https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


The isolator: An RF traffic director

The isolator: An RF traffic director

An RF isolator keeps reflected power from returning to the transmitter output and keeps other signals from getting into the transmitter output. It also
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st July 2004

An RF isolator keeps reflected power from returning to the transmitter output and keeps other signals from getting into the transmitter output. It also provides a good impedance match to the transmitter output. This article describes the basic RF isolator and how it is used.

Figure 1 shows a drawing of a typical RF isolator. It is a three-port device with an input port, an output port and a load port. For our purposes, there is little need to know the internal design of the RF isolator. Hence, the RF isolator will be treated as a black box in this discussion. As depicted by the solid arrow in Figure 1, the normal direction of RF flow is into the input port, through the isolator, and out of the output port. Any RF signal entering the output port is directed through the isolator to the load port where it is dissipated as heat in the dummy load. The dashed arrow in Figure 1 depicts the reverse RF flow.

Figure 2 shows the typical response of the RF isolator in the forward and reverse direction. The response in the forward direction is very broad, offering little attenuation to a broad range of input frequencies. However, in the reverse direction, the response is relatively narrow. Maximum attenuation in the reverse direction occurs at a single frequency or a very narrow band of frequencies.

Using the black-box approach, let’s examine the typical operation of a properly tuned isolator (Figure 3). An RF isolator is connected to (and physically located near) the output of the transmitter. The green arrow depicts the normal forward RF flow. The dashed red arrow depicts the reverse RF flow back into the isolator. This reverse flow could be reflected power from the antenna, extraneous signals picked up by the antenna, or both. The RF signal entering the output port of the isolator is dumped off into the dummy load at the load port. The dummy load then dissipates the returned power as heat.

Let’s analyze the operation of an RF isolator by applying specific numbers to the setup shown in Figure 3. In this example, the transmitter RF output power is 100 W, the insertion loss of the isolator (in the forward direction) is 0.3 dB, and the transmission line loss is 1.5 dB at the operating frequency. Let’s also establish that the SWR at the antenna is 3:1 while the isolation (reverse flow insertion loss) of the RF isolator is 30 dB. Because the isolator has an insertion loss of 0.3 dB in the forward direction, the output power is 93.3% of the input power to the isolator. Consequently, we are able to demonstrate in Equation 1 (on page 36) that the forward power at the output of the isolator is 93.3 W.

Table 1 shows the equivalent percentage of power for decibel losses from 0.1 to 1 dB. The forward power at the antenna can be calculated using Equation 1. Or the calculation can be done using the data from Table 1. Because the transmission line has a loss of 1.5 dB, we can use the multiplication factors of 1 dB and 0.5 dB in Table 1 to calculate the forward power at the antenna. In this case, the factor for 1 dB is 0.794 and for 0.5 dB is 0.891. Multiplying these two factors and then multiplying the result by the forward power at the isolator output yields forward power at the antenna of 66 W [0.794 × 0.891 × 93.3].

The next step is to calculate the reflected power from the antenna, which we do in Equation 2 (on page 36). Hence, the reflected power is 25% of the forward power, or 16.5 W [0.25 × 66 W]. The reflected power will incur the same 1.5 dB of line loss. Using Table 1 as before, we find the reflected power at the output port of the isolator to be 11.7 W [0.794 × 0.891 × 16.5 W]. If the internal loss between the output port and the load port is negligible, then the power applied to the dummy load will be approximately the same as the reflected power at the output port, or 11.7 W.

Because the isolation (reverse insertion loss) of the RF isolator is specified as 30 dB at the operating frequency, the reflected power appearing at the RF output of the transmitter will be 11.7 W minus 30 dB. Because a reduction of 10 dB represents a power multiplication factor of 0.1, then 30dB is a multiplication factor of 0.001. So the reflected power appearing at the transmitter output equals 11.7 mW [0.001 × 11.7 W = 0.0117 W]. Table 2 offers a handy chart for finding the equivalent power reduction for decibel losses. The net radiated power is the forward power at the antenna minus the reflected power at the antenna, or 49.5 W [66 W – 16.5 W].

It is important to note that even under perfect load conditions at the output port of the isolator there will be some reflected power at the input port of the isolator due to a slight mismatch at the port. In the case of the preceding example, suppose that the manufacturer’s specifications stated that the SWR at the input port is 1.15:1 or better. Assuming a worst-case of 1.15:1, the reflected power under perfect load conditions at the isolator output would be 0.4867 W or 486.7 mW.

The combination of both reflected powers, the reflected component caused by the mismatch at the antenna and the reflected component caused by the mismatch at the isolator input port, amounts to a difference of only 0.1 dB, approximately. Thus, the most significant contribution of reflected power, in this example, is caused by the isolator input port mismatch.

To further explore the significance of the input port mismatch, assume a worst-case mismatch at the output of the isolator, for instance a shorted connector attached to the isolator output port. As before, 100 W is applied to the input port. With a 0.3 dB insertion loss, 93.3 W appears at the output port. With an isolation of 30 dB, the reflected power at the input port (caused by the mismatch at the output port) will be 0.0933 W or 93.3 mW. This is still much less than the reflected power caused by the mismatch at the input port and will increase the total reflected power seen at the transmitter by less than 1 dB. Note: the dummy load at the load port usually is not large enough to handle this amount of reflected power.

