https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Call Center/Command


BPL deployments come under fire

BPL deployments come under fire

The road to alternative high-speed data transport services via broadband-over-power-line technologies once appeared wide open. But now that path
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st February 2004

The road to alternative high-speed data transport services via broadband-over-power-line [BPL] technologies once appeared wide open.

But now that path is being obscured by the blue and red flashing lights of emergency responders who — along with other mobile radio users — may cause the Federal Communications Commission to derail the nascent technology.

Emergency service organizations and amateur radio operators have raised serious questions concerning the near-ubiquitous transport system capable of delivering data over power lines, due to fears that the system might cause leakage that would interfere with crucial radio frequencies.

Consequently, the FCC has opened a Notice of Inquiry [NOI] to determine whether BPL is the tool that would bring high-speed data to the masses or a radiation-leaking threat that would negatively impact certain mobile radio communications.

The technology’s problem, according to those who oppose it, is that it unnaturally modifies power lines to transport high-speed data, and in doing so, radiates energy that interferes with communications in more than 80,000 public and amateur radio assignments.

“Until we’re absolutely, totally certain that it’s not going to interfere with our public-safety operations, we just can’t support it at all,” said David Buchanan, chairman of the spectrum committee for the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials [APCO] and a network services supervisor for San Bernardino County, Calif.

National Telecommunications & Information Administration [NTIA] officials are conducting a two-part study — the first phase of which is expected to be submitted to the FCC this winter — that will measure 10 million BPL signal samples to define the radiation emanating from the power lines and its potential for local interference.

The study will recommend to the FCC radiated emission limits, compliance measurement procedures and other authorization conditions. The report’s second phase will include statistics on long-distance interference from large-scale, mature deployments of BPL systems, taking into account both underground and indoor wiring, according to a spokesman for NTIA, which co-manages government spectrum use.

In a speech to the Power Line Communications Association [PLCA] in Washington, D.C., last December, Acting NTIA Assistant Secretary Michael Gallagher explained that his organization is not completely opposed to BPL.

“The central technical issue from NTIA’s viewpoint is the risk that BPL systems might interfere with federal government radio communications or other private users that are important from a national perspective,” Gallagher said, citing FCC Part 15 rules that deal with frequency radiation. BPL runs in spectrum from 1700 kHz to 80 MHz, where it could touch frequencies assigned to a plethora of federal government entities, including national emergency response, law enforcement, search and rescue, and aeronautical and maritime operations.

However, BPL’s most strident critics are amateur radio operators, who vow to stop the technology from being deployed.

“There is a significant problem here,” said David Sumner, CEO of the Amateur Radio Relay League [ARRL]. “If you put RF energy, which is what a broadband signal is, on an unbalanced, unshielded piece of wire … there’s no way to prevent it from radiating because you’re feeding it into what constitutes an antenna. It’s simply a matter of physics.”

While Sumner bristles at the suggestion that the FCC might favor a new broadband transport system over hobbyist radio users, he concedes that ARRL would have “a tougher fight on our hands” if its members constituted the only affected user group.

“The same frequency ranges that affect us affect short-range broadcasting [and] affect aeronautical, maritime, military, the FEMA system,” he said. “We’re all in this together.”

Buchanan agreed that the amateurs “support public safety … particularly in HF [high frequency] communications. If it [BPL] ruins that, that’s no good for public safety either.”

Still, he’d like to see more results before closing the door on BPL.

“We don’t have a problem with it — if we’re absolutely certain it’s not going to cause harmful interference,” Buchanan said.

That’s a considerably more neutral stance than the one taken by the Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], which filed damning comments to the FCC’s NOI. “The purported benefits of BPL in terms of expanded services in certain communications sectors do not appear to outweigh the benefits to the overall public of HF radio capability as presently used by government, broadcasting and public-safety users,” the filing said.

However, the agency last month softened its stance. FEMA indicated it had not concluded a “material interference problem” exists and expressed hope that BPL eventually could be provided without compromising emergency communications, in a letter to FCC Chairman Michael Powell from Michael Brown, undersecretary for emergency preparedness.

FEMA initially was working from old data, said Steve Greene, director of regulatory affairs for Amperion, a leading vendor in the BPL space that is rolling out several BPL-based systems with power companies this year. Greene said Amperion has “conducted very extensive field testing … as required by the FCC” and that those tests proved the technology to be compliant with emissions standards.

“There are emissions, but the real question is if it meets with the proper rules — and that answer is clearly yes — and [it] does not cause harmful interference,” he said. “We are compliant with the Part 15 rulings which are currently in the books.”

Compliance may not be enough. The amateurs maintain Part 15 covers only momentary radiation bursts, such as noise from garage door openers, not ongoing transmission leaks. Sumner compared it to the difference between a helicopter passing overhead or hovering.

