https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Wireless Networks


The ins and outs of traffic engineering

The ins and outs of traffic engineering

Let's start with a little quiz: Rocky Mountain Radio Co. operates three community repeaters, one for each of its three customers: Poudre Plumbing, Monument
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st August 2006

Let’s start with a little quiz: Rocky Mountain Radio Co. operates three community repeaters, one for each of its three customers: Poudre Plumbing, Monument Mudjacking and Castle Concrete. Poudre and Monument have complained about a high rate of blocked calls during their respective busy hours. Rocky Mountain’s owner, Rick Salazar, pulled two weeks of call records on the three companies, the results of which are defined in Table 1.

Call-seconds are the average number of seconds the repeater is occupied during the busy hour. (There are 3600 seconds in one hour.) Because these customers operate exclusively during weekdays, Rick excluded the call data from the weekends.

Rick figured his only option was to acquire another frequency pair each for Poudre and Monument and ask these customers to somehow split their radio users into two smaller groups. He knew this solution would be unpopular because both companies employ a single dispatch channel, and the owners were fond of monitoring the radio channel. He also was worried that if Castle discovered their blocked call rate was 20%, they might start complaining, too.

Rick’s radio salesman offered to solve this problem by selling Rocky Mountain a trunked radio system. The salesman said he could reduce the blocked call rate to below 10% without additional radio channels. Rick was skeptical.

What should Rick do?

a. Try to get more channels. The salesman just wants to sell expensive equipment to pay for his swimming pool.

b. Ask the customers to schedule non-essential calls for periods before and after the busy hour.

c. Buy the trunked radio system.

The correct answer is (c). Why? Because the salesman knew the efficiency created by a trunked radio system (i.e., the “trunking efficiency”) would eliminate the need for more channels.

We’ll get to the math in a moment, but for now, let’s appeal to the reader’s intuition: Let’s say the trunked radio system employs one control channel and two traffic channels. Today, blocking occurs whenever two or more users attempt to access the repeater simultaneously. The probability of this event is relatively high, but with the trunked system, blocking occurs only when three or more users attempt to access the trunked system simultaneously. Even with three customers sharing two channels, the probability of blocking is reduced to less than 20%. (We’ll prove this result shortly.)

For such a small system, an alternative approach would be to employ a trunking protocol that uses overhead on each traffic channel for control signals rather than dedicate an entire radio channel for this purpose. Such a system would reduce blocking further, to less than 10% (as the salesman claimed).

Now for the math:

Traffic engineering predates land mobile radio and first was applied to telephone systems in the early 20th century by the father of tele-traffic theory, Agner Erlang (1878-1929).

Erlang graduated from the University of Copenhagen in 1901 with a degree in mathematics and taught school for several years before joining the Copenhagen Telephone Co. in 1908. There he began to apply probability theory to various telephone switching problems. He published his first paper on these problems, titled “The Theory of Probability and Telephone Conversations,” in 1909. In 1917, he published a formula for call blocking and waiting time that soon was used by telephone companies worldwide, including the British Post Office and AT&T.

The most widely accepted traffic model for mobile radio is the multiserver loss system, also called the Erlang loss system in honor of its founder. Under this model, voice users arrive at the switch according to a Poisson random process with rate λ. There are m servers (channels), each with independent, identically distributed service times. Arrivals who find all m servers busy are turned away and lost to the system. (They get a busy signal.) No queuing of arrivals is allowed. Service times (call durations) are exponentially distributed with mean 1/µ.

For an m server system, the probability that k servers are busy is given by Equation 1 on page 44. Note that Equation 1 is a function of the ratio λ/µ. This quantity is called the offered traffic, and although unitless, it is measured in Erlangs. Think of the offered traffic as the mean number of users who request service during some busy hour.

The mean number of busy servers is given by Equation 2, where Pm is the probability that m servers are busy. The probability Pm is known also as the blocking probability, Pb.

Now let’s apply Equations 1 and 2 to our previous example from the Rocky Mountain Radio Co. The offered traffic, λ/µ, is found for each customer by solving Equation 2 with the mean number of busy channels, E[K], equal to the ratio of call-seconds — as defined in Table 1 — to 3600.

