https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

System Design


The value of ferrite RF isolators

The value of ferrite RF isolators

Proper use at crowded communications sites can reduce intermodulation effects
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st March 2007

The class C final stage of a transmitter can be a hot breeding ground for intermodulation products. These intermodulation products travel back up the transmission line to the antenna and can wreak havoc on nearby receivers. This is caused by high-level signals entering the final stage through the antenna and transmission line.

Attenuating these high-level signals before they reach the mixing point (class C final stage) can greatly reduce the level of the intermodulation product(s) formed there. By attenuating the mixing components before they reach the mixing point, a great advantage or leverage is obtained.

Using ferrite radio frequency (RF) isolators between the transmitter and the antenna is good practice. Many times it is possible to manipulate the tuned frequency of the isolator in order to achieve better results in suppressing intermodulation products that are formed within the final class C stage of the transmitter. Figure 1 shows a typical arrangement using a ferrite RF isolator placed between the transmitter and the transmission line. This particular isolator is a single-section isolator.

Referring to Figure 1, the output of the transmitter is connected to the input port (left side) of the isolator. The output port (right side) is connected, through a second harmonic filter, to the transmission line. The load port (bottom) is connected to the dummy load. Fairly strong second harmonics can be generated within the ferrite isolator. Therefore, the second harmonic filter is used to suppress this second harmonic. It usually is unnecessary to use the special second harmonic filter when bandpass filters are employed at the transmitter output.

In the forward direction, the isolator is very broadband and causes very little attenuation to the transmitter output signal. For example, a typical single-section isolator of the type shown in Figure 1 might offer as little as 0.25 dB of insertion loss in the forward direction. This means that 94% to 95% of the power applied to the input of the isolator appears at the output. For example, 100 W at the input to the isolator produces 94 W to 95 W at the output.

Figure 2 on page 41 represents a printout from a spectrum analyzer that shows the response of the isolator in the reverse direction. That is, the swept signal is applied to the output port, and the response is taken from the input port. As shown, the center frequency is set to 160 MHz, and the sweep span is 40 MHz, or ±20 MHz. This sets the range from 140 MHz to 180 MHz. The marker is set to approximately 156 MHz (one division to the left of center). The amplitude or vertical scale is set to 10 dB per division. The low point of the notch (at 160 MHz) is approximately 40 dB down, indicating an isolation of 40 dB at 160 MHz.

Now, suppose that there is a transmitter operating nearby at a frequency of 156 MHz (frequency A) and another transmitter nearby operating at 157 MHz (frequency B). Further suppose that there is a receiver nearby operating on a frequency of 155 MHz (frequency C). The mathematical relationship between these frequencies can be expressed by the following equation:

2A – B = C

Plugging the numbers from our example into this equation yields the following result:

2 × 156 – 157 = 155 MHz

The reader will recognize this as a third-order intermod product. Let's assume that without the isolator in the line that this third-order intermod signal is at -20 dBm at the antenna. With the isolator in the line and with the response shown in Figure 2, the 156 MHz signal is attenuated by approximately 23 dB, and the 157 MHz signal would be attenuated by approximately 25 dB. The total attenuation to the intermod signal can be expressed by the following:

2 × 23 + 25 = 71 dB

Thus, the intermod signal at C is reduced to:

-20 – 71 = -91 dBm

It is vital to remember the leverage factor. The factor 2A found in the equation on page 40 represents leverage of 2 times the attenuation of signal A. And, since the coefficient of B is 1, we only get actual attenuation equal to signal B times 1. How can we use this leverage factor to achieve maximum attenuation of the intermod signal on frequency C? We retune the isolator to the frequency with the highest coefficient to get maximum leverage and thus maximum attenuation of the intermod signal.

Figure 3 shows the response of the isolator after it has been retuned for maximum isolation at 156 MHz. As seen from the response curve in Figure 3, the attenuation of signal A (156 MHz) is approximately 43 dB, and the attenuation of signal B (157 MHz) is approximately 33 dB. The total attenuation of the intermod signal at frequency C (155 MHz) is expressed by the following equation:

2 × 43 + 33 = 119 dB

Thus, the intermod signal at C is reduced to a level of:

-20 – 119 = -139 dBm

At a level of -139 dBm, the intermod signal is unlikely to cause any harm.

Another important test is to determine the impedance match at the input and output ports of the isolator. A return loss bridge is used for this test. First, the return loss bridge and the interconnections must be normalized. The normalization procedure is performed using the test setup in Figure 4. The test setup for checking the impedance match at the input port of the isolator is shown in Figure 5 on page 43, while the return loss at the input port is shown in the printout in Figure 6 on page 44. The return loss at 160 MHz is more than 50 dB. This indicates a VSWR of approximately 1.006:1, indicating an excellent match.

