https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Call Center/Command


The big squeeze

The big squeeze

Video compression and other optimization technologies conserve bandwidth
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st March 2007

Although wireless video surveillance offers many benefits — such as the ability to monitor remote locations, quickly deploy cameras where needed or keep watch on an officer making a traffic stop — lack of bandwidth stands in the way of many implementations.

New spectrum available for public-safety broadband applications in the 4.9 GHz band, and in the 700 MHz band beginning in 2009, theoretically will make wireless video surveillance feasible. Still, that new spectrum is a finite resource, and video tends to use it up fast. Any agency considering wireless video surveillance should evaluate the techniques that different systems employ to optimize their use of the bandwidth.

One solution for transmitting video efficiently is to compress it, either by removing pixels from each image or removing frames from the sequence.

Nearly all surveillance video gets compressed to some extent, even the locally recorded video a merchant gives to police after a robbery, said Jonathan Hak, a crown prosecutor for the province of Alberta, Canada, and an expert on the legal aspects of forensic video in the U.S. and Canada. “If they’re getting a DVD from a store, the police agency needs to understand that it was already compressed by the store to begin with. And then it was compressed when it was put on the DVD.”

Euclid Discoveries announced a year ago that it has developed a video compression scheme that offers a 460% improvement over the MPEG-4 standard (MRT, March 2006), which would enable efficient wireless video transmission. For now, Euclid is targeting applications such as video conferencing and entertainment, but the technology could make it feasible to transmit surveillance videos over networks with limited bandwidth, the company said.

Public-safety agencies, however, should approach extreme compression schemes with caution. “High compression accommodates wireless transmission, but it severely reduces the quality of a recorded image if it is necessary as evidence,” said Mike Fergus, technical assistance coordinator for the Video Evidence Project of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP).

To get a judge to admit a piece of video as evidence, a prosecutor must demonstrate that it’s both accurate and reliable, Hak said. That’s a problem when compression produces a low-resolution image. Even if it’s admitted, the jury often isn’t convinced.

“Someone robs a bank and is seen outside, but he just consists of two or three pixels in the shape of a block,” Hak said. “We could certainly say there was one person that left the bank, but we could never tell you anything about that person.”

Even a good image might not pass muster. “You could have a crystal clear video, and the defense could present an expert who could cause the court to be concerned about the reliability of the video,” said Grant Fredericks, a forensic video analyst with Forensic Video Solutions and digital media adviser to the IACP. For example, compression schemes that delete some frames use information in the surrounding frames to interpolate motion, which can create strange artifacts, such as a head that briefly separates from a person’s body, he said.

There is no specific standard to dictate which videos are admissible as evidence; each judge decides on a case-by-case basis, Fredericks said.

Compression is far from the only optimization strategy for wireless video transmission.

Boundless Security Systems, which sells wireless surveillance systems, records three versions of the stream from each camera its customers place in the field. These include a high-resolution “investigations stream,” a medium-resolution “monitoring stream” and a low-resolution “situation assessment” stream. The company offers systems that operate on cellular, satellite or Wi-Fi networks.

The strategy is to use no more wireless capacity than is necessary at the moment. “There is zero network traffic unless someone requests it,” said Steve Morton, the company’s CEO

For instance, if a police officer with a mobile surveillance camera in his car wants to call upon a second pair of eyes during a traffic stop, a dispatcher can use the wireless link to monitor the situation in real time. Typically, he or she would view the low-resolution stream, which, according to Boundless Security, needs 250 kb/s to transmit video at 30 frames per second (f/s).

If the situation merits a closer look, the dispatcher can view the video in greater detail by choosing one of the higher-resolution streams. “It will take some extra seconds to move that higher-quality, and thus higher-data rate, recorded stream,” but that doesn’t pose a problem, Morton said, adding that the system pulls the stream from the recording in the video server. A detective could study a piece of video during an investigation by using the wireless network to access part of the recorded high-resolution stream. A prosecutor also can present that high-quality recording in court.

About a dozen companies are working on technology that would automatically make the kinds of decisions that humans make in the example above, said Bill Lawrence, CEO of Armida Technologies, which offers wireless video surveillance systems on Wi-Fi networks.

Called video analytics, this technology puts intelligence in the camera controller to determine when activity in front of the lens offers cause for concern. “It’s not just about something moving. It’s about something very specific moving in a particular direction or crossing a threshold — or leaving a bag unattended for a period of seconds — and letting the system determine if that’s important, or not important — and notify someone,” Lawrence said.

Another strategy for managing wireless video transmission is to increase the network’s usable bandwidth. Armida uses a proprietary technology called Videlity to better manage the efficiency of a video transmission across a wireless network.

An IP video transmission at 30 f/s requires 1.5 Mb/s of bandwidth, Lawrence said. The typical 802.11g Wi-Fi network promises 54 Mb/s but actual throughput is much less. “Some of the reason for the inefficiency is the way that Wi-Fi typically manages the amount of total bandwidth available,” he said.

Videlity’s focus is on ensuring that all the data packets in a video stream make it across the network. “All wireless networks drop data packets which, if not recovered, will result in bad video at the other side,” Lawrence said. Recovery techniques built into wireless networks tend to produce video that appears jerky or pixilated, he said.

