https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


Public safety’s conundrum

Public safety’s conundrum

In the aftermath of watershed events such as the Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, news stories and congressional testimony have focused
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st February 2006

In the aftermath of watershed events such as the Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, news stories and congressional testimony have focused on the failures of public-safety communications systems. The discussions have included such topics as operability, interoperability, system resilience, redundancy and hardening of networks.

At a wireless industry conference last September, Morgan O’Brien, the co-founder and former vice chairman of Nextel Communications, characterized public-safety communications in the U.S. as “a total disgrace.” In several subsequent articles, O’Brien stated he was “obsessed” with finding solutions to the above challenges.

In a recent telephone interview, O’Brien told me he was disappointed that he had not done more to find such solutions, adding that if he and others had worked harder at it, perhaps public-safety communications would have performed better during some of the recent catastrophes.

He also didn’t back off his “total disgrace” comment. According to O’Brien, public safety has the most demanding set of requirements, but the sector is small compared with the overall wireless marketplace and does not provide the economy of scale needed to provide affordable systems that deliver what first responders “need and deserve.” O’Brien made it clear he wasn’t denigrating the progress made by public-safety communications but rather was focused on finding more effective solutions than currently exist.

O’Brien — who is scheduled to deliver the keynote address at IWCE 2006 (www.iwceexpo.com) in Las Vegas in May — further emphasized that public-safety communications is in a “state of conundrum,” with a conflict between needs/requirements and the present economy of scale. Based on this premise, public safety never will be able to afford the state-of-the-art technology readily available in the general commercial wireless market.

He added that the answer to these serious challenges isn’t for the federal government to “write a colossal check.” That would do nothing to change the status quo, nor would it inspire innovation, he said.

O’Brien — who recently was named by location-based services vendor SquareLoop as chairman of its advisory board — makes a lot of sense. It is obvious that the present paradigm is broken. Moreover, several recurring themes have emerged from stakeholders focused on this critically important issue, including the following:

  • Procurement of public-safety radio systems is tedious, localized and expensive. It also requires much time on the part of public-safety personnel. This preserves the conundrum.

  • Radio communications technology purchased today generally is obsolete as soon as it is purchased and often has far less features than what can be accessed on commercial wireless phones.

  • Maintenance on new digital trunked radio systems requires a higher degree of expertise and is much more expensive.

  • The present method of radio-system procurement does not necessarily ensure interoperability with other localities, agencies or entities.

  • New and existing radio systems today have a specific lifespan that generally requires an expensive and revolving replacement. Generally, these systems do not evolve. Most of the public-safety leaders that I’ve spoken with do not wish to go through the process of finding the money for future radio system replacement.

  • Although millions of dollars have been — and will be — awarded to public safety for communications, these funds may or may not achieve the desired outcome.

  • P25 is not the panacea for public-safety communications.

As if to reinforce the paradigm question, a reader responding to a column that editor Glenn Bischoff wrote in the Nov. 18, 2004, MRT Bulletin, this publication’s weekly e-newsletter, effectively summarized the current situation and offered a potential solution.

“We have now been talking about the need for interoperable radios for more than three decades — after every big fire, every big tornado, every big flood, every big town-line-crossing disaster — and we still don’t have those mythical, dreamed-for interoperable radios,” the reader stated. “Across the country, every small town, sheriff’s department, fire house and ambulance service still acts as its own little fiefdom, with its own little budget, its own little politics, its own little petty jealousies, its own little unique purchasing requirements. … Perhaps we need a little bit of regulation.

“Such regulation should stipulate that public-safety agencies won’t get a single penny of state or federal money, for any computer or communication system, unless it is fully standards-compliant, fully E911-compliant [and] fully capable of communicating with every emergency-response agency, every adjacent town, [and] every adjacent county.”

During a floor speech addressing interoperable communications on Sept. 13, 2005, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) stated, “Congress has also begun to fund the purchase of interoperable communications equipment for localities. Some 50,000 local, state and federal agencies make independent decisions about communications systems and use various frequencies. This is unacceptable and a waste of government resources.”

Clearly, a different approach must be taken to improve the state of public-safety communications in the U.S. In 2004, the Department of Homeland Security’s Project SAFECOM released its first Statement of Requirements (SoR) for public-safety wireless communications. I was one of many first responders (police, fire and EMS) who participated in a collective forum to develop a document that outlined operational needs and desires for such communications.

The document focuses on the functional incident/scenario-based applications while trying to avoid defining any specific technological solutions. The idea is to direct innovators, manufacturers and vendors to develop the most efficient and cost-effective means to provide the technology to meet these needs.

Although the SoR gives the basis for reinventing public-safety wireless communications, much more must be accomplished. Looking forward, we all will benefit from encouraging innovators and entrepreneurs to contact Morgan O’Brien and join this spirit of exploration into the possibilities that may lead to a brave new world of more effective public-safety communications.


Charles Werner is a 28-year veteran of the fire service and presently serves as chief of the Charlottesville (Va.) Fire Department. He serves on several state and federal interoperability groups.

Tags: content Policy

Most Recent


  • AT&T wireless growth keyed by FirstNet—now provides 24,000 agencies with 4.4 million connections
    AT&T this week reported that FirstNet ended 2022 supporting more than 24,000 public-safety agencies with “about” 4.4 million connections, including 377,000 connections that were added during the last three months of 2022—a total that represents more than half of the carrier’s post-paid wireless growth for the quarter. AT&T officials released these figures in conjunction with […]
  • Report: Remote work causing offices to empty, but walkable cities still in high demand
    Given the reliance on vehicular transportation in the United States, some American cities historically haven’t prioritized being walkable in past planning and or design. But amid an unprecedented shift in the economy toward remote work, those that have are increasingly desirable for prospective residents. A new report from Smart Growth American and Places Platform, “Foot Traffic Ahead […]
  • Federal agencies infested by cyberattackers via legit remote-management systems
    It has come to light that hackers cleverly utilized two off-the-shelf remote monitoring and management systems (RMMs) to breach multiple Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agency networks in the US last summer. On Jan. 25, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), National Security Agency (NSA), and Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) released […]
  • How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient
    It’s a scenario we’ve all experienced: an ambulance with a blaring siren racing against time to get a person in medical distress to a hospital through traffic. What we don’t see is 5G connectivity enabling paramedics to communicate with hospital staff via video conference and coordinate care in real-time before arriving at the emergency room. […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Public safety’s conundrum
    Newscan: Video decision cited as one reason for Portland crowd-control unit’s mass resignation
  • Robot-bus trial succeeds ... mostly
  • NENA does not oppose $15 billion NG911 proposal, but wants language ‘corrected,’ CEO says
  • Cars, Medicine, Electric Grids: Future hackers will hit much more than networks in an IT/OT integrated world

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

AT&T wireless growth keyed by FirstNet—now provides 24,000 agencies with 4.4 million connections dlvr.it/ShY5qH

27th January 2023
UrgentComm

Report: Remote work causing offices to empty, but walkable cities still in high demand dlvr.it/ShXM7Z

27th January 2023
UrgentComm

AT&T FirstNet unleashes robotic dogs for emergency services dlvr.it/ShW7p8

27th January 2023
UrgentComm

Federal agencies infested by cyberattackers via legit remote-management systems dlvr.it/ShVhn3

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient dlvr.it/ShVS1h

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

MCPTT interworking for critical communications dlvr.it/ShTm3P

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

Self-driving cars present terrorism risk, FBI director says dlvr.it/ShTTHx

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

UK Home Office officially will cut ESN ties with Motorola Solutions in December dlvr.it/ShNjfN

24th January 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.