The same procedure is used to check the impedance match at the output port. The connections to the input and output ports are simply reversed from that shown in Figure 5. The printout for this procedure is depicted in Figure 7 on page 44. The return loss at the output port is greater than 45 dB at 160 MHz. This represents a VSWR of approximately 1.01:1 — again, an excellent match.

Now, let's look at a situation where the transmitter output is 100 W at 160 MHz, and the reflected power appearing at the output port of the isolator is 20 W. Referring to the printout in Figure 3 on page 42, the isolation at 160 MHz is about 22 dB. This means that the RF power coming into the isolator's output port (20 W) is attenuated by 22 dB as seen at the transmitter output. Thus, the reflected power appearing at the transmitter output is 20 W attenuated by 22 dB, or 0.13 W.

With a forward power of 100 W and reflected power of 0.13 W, the VSWR at the transmitter output is less than 1.1:1. If the forward power at the output port of the isolator is 95 W, and the reflected power is 20 W, then the VSWR at that point is around 2.7:1. Thus, the isolator is doing an excellent job of maintaining the proper impedance at the transmitter output.

Some important points to observe when using ferrite RF isolators are:

  • Observe the manufacturer's recommendation concerning the physical mounting of the isolator.

  • Make sure the isolator is properly tuned.

  • Use proper 50 ohm load at the load port (usually supplied by the manufacturer).

  • Check forward power at the input and output ports of the isolator.

  • Calculate the insertion loss from the forward power measurements.

  • Check insertion loss against the manufacturer's specifications.

  • Never place an isolator in the receive leg.

  • The dummy load at the load port should be able to handle at least 50% of the transmitter power.

  • Make sure that the isolator is not over-heating (this can lead to destruction).

  • Use a second harmonic filter when appropriate.

When properly used, isolators can significantly reduce interference problems at crowded communication sites.

Until next time — stay tuned!

Tags: Coverage/Interference System Design System Installation System Operation

Most Recent


  • The value of ferrite RF isolators
    Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny
    Web Roundup Items from other news organizations Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny Blinken postpones trip to Beijing after Chinese spy balloon spotted over U.S., officials say To protect satellites, secure your networks, chief of space ops says Ransomware offlines Arizona’s largest school district Mending the fabric: FCC says to file broadband-location challenges […]
  • The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless
    Verizon had high hopes for private wireless networking. The company had predicted that by now it would be well on its way to making billions of dollars from the sale of custom 4G and 5G networks dedicated exclusively to its enterprise customers. Indeed, during 2021 Verizon execs pegged the total addressable market for private wireless at around […]
  • Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them 'verified' Cloud Partner status
    Late last year, a group of threat actors managed to obtain “verified publisher” status through the Microsoft Cloud Partner Program (MCPP). This allowed them to surpass levels of brand impersonation ordinarily seen in phishing campaigns, as they distributed malicious applications bolstered by a verified blue badge only ever given to trusted vendors and service providers in […]
  • Shapeshifting robot can morph from a liquid to a solid
    A new shape-shifting robot can reversibly morph between liquid and solid shapes. The novel design was created by a team of engineers from The Chinese University of Hong Kong and Carnegie Mellon University. Inspired by sea cucumbers’ ability to go both soft or rigid depending on its environment, the miniature robot was built using magnetic […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • IoT connectivity spending climbs as COVID-19 cases decline
  • The battle over connected cars drags on
  • APCO, NENA, NASNA speakers cite ‘discussions’ to address NG911 funding issues
  • PSCR: Dereck Orr highlights features of June 21-24 virtual event

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny dlvr.it/Shvpw3

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless dlvr.it/Shth0P

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them ‘verified’ Cloud Partner status dlvr.it/Shqngn

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Shapeshifting robot can morph from a liquid to a solid dlvr.it/Shqk9K

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Automakers against stampede to BEV dominance dlvr.it/ShpX08

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

FCC nominee Gigi Sohn headed for third Senate hearing dlvr.it/ShpDcZ

1st February 2023
UrgentComm

Sign up to learn how to successfully manage your Motorola ASTRO® 25 System: spr.ly/60143j8fp https://t.co/XcxiUwzN27

1st February 2023
UrgentComm

Hytera parent cites financial health, but unable to make royalty payment to Motorola Solutions dlvr.it/ShlrlM

1st February 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.