“What we’re facing with BPL would be the equivalent of having a helicopter parked over your house 24 hours a day,” he said.

The very nature of the transport system — power lines — is another problem, because BPL requires unnatural modification of the symmetrical 60 Hz transmission, said William Blair, an advisor to the Electric Power Research Institute. But those problems probably aren’t enough to prevent BPL rollouts in the end, conceded Blair.

“There are technical problems with shielding, with the designing of the transmitters for efficiencies and so forth,” he said. “[But] if somebody does it and they could actually implement this stuff and it’s under Part 15, then I don’t think the critics have much to say. I doubt the FCC is going to run around and change the law.”

It doesn’t appear the FCC will change its attitude towards BPL anytime soon. Chairman Michael Powell still is bullish on the technology, judging from remarks he made in a speech to the National Press Club last month.

“With BPL, you theoretically reach every power outlet in America with a broadband connection,” he said. “Our goals of universal service will be substantially advanced if this service is deployed.”

While Commissioner Kathleen Abernathy seemed to pull back a bit when her office issued a “what-she-meant-to-say” statement last fall, more recent remarks indicate she too is enthusiastic about BPL. Her office “expressed regrets” in November that remarks the commissioner made in a September speech may have failed to make clear her concern about BPL interference issues.

“We regret that the commissioner’s remarks may have been interpreted as suggesting an absence of concern over harmful interference,” Abernathy’s senior legal adviser Matthew Brill said at the time, in a press release that eventually appeared on the ARRL’s Web site.

However, in a speech delivered to students at Catholic University’s Columbus School of Law last month, Abernathy hailed the potential of the technology to bring broadband to rural and underserved areas.

“If the engineers can find a technical solution that prevents harmful interference, BPL represents a tremendous advance for consumers, because it could bring broadband to any home that has electricity,” Abernathy said.

Despite Powell and Abernathy’s apparent zeal, Sumner, believes his organization is on the right track. “There’s no question in my mind we’re going to win,” he said.

If so, it won’t be without a fight, promised Amperion’s Greene, who brings to the table considerable lobbying power in the form of the United Power Line Council and other utilities’ associations eager to find new revenue streams for their embedded power line plant.

“It’s in the FCC’s court right now,” said Greene. “They’ve been very supportive of the industry so far. They’ve gone on record as saying this is an extremely important broadband initiative.”

on the web:

For more information on the technology and business developments that are shaping the land mobile radio and private wireless markets, check out our Web site: WWW.IWCE-MRT.COM.COM

Tags: Call Center/Command content Wireless Networks

Most Recent


  • Verizon
    Verizon, Axon demonstrate benefits of 5G network slicing to support public-safety video
    Verizon and Axon Enterprises this week announced a successful demonstration of 5G network slicing that allowed its network to sustain connectivity performance levels for mission-critical video through Axon Fleet 3 and Axon Respond services. Network slicing is one of the most-anticipated features of the 5G standard for the critical-communications industry, because it allows a network […]
  • Cyberattack closes emergency rooms in three states
    Ardent Health says it was the target of a cyberattack over Thanksgiving, in an incident that shut down the hospital operator’s emergency rooms in three states. The hospital operator, which oversees 30 hospitals in the U.S., said the attack was detected on the morning of Nov. 23 and was identified as a ransomware attack impacting […]
  • General Electric, DARPA hack claims raise national-security concerns
    General Electric and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) have reportedly been breached, according to claims on the Dark Web that the organizations’ highly sensitive stolen data is up for sale. A screen capture from the Dark Web ad shows a threat actor named IntelBroker selling access credentials, DARPA-related military information, SQL files, and more. GE confirmed to […]
  • More 2G and 3G shutdowns loom in the U.S.
    UScellular and Cellcom recently set dates to shutter their aging wireless networks. The smaller network operators are following in the footsteps of their bigger, nationwide rivals, which are making similar moves. On its website, UScellular said it would shutter its 3G CDMA network on January 14, 2024. “Major wireless carriers have already shut down their […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Open-source tools for the IoT ecosystem
  • New Orleans-area 911 center inks multiyear APEX deal with Carbyne to replace call-handling system
  • BPL deployments come under fire
    Newscan: Feds recover millions from pipeline ransom hackers, hint at U.S. Internet tactic
  • Cyber is the new Cold War, and AI is the arms race

Commentary


Land mobile radio (LMR) systems are just as vulnerable to cyberattacks as any other networks used in the public-safety sector. Here’s what to do about it.

  • 1
7th November 2023

September 3GPP Plenary meetings feature Release 18 progress, Release 19 beginnings

13th October 2023

Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.