https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Coverage/Interference


A losing proposition

A losing proposition

How RF attenuation on the transmission line affects the transmitter
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st December 2007

Imagine an RF transmission line without any RF attenuation. All the power from the transmitter would be delivered to the antenna. Conversely, all the signal from the antenna would be delivered, unattenuated, to the receiver input.

To understand the effects of transmission line attenuation on the transmitter signal, we will examine three basic examples: one with a theoretically lossless transmission line and a mismatched load, one with a lossy transmission line with a mismatched load and one with a lossy transmission line with a matched load. In this discussion it is assumed that a single point of reflection exists on the line, and that is at the load or antenna.

Let's look at the effect of RF attenuation on a transmission line that connects a radio transceiver to the antenna through a lossless line. A typical base station setup used with land mobile radios is shown in Figure 1. A transmitter is connected to an antenna through a length of transmission line, which is represented by A-C. Let's analyze this setup based on the traveling wave concept. Assume, for this discussion, that the antenna mismatch is such that the directional wattmeter, at position A, indicates 100 W in the forward direction and 20 W in the reverse direction. In a lossless transmission line, the power or voltage in the forward wave will be at the same level at any point on the transmission line. Similarly, the voltage or power in the reflected wave will be at the same level at any point on the transmission line.

Because the power (either forward or reflected) is the same at any point along the line, the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) also will be the same at any point along the line. In addition, the power delivered to the antenna will be equal to the difference between the measured forward power and the measured reflected power (100 W – 20 W = 80 W). This means that there is 20% reflected power. According to Table 1, this represents a VSWR of 2.62:1. Note that this VSWR will be the same at any point on the line because the line is lossless.

Now, let's assume that the transmission line in Figure 1 has an end-to-end loss, or RF attenuation, of 3 dB at the operating frequency. This changes things quite a bit. Let's examine the situation more closely. Assuming that we are using the same antenna, the percentage of power reflected from the antenna will be the same. However, the actual amount of RF power reflected will not be the same. This is because the line loss of 3 dB causes a 50% loss of power between the wattmeter and the antenna.

Again, suppose that the wattmeter indicates a forward power of 100 W at point A. A line loss of 3 dB means that only 50 W is reaching the antenna at point C. Using the same antenna means that 20% of this power will be reflected, so the reflected power is equal to 10 W. As a result, the power in the reflected wave at point C is 10 W. However, in traveling back down the line toward the transmitter, the line loss diminishes this reflected power to 5 W at point A. Moreover, the power at point A in the forward wave is 100 W, while the power in the reflected wave is 5 W. Thus, the percentage of reflected power has changed from 20% to 5%. Accordingly, the VSWR has changed from 2.62:1 to 1.58:1 between points C and A on the line. (See Table 1.) At point B, the VSWR would be less than at point C, but more than at point A.

The power radiated by the antenna is equal to the net power, or the difference between the forward and reflected power at the antenna. In this case, the radiated power is equal to 50 W – 10 W = 40 W. Yet the net power delivered to the line at point A is 100 W – 5 W = 95 W.

Let's assume that a new antenna is installed that properly matches the system impedance (50 ohms). Using the line with 3 dB loss, the forward power at the antenna is 50 W and the reflected power is 0 W. Thus, the VSWR at the antenna is 1:1. This means that all the forward power (50 W) is radiated. Thus, the amount of power wasted in the line is 50 W because the forward power at point A is 100 W. In each example, we will compare the net power radiated by the antenna to the net power at point A to determine the actual line loss in decibels.

In the first example, there was no line loss, so the transmitted power is simply equal to the difference between the forward power and the reflected power at point A. In the second example, the forward power at the antenna (point C) was 50 W and the reflected power was 10 W; accordingly, the net power is 40 W. At the input side of the line at point A, the difference between the forward and reflected power results in net power of 95 W. By comparing the net input power with the net output power we can determine the net line loss. In this example, the net line loss in decibels is shown in Equation 1.

In the third example the antenna was matched to the 50-ohm system impedance, so there is no reflected power and the radiated power is 50 W. Thus, the line loss is 3 dB. Compare this with the line loss in the second example, where there was a mismatch at the antenna. The additional loss caused by such a mismatch is equal to 0.76 dB (3.76 dB – 3 dB). This extra line loss (above the normal matched line loss) increases with normal transmission line loss; it also increases with higher VSWR at the antenna. Remember, in the first example there was a mismatch at the antenna but no line loss, and the net input power at point A was equal to the net output power at point C, the antenna. In the second example, the VSWR at the antenna was 2.62:1 while the directional wattmeter readings indicated that the VSWR at the input side of the line was only 1.58:1.

It is important to note that the line loss actually masked the VSWR that existed at the antenna. This is quite misleading; the line loss must be taken into consideration when trying to determine the VSWR at the input side of the transmission line. This discussion assumes that the reflection is a single-point reflection occurring at the antenna (point C).

The VSWR can be calculated from the forward and reflected power. In the first example the forward power at point A on the line was 100 W and the reflected power was 20 W. From this, assuming a 50-ohm line, we can calculate the voltage in the forward and reflected waves. The calculation is shown in Equation 2. In this equation, Ef represents voltage in the forward wave, P represents power in the forward wave and Z represents the system impedance. The voltage in the reflected wave is calculated as shown in Equation 3, where Er represents voltage in the reflected wave.

