https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Call Center/Command


Solving in-building coverage problems

Solving in-building coverage problems

Over the last two decades, a major shift has occurred in land mobile radio, as users have migrated from VHF and UHF systems to 700, 800 and 900 MHz systems.
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st October 2006

Over the last two decades, a major shift has occurred in land mobile radio, as users have migrated from VHF and UHF systems to 700, 800 and 900 MHz systems. This has created a problem, as signals in the higher frequencies offer poor building-penetration characteristics. Consequently, booster amplifiers now are widely used to improve coverage inside buildings, tunnels, stadiums, and parking garages.

The cellular radio industry also employs indoor and underground amplifier systems, but for somewhat different reasons. A cellular radio network is a frequency-reuse network. To increase the number of users per square mile per MHz, the cellular operator must use terrain and clutter to squeeze cell sites closer together without causing harmful co-channel interference. This close spacing necessarily means short towers — and short towers mean poor building penetration.

This lack of building penetration creates the need for the distributed antenna system (DAS), a more sophisticated version of the booster amplifier. Let’s examine the booster amplifier first, and then the DAS.

The FCC allows the use of booster amplifiers in the 800 MHz and other bands provided the amplifier is used to fill coverage gaps inside the FCC-licensed service contour. The amplifier cannot be used to extend coverage outside the service contour. Booster amplifiers fall into two main categories: narrowband — or channelized — amplifiers (Class A), and broadband amplifiers (Class B).

Channelized amplifiers are designed to amplify only a single 25 kHz or 12.5 kHz channel, and are limited by the FCC to output power of 5 W per channel (37 dBm). Broadband amplifiers are designed to amplify the entire band or large portions of the band and also are limited to 5 W per channel. Moreover, broadband amplifiers are governed by FCC Part 90.219(d), which states the following:

Class B broadband signal boosters are permitted to be used only in confined or indoor areas such as buildings, tunnels, underground areas, etc., or in remote areas where there is little or no risk of interference to other users.

One would be hard pressed to find a case where an outdoor broadband booster amplifier is sufficiently isolated so that it would not cause interference to other users. Thus, it is rare to find broadband booster amplifiers used outdoors. Rather, because booster amplifiers operate at relatively low output power and are usually installed with relatively low antenna heights, they are designed to cover indoor areas, or very small, isolated outdoor areas (a few blocks at most). To be useful, booster amplifiers must be high gain — 70 dB to 90 dB, typically.

To prevent harmful feedback, it is necessary to create significant isolation between the donor antenna and the coverage antenna, which is a challenge because they must be installed on the same building or tower. Directional antennas, vertical antenna separation, horizontal antenna separation, and building blockage are used to achieve this isolation.

Booster amplifiers require a donor signal, which usually is captured directly from the main transmitter site using a directional antenna. However, over-the-air booster amplifiers are a major cause of 800 MHz interference. And because booster amplifiers are not separately licensed, tracking down the interference source is difficult and time-consuming. To provide greater isolation, it is possible to feed the booster amplifier via fiber-optic cable or microwave radio and — in a perfect world — all booster amplifiers would have dedicated donor systems using these technologies. But such a dedicated donor system is more costly.

Broadband and channelized booster amplifiers are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The following are some of the advantages and limitations of each type of booster amplifier.

Broadband amplifiers:

  • Less expensive than channelized amplifiers.

  • Less group delay (wider filters), so less chance of delay-spread problems.

  • Practical power limitation means low power per channel for multi-channel systems.

  • Because it is broadband, it amplifies nearby ESMR and Cellular A Band signals, robbing the licensee’s channels of power and creating the potential for co-channel interference to ESMR and cellular subscribers in the immediate area.

  • Potential for harmful IM products in public-safety, SMR or cellular bands.

Channelized amplifiers:

  • Depending on vendor, can have greater power per channel for multi-channel systems

  • Greater adjacent channel isolation

  • Less interference to other cellular and public-safety systems

  • Fewer FCC limitations on where they can be used

  • More expensive because one amplifier is required for each channel

  • Large group delay causes delay spread in overlap areas. Typical group delay is 60 to 120 microseconds. Symbol period on a 9600 bits per second FSK control channel is 104.2 microseconds, so this is a genuine problem.

Now let’s consider the more modern solution to the indoor coverage problem: the DAS.

Distributed antenna system really is a generic term that includes all distributed amplifier systems, but the term recently has been associated with modern amplifier systems that use fiber-optic cable and CAT-5/6 twisted-pair cable to distribute wireless signals inside buildings. To understand the advantages of these modern systems, it helps to first understand the disadvantages of the traditional booster amplifier, also known as the bidirectional amplifier (BDA).

A traditional BDA is shown in Figure 3. Such a system uses a single amplifier in each direction (collectively the BDA) and distributes the signal using coaxial cable and either discrete antennas or radiating cable, or both. The big problem with the traditional BDA is the large amount of large diameter coaxial cable that is required. Relative to fiber and CAT-5, this cable is expensive, heavy, and requires special skills to install. Typically, the building infrastructure is not equipped to handle this specialized cable and the installation cost tends to be high.

