https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Call Center/Command


UWB brings radio’s future closer

UWB brings radio’s future closer

Fast-developing, spectrum-friendly technologies could hasten development of smart radios
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st November 2004

Software-defined radio, software radio and cognitive radio are futuristic concepts that promise to significantly impact wireless communications technologies. Today, however, technology ironically is one of the limiting factors in the production of a true software radio that is capable of dynamically reconfiguring itself to meet user requirements or spectral limitations.

Specifically, the lack of analog-to-digital converters and digital-to-analog converters fast enough to implement a software or cognitive radio will delay their deployment. Fortunately, fast-developing ultrawideband (UWB) technologies might provide the solution to this dilemma.

An outgrowth of military research into flexible radio architectures, the software-defined radio (SDR) concept has been around for many years and represents a change in architectural concepts for a radio receiver. Super-heterodyne receivers typically perform the majority of a radio receiver’s functions in the analog domain, using specifically designed hardware, with analog-to-digital conversion — if it happens at all — taking place in the final stages of reception. In the case of an SDR, the functions following the radio frequency (RF) down-conversion are software-based and typically performed by a dedicated high-speed processor or a digital signal processor.

The complexities of the RF front end and the speed limitations of today’s ADCs and DACs mandate an SDR switch between different RF front-ends in order to span different RF bands or operate with different RF front-end requirements. This is the kind of implementation that is utilized in today’s SDRs.

Figure 1 illustrates the differences between a conventional super-heterodyne receiver, a software-defined receiver and a software radio (SWR). The purpose of an SDR is to dynamically change both frequency of interest and modulation scheme of interest. Current SDRs change frequency of interest by switching between RF front ends and change modulation schemes by implementing different algorithms in the processor portion of the receiver. Limitations of both ADCs and digital signal processors (DSPs) force a typical SDR design, such as that used in the U.S. military’s Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS), to implement multiple RF modules to cover the different frequency bands and technologies required.

The concept of a SWR is a step beyond that of an SDR. In an SWR, the signal is digitized at the antenna, and all of the radio functions are implemented in software that runs on a high-speed processor or DSP. Capable of utilizing different bands and different modes of operation, an SWR is adaptable and upgradeable through the modification of its software, i.e., new functions, modulation schemes or capabilities may be added by introducing the appropriate software.

For example, an SWR that is currently designed to operate on a PCS frequency band utilizing a CDMA waveform could be upgraded to utilize a wideband CDMA signal on a European frequency band, all through the addition of new software. SWR receivers represent the ultimate in a reconfigurable radio receiver architecture that is dynamically alterable and able to adapt to different technologies based upon the software loaded into them. While limitations in DAC and ADC technologies have kept SWRs from realizing their full potential, that should change as digital technologies continue to evolve and improve.

Cognitive radio (CR) represents the next step. A CR takes the adaptability and reprogrammability of an SWR and adds to it the capability to sense its environment and react in the most appropriate manner. For example, a CR operating in an unlicensed band in the U.S. might begin operations in the bands around 2 GHz using an 802.11b waveform, but upon determining that the spectrum in its current location was saturated with other users, the CR would switch to frequencies in the 5 GHz range and instead utilize an 802.11a waveform, all on its own and without user intervention.

As Joseph Mitola III stated in a dissertation delivered to Stockholm’s Royal Institute of Technology in May 2000, “Cognitive radio increases the awareness that computational entities in radios have of their locations, users, networks and the larger environment.”

A CR would dynamically support a user’s throughput requirements, be they bandwidth-, delay-, or jitter-specific, without a user’s intervention. Such radios would help to fully utilize available bandwidth by dynamically adapting to the spectrum in a real-time manner and would be able to offer a user bandwidth on demand, dynamically choosing the most appropriate air interface based upon an understanding of geoposition, spectrum rules, spectral occupancy and a host of other parameters. However, as with SWRs, a true cognitive radio cannot be realized today because of the limitations of digital technologies.

UWB technologies are a fairly new development in the wireless domain, and they present a variety of possible implementations. The FCC has decided upon two definitions for UWB technologies. The first defines a UWB signal as any signal having a fractional bandwidth (Bf) greater than 20%, where:

The second defines a UWB signal as any signal that has a total bandwidth equal to or greater than 500 MHz, regardless of fractional bandwidth.

These definitions do not consider how the UWB signal is generated or the type of modulation that is used with the UWB signal. Figure 2 shows the wide variety of signals that meet the FCC’s UWB definition. This leaves a great deal of room for a system developer to implement a UWB radio. In fact, a wide variety of UWB systems have now been proposed. These systems range from systems utilizing impulses to generate UWB spectral content to orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems that utilize a large number of carriers to span more than 500 MHz worth of bandwidth.

