https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


Vendors grab for government cash

Vendors grab for government cash

Today, more money is available for the purchase of public-safety communications equipment thanks to the federal government's emphasis on homeland security
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st September 2004

Today, more money is available for the purchase of public-safety communications equipment thanks to the federal government’s emphasis on homeland security — $2.5 billion to $5 billion just for interoperable digital radios built using the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials’ Project 25 standard, according to one estimate.

Consequently, the companies developing that gear have more opportunity. On the other hand, multiple agencies are now being forced to collaborate on purchasing decisions, adding complexity to a process that once was determined by a single public-safety official or agency.

“The market is big; it’s material and it’s coming. That’s the good news,” said Tom Lambalot, president of SmartLink. “The bad news is the decision-making process has to be much more collaborative; it’s not like there’s a local fire chief or police chief that makes decisions on equipment and functionality.”

Lambalot, cognizant of the communications breakdowns that have snarled multi-agency communications in the past, applauds the government’s focus on interoperable digital technologies for local, county, state and federal agencies.

Still, like others in the vendor community, he longs for the days when a single czar made the decisions. “The more folks you put in a room to drive it to consensus, it stretches the procurement cycle time,” Lambalot said.

While the federal government is throwing money and positive spin at building interoperable communications, it’s debatable whether things are any better since Sept. 11, 2001, when the severity of the situation was revealed. The 9/11 Commission Report, issued in July, underscored the inability of public-safety agencies responding to the crisis at the World Trade Center to communicate with each other.

Not much has changed in the interim, according to Mark Jasin, national sales and marketing manager in Kenwood USA’s Communications Sector. “From a communications standpoint, I don’t know that there would be a much different respondability today as opposed to Sept. 11,” Jasin said.

There are several reasons for the lack of progress. For starters, it’s tough to follow the money trail.

“Both the communications requirement and the funding should be in sync, but that’s not the case today,” Jasin said. “We’ve seen inconsistent flow of funding and inconsistent specs and definitions to get that funding.”

Another factor is that while public-safety communications are on the brink of radical change, such a massive undertaking will take time and effort, as equipment purchases usually have a lifespan ranging from 10 to 15 years and legacy systems aren’t easily retired, particularly when the amortization cycle hasn’t ended.

If that isn’t enough to make vendors grind their teeth, they also must meet the needs of multiple agencies because the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has tied future federal grants to regional cooperation between agencies toward interoperable communications.

“Everyone has to have buy-in,” said Jay Herther, federal market director for M/A-COM. “The biggest roadblock has been getting everybody on the same page and collaborating. They have to pool resources — money and frequencies. It’s sharing.”

However, the public-safety space is not used to sharing.

“Everything used to be local,” Herther said. “Now you have an incident that starts out local, then you bring in state and federal agencies to help, and all of a sudden you have 20 different agencies that need to collaborate and communicate on the scene.”

While the billions of dollars that potentially are up for grabs has drawn a plethora of players seeking a share of the pot, the core group of vendors that have a long history of serving public-safety and government agencies stand to grab the lion’s share of the new money because they understand how things work.

“The government has its own process,” said Dave Storey, president and CEO of RELM Wireless. Integral to that process, according to Storey, is a sales force that has built long-term relationships with key government agencies and the decision-makers within those agencies.

Also crucial is the ability to prove you can build efficient, cost-effective P25 infrastructure, said M/A-COM’s Herther.

“There are probably half a dozen or more people who can supply P25 handsets or portable radios,” he said. “But you still need the M/A-COMs or Motorolas to provide the system.”

Even an experienced company needs allies among the multiple agencies on a regional or local level because “unless you have a technology officer or somebody in the community, you have a lot of difficulty,” said Herther.

Kenwood, for example, uses a dealer network, many of whom are “connected with public-safety agencies” to market its products, Jasin said.

Even though vendors need special connections to sell into a space that is “democratic, but offset by a history of parochialism,” those relationships are not what books the business, Lambalot said. “At the end of the day the solution is what’s going to get you the order,” he said.

While interoperability and standardized digital specifications eventually could open up the marketplace and erode the dominance of players like Motorola, those vendors that compete with the giant weren’t optimistic.

“This land mobile radio industry is totally dominated by Motorola, so most of the specs get written around the dominant player,” Storey said. “We have to convince people that our products are as good.”

On the other hand, veterans aren’t worried about the gaggle of starry-eyed outsiders looking for a piece of the homeland security action.