Next, we will sum the offered traffic from the three customers and compute the probability of blocking for our hypothetical three-channel trunked radio system. First, we need to know the total offered traffic for a common busy hour. Poudre and Castle have the same busy hour (0800-0900), but Monument’s busy hour is different (1000-1100). Rick looked at the traffic data again and found the busiest hour for the sum of the three customers was in fact 0800-0900, but during this hour, Monument Mudjacking had just 513 call seconds with a blocking rate of 14.5%. From Equation 2, the offered traffic in this case is 0.17 Erlangs. The total offered traffic for the system-wide busy hour is (1500+600+900)/3600 = 0.83 Erlangs.

Using an offered traffic of 0.83 Erlangs and m=2 (the third channel is the control channel) in Equation 1, we get a probability of blocked calls of 16%. Not great, but an improvement nonetheless. If we employed a more efficient trunking protocol that used overhead on the traffic channel for control signaling rather than a dedicated control channel, we might increase the overall offered traffic to 1.0 Erlang, but the number of traffic channels would increase to m=3. In this case, Equation 1 gives a blocking probability of just 6.3%.

An Erlang C system is similar to Erlang B, but an Erlang C system allows queuing of incoming calls to reduce or eliminate the probability of blocking. Of course, the tradeoff is longer wait time. The Erlang C formula [1] computes the probability that a user will enter the queue as opposed to being blocked. In fact, as long as the queue size is sufficiently large, the probability of blocking is negligible.

In queuing systems, the two most important parameters are the probability of entering the queue (versus being served immediately) and the mean wait time in the queue. For a given offered traffic and number of servers, the probability of entering the queue is always higher than the probability of being blocked on an equivalent Erlang B system.

Queuing presents some implementation problems. In practice, many users cannot distinguish between a queue tone and a no-service tone, so they typically un-key the radio and must key again anyway. In this case, resources are tied up during queuing and the network might perform better without queuing. Another complication is that some users have priority queuing, making the analysis more difficult.


Jay Jacobsmeyer is president of Pericle Communications Co., a consulting engineering firm located in Colorado Springs, Colo. He holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech and Cornell University, respectively, and has more than 20 years experience as a radio frequency engineer.

References:

  1. Bell Labs, Engineering and Operations in the Bell System, AT&T, 1977.

  2. D.R. Cox and W.L. Smith, Queues, London; Chapman and Hall, 1961.

Table 1
Occurrence of Blocked Calls
Customer Busy Hour Call-Seconds Blocked Calls
Poudre Plumbing 0800-0900 1050 30%
Monument Mudjacking 1000-1100 900 25%
Castle Concrete 0800-0900 720 20%
Tags: Call Center/Command content Wireless Networks

Most Recent


  • FCC approves new processes, spectrum to support space-based communications
    FCC commissioners today passed new rules that are designed to enable more satellite and other space-based endeavors by streamlining the application processes associated with such initiatives and by establishing a more predictable spectrum regime for launches. Commissioners indicated that these two items were passed in an effort to ensure that FCC rules and processes do […]
  • FBI, CISA issue joint warning on 'Snatch' ransomware-as-a-service
    Cybersecurity advisories from the FBI and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) are usually a good indication that a particular threat merits priority attention from organizations in the crosshairs. That would appear to be the case with “Snatch,” a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operation that has been active since at least 2018 and is the […]
  • Huawei hacked by U.S., according to China spy agency
    It’s back to 2019 on Huawei, with the US and China exchanging barbs and the Chinese firm accused of skirting US export rules. China foreign affairs spokesperson Mao Ning Wednesday assailed the US for “overstretching” the concept of national security in order to discriminate against Chinese companies. She rejected a complaint by Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo over […]
  • Driverless-car crashes less frequent, cause less damage, according to insurance research
    Waymo is using insurance data to demonstrate that its self-driving taxis are safer than human-driven vehicles. The company, owned by Google parent Alphabet, has published research led by insurer Swiss Re that it says shows how driverless vehicles crash less frequently and do less damage than those piloted by humans. The study comes at a pivotal moment […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • The battle over connected cars drags on
  • UK officials revamp ESN plans again, target Airwave-to-LTE transition for end of 2026
  • PSCR: Dereck Orr highlights features of June 21-24 virtual event
  • FirstNet buildout on pace for March 2023 completion, AT&T official says

Commentary


Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023

Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.