https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Test & Measurement


Don’t be fooled

Don’t be fooled

The masking effect of cable loss may cause your antenna to appear to perform more efficiently than is actually the case. In fact, it is possible to measure
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st August 2008

The masking effect of cable loss may cause your antenna to appear to perform more efficiently than is actually the case. In fact, it is possible to measure apparently acceptable voltage standing wave ratios (VSWR) or return loss (RL) levels even though your antenna may be completely out of operation. The purpose of this article is to provide an understanding of the cable-loss masking effect and explain how to avoid this pitfall.

Figure 1 and Examples 1 and 2 illustrate the masking effects of cable loss. As you can see, 3 dB of cable loss will produce measurements with a significant error offset. Given that a typical antenna is designed to operate at 1.5 VSWR (-14.0 dB return loss) or better, this could make the difference between judging your antenna as in or out of specification. Furthermore, 7 dB of cable loss could render the measurement meaningless. This worst-case scenario may allow an antenna failure to go undetected.

The masking effect of cable loss causes an error offset when measuring antenna VSWR or return loss match levels. This error offset may be corrected using Equation 1.

VSWR match levels may be corrected by converting to/from equivalent return loss match levels. A match-offset feature on your test equipment will automate this calculation. Simply enter the cable loss value as the match offset and the corrected VSWR or return loss match level will display.

Cable loss is the total insertion loss of your transmission cable system. This typically will include insertion loss of the transmission cable, jumper cables, connectors and lightning protection. Note that loss of other components (e.g., VSWR/power monitor, duplexer, combiner or filter) also may come into play.

As an example, the transmission cable system for an 800 MHz antenna mounted at the 200-foot (61-meter) level of a tower may include the following:

  • Transmission cable: ⅞-inch Andrew LDF5-50A, 1.13 dB/100 feet (3.69 dB/100 meters) at 824 MHz
  • Jumper cable: ½-inch Andrew FSJ4-50B, 3.23 dB/100 feet (10.6 dB/100 meters) at 824 MHz

Based on those cable specifications, the losses would be calculated at:

  • 230 feet of transmission cable = 2.60 dB loss
  • 20 feet jumper cable at transmitter = 0.65 dB loss
  • 10 feet jumper cable at antenna = 0.32 dB loss
  • Connection pairs × 4 = 0.1 × 4 = 0.4 dB loss
  • Lightning protection = 0.1 dB loss

As a result, the cable loss (total insertion loss) would be 4.07 dB. In this case, a 1.17 VSWR (-22.1 dB RL) measured at the transmitter end of the cable would indicate that the antenna measurement is actually 1.50 VSWR (-14.0 dB RL). This would be acceptable as a typical antenna is designed to operate at 1.50 VSWR (-14.0 dB RL) or better.

Similarly, a 1.50 VSWR (-14.0 dB RL) measured at the transmitter would equate to a 3.09 VSWR (-5.8 dB RL) at the antenna. This would signify that the antenna is not performing to the 1.50 VSWR (-14.0 dB RL) specification.

Finally, a 2.29 VSWR (-8.1 dB RL) at the transmitter yields an antenna with a 100+ VSWR (0.0 dB RL). This measurement should alert the user that the antenna has failed and requires immediate attention.

Cable loss can be measured with the same equipment used to measure your antenna VSWR or return loss levels. A vector network analyzer (VNA) with a cable loss mode simplifies this measurement. Simply connect one end of your cable to the VNA, place an open or short at the far end of the cable, and perform the cable-loss test.

A VNA with a distance-to-fault (DTF) or fault location mode will automatically correct for cable loss. The cable loss per meter or per foot is entered during the setup of the DTF measurement. Once setup is complete, connect one end of your cable to the VNA with the antenna connected at the far end of the cable and perform the DTF test. The result is an antenna-VSWR or return-loss measurement corrected for cable loss.

A power meter also may be used to calculate cable loss. Measure the power levels at the input and output of your cable, convert to units of dBm, and calculate the difference. For example, input power of 100 W (50 dBm) and output of 50 W (47 dBm) yields a cable loss of 3 dB (50 dBm – 47 dBm). Cable loss also may be estimated, as noted earlier. Sum the insertion loss parameters for each component of your transmission cable system at your operating frequency. Note that insertion loss increases as frequency increases.

Cable loss causes a masking effect when measuring antenna-VSWR and return-loss levels. Cable loss can be measured with the same vector network analyzer or power meter used for your antenna measurements. A match-offset feature on your test equipment will correct VSWR and return loss match levels. Correcting for this error offset is essential to determine your antenna’s actual performance level.

Jim Norton is an applications engineer at Bird Electronic Corp. He has 20 years of experience in the land mobile radio and cellular telephone industries, serving in both applications and systems engineering roles.

Where RL represents return loss and CL represents cable loss.