Another problem with the traditional BDA is that relatively high losses on coaxial cable at 800 and 1900 MHz require additional amplifiers downstream. Each amplifier in series further limits the dynamic range of the system, making it more likely that a user will overdrive the system, or that a user in a weak area will not be able to overcome thermal noise in the uplink due to a high noise figure.

The alternative to the traditional BDA is the modern DAS, which uses fiber-optic cable and CAT-5/6 twisted-pair cable. A typical architecture for such a DAS is shown in Figure 4.

Note from Figure 4 that a BD still is required to boost the signal to a level acceptable to the main amplifier unit (MAU) if an over-the-air donor antenna is used. If the MAU is co-located with the cellular operator’s base station radio, a BDA is not needed and the operator simply dedicates one sector to the DAS. Fiber-optic cable is used to distribute the signal over the relatively long distance between the MAU and the expansion amplifier, which is located in an intermediate distribution frame (IDF) closet. Fiber is preferred because typical loss is less than 1 dB per mile, versus 1 dB per 100 feet for 7/8-inch diameter coaxial cable. There is a tradeoff, however. Fiber amplifiers are noisy and result in a relatively high noise figure on the uplink.

At the expansion amplifier, the signal is down-converted to the VHF band to limit losses over the CAT-5/6 twisted-pair cable. At the antenna amplifier unit (AAU), the signal is up-converted back to the original radio frequency. The small AAU is powered over the CAT-5/6 cable and is located in the ceiling tile, only a few feet from the antenna. On the uplink, the signal is down-converted at the AAU, passed over the CAT-5/6 cable, and up-converted at the expansion amplifier.

At this point, the reader might assume that the modern DAS operates on analog signals, which is true in many cases. However, at least one company markets a DAS that is all-digital but still uses an architecture similar to that depicted in Figure 4. One advantage of this digital DAS is that the signal is regenerated at each amplifier. Thus, there is no loss in signal quality provided the signal-to-noise ratio is adequate at each amplifier. However, it should be noted that a digital DAS introduces several technology challenges, including difficulty in achieving high dynamic range.


Jay Jacobsmeyer is president of Pericle Communications Co., a consulting engineering firm located in Colorado Springs, Colo. He holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech and Cornell University, respectively, and has more than 25 years experience as a radio frequency engineer.

Tags: Call Center/Command content Tower & Site Wireless Networks

Most Recent


  • AT&T FirstNet unleashes robotic dogs for emergency services
    AT&T is releasing robotic hounds from Ghost Robotics as part of the service provider’s FirstNet emergency responder service. In a blog, AT&T VP Lance Spencer explained that the robotic dogs will be connected to AT&T’s network and deployed for public safety, defense, federal and state agencies, local police and fire departments, and commercial customers. “Network-connected robotic dogs can deliver a […]
  • Federal agencies infested by cyberattackers via legit remote-management systems
    It has come to light that hackers cleverly utilized two off-the-shelf remote monitoring and management systems (RMMs) to breach multiple Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agency networks in the US last summer. On Jan. 25, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), National Security Agency (NSA), and Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) released […]
  • How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient
    It’s a scenario we’ve all experienced: an ambulance with a blaring siren racing against time to get a person in medical distress to a hospital through traffic. What we don’t see is 5G connectivity enabling paramedics to communicate with hospital staff via video conference and coordinate care in real-time before arriving at the emergency room. […]
  • MCPTT interworking for critical communications
    The goal of mission-critical communication systems is to minimize the response time of first responders in emergency situations across several agencies. A dedicated push-to-talk button offers an efficient mechanism that simplifies the speaker-to-listener process to a minimum. This feature is useful when coordinating large group activities and to enable the instant flow of tactical status […]

One comment

  1. Avatar marque2 6th November 2013 @ 3:22 pm
    Reply

    So why do emergency units use
    So why do emergency units use UHF in Cities because it has better building penetration, and VHF in the country?

    I think this UHF not penetrating is a Internet Myth.

    Granted if two weak signals of the same strength enter a building the VHF signal will propogate further and therefore seem to penetrate better – but I think the real reason you need these repeaters is because higher frequencies have lower range.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Solving in-building coverage problems
    Newscan: Feds recover millions from pipeline ransom hackers, hint at U.S. Internet tactic
  • Cyber is the new Cold War, and AI is the arms race
  • Private wireless networks in the US start going public
  • Microsoft patches 6 zero-day vulnerabilities under active attack

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

AT&T FirstNet unleashes robotic dogs for emergency services dlvr.it/ShW7p8

27th January 2023
UrgentComm

Federal agencies infested by cyberattackers via legit remote-management systems dlvr.it/ShVhn3

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient dlvr.it/ShVS1h

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

MCPTT interworking for critical communications dlvr.it/ShTm3P

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

Self-driving cars present terrorism risk, FBI director says dlvr.it/ShTTHx

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

UK Home Office officially will cut ESN ties with Motorola Solutions in December dlvr.it/ShNjfN

24th January 2023
UrgentComm

Newscan: Police software vendor breach exposes personal data, raid plans dlvr.it/ShN0q2

24th January 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: We're so excited about our awesome list of speakers! Today we highlight Budge Currier, a 9-1-1 Branch Manager at CAL OES, res…

24th January 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.