Of course, the above discussion is theoretical. In the real world things change a bit. First, there is the heat factor. The heating caused by normal operation can compromise the performance of the RF isolator. Excessive reflected power will increase the required load dissipation and increase the temperature of the isolator. Consequently, reflected power should be kept to a minimum. Even though the isolator prevents the transmitter from “seeing” most of the reflected power, the isolator is not an impedance matching device. This is worth repeating: the RF isolator is not an impedance matching device! Even so, the RF isolator provides an excellent 50-ohm load impedance to a transmitter.

Manufacturer’s specifications and recommendations should be followed in order to ensure proper operation of the isolator. If the manufacturer states that the isolator should not be mounted on a ferrous metal surface, doing so might significantly detune the isolator and reduce the performance. Also, do not exceed the power input specification rating of the isolator. Power input should be reduced commensurately to keep reflected power at the load port within the limits of the dummy load.

Dual- and even triple-section isolators are available for even greater isolation (Figure 4). Single isolators can be placed in cascade to achieve higher isolation than afforded by a single isolator, but this requires more space and interconnecting cables. Better heat dissipation is one advantage of this configuration. Also, should a single isolator in the cascade fail, it can be replaced at less expense than replacing a dual- or triple-section isolator. Remember that while isolation figures increase, so too does the forward insertion loss with multiple sections or cascades.

Make sure adequate ventilation is provided, even if it means adding an external fan to cool the isolator. Sometimes, the dummy load can be placed away from the isolator via an interconnecting cable. This can reduce the heat near the isolator in the case of significant reflected power. The dummy load should be rated for at least half the transmitter power. For a 100 W transmitter, the dummy load should be rated for at least 50 W. For multi-section isolators, the dummy load connected to the first load port should be rated for at least 50% of the transmitter power output. The remaining loads can be much smaller since they don’t see as much reflected power.

Be sure to follow the output of the isolator(s) with a second-harmonic filter. Do not place the isolator at the output of a transmitter combiner. Each individual transmitter should be followed with an isolator and harmonic filter. Isolators should be used as a matter of standard procedure in order to keep intermod-forming signals out of the transmitter output stage or to significantly reduce the level of intermod products from the transmitter. By using common sense and following manufacturers’ recommendations and specifications, you can get maximum performance and life out of a well-built RF isolator. Next month we will look at field-tuning isolators using various techniques and equipment.

Until next time — stay tuned!

Equation 1:

P=10(-dB/10)×100=10(-0.3/10)×100=0.933×100=93.3%

Equation 2:

R=(S-1/S+1)2=(3-1/3+1)2=(2/4)2=(0.5)2=0.25
where R is reflected power and S is SWR

Table 1:
dB loss Percent power
0.1 97.7
0.2 95.5
0.3 93.3
0.4 91.2
0.5 89.1
0.6 87.1
0.7 85.1
0.8 83.2
0.9 81.3
1.0 79.4
Table 2:
dB loss or isolation Multiplication factor
1 0.794
2 0.631
3 0.501
10 0.1
Tags: RFID content Tracking, Monitoring & Control Wireless Networks

Most Recent


  • Microsoft Outlook vulnerability could be 2023's 'It' bug
    Microsoft recently patched a zero-day vulnerability under active exploit in Microsoft Outlook, identified as CVE-2023-23397, which could enable an attacker to perform a privilege escalation, accessing the victim’s Net-NTLMv2 challenge-response authentication hash and impersonating the user. Now it’s becoming clear that CVE-2023-23397 is dangerous enough to become the most far-reaching bug of the year, security researchers are […]
  • Getting to know the how—and why—of the telecom cloud
    A funny thing happened during the pandemic: The giant cloud hyperscalers burst into the telecom industry. And now it’s time for everyone to get acquainted with them. Why? Well, it seems increasingly inevitable that a certain percentage – ranging from “a little” to “most” – of telecom operators’ network functions are going to run in […]
  • Zipline delivery drone docks, charges by itself
    Zipline has unveiled its new autonomous drone platform, designed to provide accurate everyday delivery to homes in the U.S., including in busy residential areas. Zipline’s previous delivery system worked by parachuting parcels into a specified area. Now the new drone, dubbed Platform 2 or P2 Zip, sends its goods down to customers via a tether […]
  • State and local leaders can alleviate the burden on public-safety personnel by tackling three workforce trends
    Government officials and public safety leaders wear many different hats. They serve as sounding boards for constituent complaints and for new ideas that need vetting. They are change agents charged with improving the lives of citizens and colleagues and are tasked with keeping order. Their most daunting responsibility, however, is keeping members of their community […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • New Orleans-area 911 center inks multiyear APEX deal with Carbyne to replace call-handling system
  • The isolator: An RF traffic director
    Newscan: Feds recover millions from pipeline ransom hackers, hint at U.S. Internet tactic
  • Cyber is the new Cold War, and AI is the arms race
  • Private wireless networks in the US start going public

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

State and local leaders can alleviate the burden on public-safety personnel by tackling three workforce trends dlvr.it/SlBH89

20th March 2023
UrgentComm

6G is shaping up to disappoint, and the industry can blame itself dlvr.it/Sl918J

20th March 2023
UrgentComm

Change is coming to the network detection and response (NDR) market dlvr.it/Sl4cts

18th March 2023
UrgentComm

Telcos need to build businesses, as well as networks dlvr.it/Sl4cRR

18th March 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.