Armida adds proprietary error correction, protocol enhancements and other technology to improve upon the network’s own techniques, without increasing the time it takes to deliver the video across the network, Lawrence said.

Firetide also focuses on managing the wireless data flow. It develops fixed mesh networks to which users can connect surveillance cameras. Firetide offers a raw data rate of 70 Mb/s. Although throughput in a mesh network degrades as the signal hops from node to node, Firetide’s new HotPort 6000 dual-radio mesh nodes can be configured to maintain throughput at 35 Mb/s.

Not all wireless video surveillance systems deliver video as the action unfolds. L-3 Communications Mobile-Vision sells an in-car video recording system for the public-safety market. When a vehicle returns to a police station where the agency has installed a wireless access point, the system automatically uploads the recorded video to a server.

In this kind transmission, which takes just a few minutes to upload an hour’s worth of video, there’s no pressure to trade image quality for speed. “You’re always transferring an entire file, so the fact that you’re wireless does not affect the quality of the video itself,” said Chris Kodach, chief scientist at L-3 Communications Mobile-Vision.

For L-3, then, efforts to manage the bandwidth focus on managing upload traffic in the parking lot. If the network can’t accommodate video from all the onboard systems trying to transmit at once, it sets priorities based on what it knows about each officer’s activities. Consequently, the first car into the parking lot doesn’t always upload first, Kodach said. “Maybe there’s another one that’s got a higher priority because it has to turn around and go quickly. Or maybe there’s a high-priority incident on there that has to come off first.”

Ultimately, public-safety agencies will want to let someone sitting at headquarters monitor the view through an in-car camera lens in real time, and that’s gong to require a lot more bandwidth, Kodach said. To manage this kind of transmission, he envisions a hybrid strategy that would transmit at perhaps 5 f/s for remote situation assessment, but capture images in the field at 30 f/s.

“You’re recording it at the higher rate, because that will ultimately … be your evidence,” Kodach said.

Multiple choice

All video streams are produced all the time for each camera (all parameters are programmable)

Investigations stream: Has sharpest images with highest resolution and fewest artifacts; 5 f/s (typical) and highest data rate (typically 0.5 Mb/s, maximum 2 Mb/s)

Monitoring stream: Has medium resolution, smoothest motion at high frame rate (10 f/s to 30 f/s) and medium data rate (typical 192 kb/s, maximum 750 kb/s at 30 f/s)

Situation assessment stream: Has lowest resolution and data rate (typical 32 kb/s, maximum 64 kb/s at 10 f/s, or 125 kb/s to 250 kb/s at 30 f/s)

Source: Boundless Security Systems

Tags: Call Center/Command content

Most Recent


  • AT&T claims LTE coverage edge, FirstNet build more than 99% done
    AT&T claims a 250,000-square-mile coverage advantage and that the planned five-year deployment of the FirstNet public-safety broadband network operating on the 700 MHz Band 14 spectrum licensed to the FirstNet Authority is more than 99% complete as a contractual deadline approaches this week. AT&T—the contractor responsible for building and maintaining the FirstNet public-safety broadband system—made […]
  • Verizon
    Verizon Frontline supports U.S. Forest Service efforts against wildfires
    Verizon Frontline increased its support of entities responding to wildland fires during 2022, particularly the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), which accounted for more than half of this activity by the carrier’s Crisis Response Team, according to the carrier. Cory Davis, Verizon’s assistant vice president for public safety, said that Verizon Frontline provided communications support to […]
  • Autonomous-vehicle consequences could include more traffic
    Most discussions about driverless, autonomous cars, have led to claims that they will help reduce congestion. Not so, says the RAC Foundation. It cites a UK government report which believes the opposite is true. Claiming that driverless cars could increase congestion by 85% by 2060. Presently, it’s thought that drivers lose more than 80 hours […]
  • Tesla Model 3 hacked in less than 2 minutes at Pwn2Own contest
    Researchers from France-based pen-testing firm Synacktiv demonstrated two separate exploits against the Tesla Model 3 this week at the Pwn2Own hacking contest in Vancouver. The attacks gave them deep access into subsystems controlling the vehicle’s safety and other components. One of the exploits involved executing what is known as a time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTTOU) attack on Tesla’s Gateway energy […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Microsoft patches 6 zero-day vulnerabilities under active attack
  • IoT connectivity spending climbs as COVID-19 cases decline
  • The battle over connected cars drags on
  • AI energizes remote monitoring of patients, fuels bidirectional health care

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Gallery: More presentations as IWCE enters second day dlvr.it/Sldj1c

29th March 2023
UrgentComm

Safer Buildings Coalition annual meeting held at IWCE 2023 dlvr.it/SldfdR

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

The Future of Interoperability for Dispatch Console Solutions dlvr.it/Slcp33

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: A look in at the Panel Session of Interconnected Critical Networks - Voice, Video and Data Interoperability... #IWCE23 http…

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: Wildfires are a growing concern, but technology can offer solutions. Fantastic panel moderated by @FirstNetGov this morning a…

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

IWCE speakers debate state of public-safety interoperability dlvr.it/SlcZ5L

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

UK competition watchdog delays Airwave-Motorola Solutions ruling until April dlvr.it/SlcNxN

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

Gallery: IWCE 2023 kicks off in Las Vegas dlvr.it/SlZlk4

28th March 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.