Ultrawideband modulation techniques span a wide range of possibilities, including pulse-position modulation, pulse-duration modulation, pulse-amplitude modulation and pulse-phase modulation. Many other techniques have been proposed and more are possible, with the only limitations stemming from the physics of the radio channel.

Because the technology has only recently been approved for use in the U.S., UWB system design is in the beginning stages, with several different standards having been proposed but none having been accepted to date. With UWB technologies still in a nascent stage, the potential for innovation is great; consequently, these technologies could offer unique opportunities for the implementation of SWR and CR concepts.

For instance, because impulsive UWB technologies essentially are digital in nature — without the attending complexities of RF front-end designs — a variety of such technologies potentially could be realized with the same chipset. For example, a direct-sequence UWB impulse train could be generated with a chipset that also would be capable of implementing a time-hopping UWB waveform.

It should be possible to implement a variety of impulsive waveforms, and their associated modulation techniques, entirely in software. This would essentially create an impulsive software radio. Such a radio would be capable of dynamically changing its waveform based upon need, thus reducing the UWB physical layer interface to a software abstraction. It also would be capable of implementing different impulsive physical layers based upon the specific operating environment in which the radio found itself.

While the implementation of a software UWB radio is a realizable goal today thanks to the existence of programmable pulse generators and fast ADCs, implementing a cognitive UWB radio would require some new development work centered around the creation of spectrum-sensing capabilities, spectrum-sharing protocols and dynamic waveform selection algorithms. It should be possible to modify algorithms that are currently being developed for traditional cognitive radios and utilize them in a cognitive UWB radio, thereby benefiting from the work previously accomplished in this domain.

The ultimate goal of a CR capable of dynamically reacting to the spectral environment by seamlessly implementing any waveform through the modification of its software algorithm is limited by current technology and therefore will not be available for several years. However, a cognitive UWB radio, able to rapidly react to the spectral environment and dynamically change its waveform, is one that may be realizable with only slight modifications of today’s existing technology.

John Santoff is founder and chief technology officer of Pulse~Link. He is the chief architect of Pulse~Link’s UWB technology with more than 25 years experience in electronics and communications. Douglas Cummings is a research engineer for Pulse~Link, researching technologies in support of the company’s business and technology goals. He has more than 14 years of experience in the communication field in a variety of roles.

Tags: Call Center/Command content Wireless Networks

Most Recent


  • Cyberattack closes emergency rooms in three states
    Ardent Health says it was the target of a cyberattack over Thanksgiving, in an incident that shut down the hospital operator’s emergency rooms in three states. The hospital operator, which oversees 30 hospitals in the U.S., said the attack was detected on the morning of Nov. 23 and was identified as a ransomware attack impacting […]
  • General Electric, DARPA hack claims raise national-security concerns
    General Electric and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) have reportedly been breached, according to claims on the Dark Web that the organizations’ highly sensitive stolen data is up for sale. A screen capture from the Dark Web ad shows a threat actor named IntelBroker selling access credentials, DARPA-related military information, SQL files, and more. GE confirmed to […]
  • More 2G and 3G shutdowns loom in the U.S.
    UScellular and Cellcom recently set dates to shutter their aging wireless networks. The smaller network operators are following in the footsteps of their bigger, nationwide rivals, which are making similar moves. On its website, UScellular said it would shutter its 3G CDMA network on January 14, 2024. “Major wireless carriers have already shut down their […]
  • Report: Local cybersecurity programs are facing headwinds as threats, technologies evolve
    The evolving technological landscape isn’t just changing the nation’s social and economic norms, it’s also pushing local governments to adapt. A new analysis from the Public Technology Institute provides a snapshot of the challenges local cybersecurity programs are facing, and the priorities of city and county administrators as they guide organizations through an unprecedented era […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • New Orleans-area 911 center inks multiyear APEX deal with Carbyne to replace call-handling system
  • UWB brings radio’s future closer
    Newscan: Feds recover millions from pipeline ransom hackers, hint at U.S. Internet tactic
  • Cyber is the new Cold War, and AI is the arms race
  • Private wireless networks in the US start going public

Commentary


Land mobile radio (LMR) systems are just as vulnerable to cyberattacks as any other networks used in the public-safety sector. Here’s what to do about it.

  • 1
7th November 2023

September 3GPP Plenary meetings feature Release 18 progress, Release 19 beginnings

13th October 2023

Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.