“A start-up coming in might have a novel [piece of technology], but I think they would be challenged by not having a lot of longevity,” said Lambalot.

But where there’s money, there’s aggression, and already some companies have found novel ways to wedge into the game. “It’s a cottage industry just to handle homeland security funds for people. There are companies that will offer services to get homeland security money and process it,” said Jasin.

The market for the actual equipment is exponentially bigger, according to Storey. “The [Integrated Wireless Network] is a $2.5 billion to $5 billion opportunity over the next five to 10 years,” said Storey. “The ultimate goal of this system is to enable you to come to any horrific event that occurs, and no matter what radios you have all will be able to communicate.”

It’s the long-term goal that everyone — vendors, public-safety agencies and the people with the money to spend — would like to see come about sooner rather than later.

JUSTICE GRANTS 2003

Los Angeles $6.0 million
San Jose, Calif. $3.7 million
Orange County, Fla. $6.0 million
Indianapolis $6.0 million
Louisville, Ky. $6.0 million
New Orleans $5.5 million
Boston $3.2 million
Baltimore $5.1 million
Kansas City, Mo. $2.7 million
Newark, N.J. $2.8 million
Las Vegas $6.0 million
Nassau County, N.Y. $6.0 million
Columbus, Ohio $2.5 million
Houston $4.9 million
Source: U.S. Department of Justice

HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS 2003

Conway, Ark. $2.1 million
Rehoboth Beach, Del. $2.4 million
St. Clair County, Ill. $6.0 million
Woodbury County, Iowa $6.0 million
Worcester County, Md. $5.6 million
Monroe County, Mich. $6.0 million
Ramsey County, Minn. $6.0 million
Independence, Mo. $5.5 million
Lewis and Clark County, Mont. $4.5 million
Grafton County, N.H. $2.2 million
Erie County, N.Y. $6.0 million
Tulsa, Okla. $846,263
Westmoreland County, Pa. $6.0 million
Narragansett, R.I. $3.0 million
Charlottesville/Albemarle
County/UVA, Va. $6.0 million
Clallam County, Wash. $5.8 million
Harrison County, W.Va. $5.7 million
Source: U.S. Department of Justice

on the web:

For more information on the developments that are shaping the land mobile radio and private wireless markets, check out our Web site:
WWW.IWCE-MRT.COM.COM

Tags: Regulation content Policy

Most Recent


  • NG911 supporter Eshoo announces she will not seek reelection to Congress in 2024
    Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), a longtime supporter of federal funding to help public-safety answering points (PSAPs) transition to next-generation 911 (NG911) technology, last week announced that she will not seek reelection to Congress in 2024 but plans to serve out her current term through January 2025. Eshoo, 80, was elected to Congress for the first […]
  • GSMA calls for EU 'fair share' and mergers support amid traffic growth
    The GSMA has backed ‘fair share’ demands for Big Tech to contribute to network costs and called for more European Union leniency on telco mergers in the latest version of its annual European Mobile Economy Report, which forecasts continued growth in data traffic with 5G adoption. The report from the non-profit group forecasts that mobile data […]
  • AI-powered robot dogs tested to find explosive devices
    The U.K. government recently hosted a hackathon to test the use of AI-enabled robot dogs for bomb disposal tasks, reporting promising results. Organized by the Defence AI Center (DAIC), the hackathon saw 40 programmers leveraging AI and robotics to complete several hazardous tasks that would otherwise be undertaken by Army bomb disposal experts. Throughout the […]
  • Report: Mayors are interested in generative AI, but adoption rates remain low
    There’s been a lot of focus in recent months on artificial intelligence (AI) and its many possible applications, from self-driving cars to manufacturing efficiencies. City administrators are likewise exploring the ways AI can improve the quality of life and safety of their constituents, and the effectiveness of public services. New research from Bloomberg Philanthropies in […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • New Orleans-area 911 center inks multiyear APEX deal with Carbyne to replace call-handling system
  • Vendors grab for government cash
    Newscan: Feds recover millions from pipeline ransom hackers, hint at U.S. Internet tactic
  • Cyber is the new Cold War, and AI is the arms race
  • Private wireless networks in the US start going public

Commentary


Land mobile radio (LMR) systems are just as vulnerable to cyberattacks as any other networks used in the public-safety sector. Here’s what to do about it.

  • 1
7th November 2023

September 3GPP Plenary meetings feature Release 18 progress, Release 19 beginnings

13th October 2023

Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.