Now that we know the voltages in the forward and reflected waves, we can calculate the VSWR as shown in Equation 4. In most cases, the RF attenuation of the transmission line is undesirable and causes a waste of RF power. In planning a base station and the desired coverage area, software usually is used to determine the antenna height and power required to provide adequate coverage of the desired area. Suppose the system required a minimum of 300 W of effective radiated power (ERP) at a given location and antenna height. Further suppose that the transmitter power is limited to 100 W and the antenna gain is 6 dBd. If the line loss were 0 dB, then the ERP would be 400 W. The loss of the required transmission line should not exceed 1.25 dB. (See Equation 5.)

From this, it is obvious that a transmission line with a loss no greater than 1.25 dB at the operating frequency must be used. Consult manufacturers' catalogs to find the cable that offers RF attenuation (at the required length) of no more than 1.25 dB. Attenuation values are usually specified in terms of dB/100 feet. If the required cable length is 200 feet, the attenuation should be no more than 1.25 dB/2, or 0.625 dB/100 feet.

Many amateur radio operators and experimenters choose to use an open-wire feeder, sometimes called a ladder line or window line. (Technically speaking, however, ladder lines and window lines are not the same.) These are very low-loss transmission lines that can handle high VSWR without causing any significant additional line loss. Typically, these types of transmission lines are not suitable for use in commercial land mobile radio applications.

It should be noted that a high VSWR seen at the transmitter output could trigger the protective foldback circuit, which causes a reduction of transmitter output power. This protective circuit prevents blowing RF output transistors. The power reduction caused by the triggering of this protective circuitry is as significant as the additional line loss caused by a high VSWR.

This discussion has centered around the effects of line loss on the transmitted signal. In a future issue we will look at the effects of line loss on the received signal.

Until next time, stay tuned!

Table 1
Reflected power (%) Voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR)
5 1.58
10 1.92
15 2.26
20 2.62
35 3.00
30 3.42
35 3.90
40 4.44
45 5.08
50 5.83

Equation 1

L = 10log (40/95) = 3.76 dB

Equation 2

Ef = √PZ = √100 × 50 = √5000 =70.7 V

Equation 3

Er = √PZ = √20 × 50 = √1000 =31.6 V

Equation 4

VSWR= Ef + Er/Ef – Er 70.7 + 31.6/70.7 – 31.6 = 102.3/39.1 = 2.62:1

Equation 5

L = 10log P1/P2 = 10log 300/400 = 10log (0.75) = 1.25 dB

Tags: Coverage/Interference System Design

Most Recent


  • AT&T wireless growth keyed by FirstNet—now provides 24,000 agencies with 4.4 million connections
    AT&T this week reported that FirstNet ended 2022 supporting more than 24,000 public-safety agencies with “about” 4.4 million connections, including 377,000 connections that were added during the last three months of 2022—a total that represents more than half of the carrier’s post-paid wireless growth for the quarter. AT&T officials released these figures in conjunction with […]
  • Report: Remote work causing offices to empty, but walkable cities still in high demand
    Given the reliance on vehicular transportation in the United States, some American cities historically haven’t prioritized being walkable in past planning and or design. But amid an unprecedented shift in the economy toward remote work, those that have are increasingly desirable for prospective residents. A new report from Smart Growth American and Places Platform, “Foot Traffic Ahead […]
  • AT&T FirstNet unleashes robotic dogs for emergency services
    AT&T is releasing robotic hounds from Ghost Robotics as part of the service provider’s FirstNet emergency responder service. In a blog, AT&T VP Lance Spencer explained that the robotic dogs will be connected to AT&T’s network and deployed for public safety, defense, federal and state agencies, local police and fire departments, and commercial customers. “Network-connected robotic dogs can deliver a […]
  • Federal agencies infested by cyberattackers via legit remote-management systems
    It has come to light that hackers cleverly utilized two off-the-shelf remote monitoring and management systems (RMMs) to breach multiple Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agency networks in the US last summer. On Jan. 25, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), National Security Agency (NSA), and Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) released […]

One comment

  1. Avatar Amber McKinnon 17th July 2017 @ 11:04 pm
    Reply

    Typo in your table
    Typo in your table above.
    fifth row should be 25 not 35.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Private wireless networks in the US start going public
  • IoT connectivity spending climbs as COVID-19 cases decline
  • The battle over connected cars drags on
  • UK officials revamp ESN plans again, target Airwave-to-LTE transition for end of 2026

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

AT&T wireless growth keyed by FirstNet—now provides 24,000 agencies with 4.4 million connections dlvr.it/ShY5qH

27th January 2023
UrgentComm

Report: Remote work causing offices to empty, but walkable cities still in high demand dlvr.it/ShXM7Z

27th January 2023
UrgentComm

AT&T FirstNet unleashes robotic dogs for emergency services dlvr.it/ShW7p8

27th January 2023
UrgentComm

Federal agencies infested by cyberattackers via legit remote-management systems dlvr.it/ShVhn3

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient dlvr.it/ShVS1h

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

MCPTT interworking for critical communications dlvr.it/ShTm3P

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

Self-driving cars present terrorism risk, FBI director says dlvr.it/ShTTHx

26th January 2023
UrgentComm

UK Home Office officially will cut ESN ties with Motorola Solutions in December dlvr.it/ShNjfN

24th January 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.