

18th March 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.