Cable loss: 3 dB

EQUATION 1

RL at antenna = RL at transmitter – (2 × CL)

VSWR measured at transmitter: 1.5 VSWR (-14 dB return loss)

EXAMPLE 1
CABLE LOSS OF 3dB

Antenna VSWR (actual): 2.33 VSWR (-8 dB return loss)

VSWR measurement error 0.83 VSWR (6 dB return loss)

Forward power measured at transmitter: 100 W

Forward power at the antenna (actual): 50.1 W

Forward power measurement error: 99.6% W

Reflected power measured at transmitter: 4 W

Reflected power at antenna (actual): 8 W

Reflected power measurement error: -50% W

Cable loss: 7 dB

VSWR measured at transmitter: 1.5 VSWR (-14 dB return loss)

EXAMPLE 2
CABLE LOSS OF 7dB

Antenna VSWR (actual): 100+ VSWR (0 dB return loss)

VSWR measurement error: 98.5+ VSWR (14 dB return loss)

Forward power measured at transmitter: 100 W

Forward power at the antenna (actual): 20 W

Forward power measurement error: 400% W

Reflected power measured at transmitter: 4 W

Reflected power at antenna (actual):20 W

Reflected power measurement error: -80% W

Cable loss has a masking effect on antenna VSWR and return loss measurements. The end result is an error offset that must be corrected. The following exercise walks you through this process with a step-by-step procedure.

A 100 W transmitter is connected to a cable and antenna. Cable insertion loss is known to be 3 dB. Measurements taken at the transmitter end of the cable indicate a VSWR of 1.5 (–14 dB return loss). What is the actual antenna VSWR or return loss?

STEP-BY-STEP PROCEDURE

Step 1: Forward power at antenna

1a) List known values.
Forward power at transmitter = 100 W
Cable loss = 3 dB

1b) Calculate forward power.
Forward power at transmitter
= 100 W
Convert W to dBm
= 10 x Log 100 W + 30
= 50 dBm

Forward power at antenna
= Forward power at transmitter – cable loss
= 50 dBm – 3 dBm
= 47.0 dBm
Convert dBm to W
= 10 (47.0 dBm – 30) / 10
= 50.1 W

Step 2: Reflected power at antenna

2a) List known values.
Measurement at transmitter
= 1.5 VSWR
= –14 dB return loss

Forward power at transmitter
= 100 W
= 50 dBm

Cable loss = 3.0 dB

2b) Calculate reflected power.
Reflected power at transmitter
= Forward power x 10 (Return loss / 10)
= 100 W x 10 (–14 dB / 10) = 4 W
Convert W to dBm
= 10 x Log 4 W + 30
= 36.0 dBm

Reflected power at antenna
= Reflected power at transmitter + cable loss
= 36 dBm + 3 dB
= 39 dBm
Convert dBm to W
= 10 (39 dBm – 30) / 10
= 8 W

Step 3: VSWR and RL at antenna

3a) List known values.
Forward power at antenna
= 50.1 W
= 47 dBm

Reflected power at antenna
= 8 W
= 39 dBm

3b) Calculate VSWR and RL at antenna.
Rho at antenna
= √ (reflected / forward power)
= √ (8 W / 50.1 W)
= 0.4

VSWR at antenna
= (1 + Rho) / (1 – Rho)
= (1 + 0.4) / (1 – 0.4)
= 2.33

Return loss at antenna
= 10 Log (reflected / forward power)
= 10 Log (8 W / 50.1 W)
= –8.0 dB

A few trends are worthy of note:
As cable loss increases, the error offsets increase as well. As VSWR or return loss levels increase, the error offsets also increase. Error offsets are independent of power levels. As an example, 3 mW, 50 W and 1 kW applications are equally affected by the masking effect of cable loss.

Tags: content Test & Measurement

Most Recent


  • Don’t be fooled
    Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny
    Web Roundup Items from other news organizations Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny Blinken postpones trip to Beijing after Chinese spy balloon spotted over U.S., officials say To protect satellites, secure your networks, chief of space ops says Ransomware offlines Arizona’s largest school district Mending the fabric: FCC says to file broadband-location challenges […]
  • FAA approves beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) flights in North Dakota
    The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) avionics company uAvionix received Federal Aviation Administration approval to conduct advanced beyond visual line-of-sight (BVLOS) flights of small UAVs in North Dakota.  The flights will be conducted at the Northern Plains Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Test Site (NPUASTS) in Grand Forks, one of seven FAA-run UAV test sites in the U.S., using […]
  • Spending American Rescue Plan Act funds: A primer for municipalities
    The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 is a $1.9 trillion legislative package that includes funding for states, local governments and tribal nations to respond to the economic and public health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. While initially restricted, subsequent guidance from the federal government has expanded what those funds can be used for. […]
  • Report: Remote work causing offices to empty, but walkable cities still in high demand
    Given the reliance on vehicular transportation in the United States, some American cities historically haven’t prioritized being walkable in past planning and or design. But amid an unprecedented shift in the economy toward remote work, those that have are increasingly desirable for prospective residents. A new report from Smart Growth American and Places Platform, “Foot Traffic Ahead […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • New Orleans-area 911 center inks multiyear APEX deal with Carbyne to replace call-handling system
  • Cyber is the new Cold War, and AI is the arms race
  • Microsoft patches 6 zero-day vulnerabilities under active attack
  • AI energizes remote monitoring of patients, fuels bidirectional health care

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Public-safety coalition renews efforts to secure federal NG911 funding dlvr.it/ShwGfn

4th February 2023
UrgentComm

Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny dlvr.it/Shvpw3

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless dlvr.it/Shth0P

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them ‘verified’ Cloud Partner status dlvr.it/Shqngn

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Shapeshifting robot can morph from a liquid to a solid dlvr.it/Shqk9K

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Automakers against stampede to BEV dominance dlvr.it/ShpX08

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

FCC nominee Gigi Sohn headed for third Senate hearing dlvr.it/ShpDcZ

1st February 2023
UrgentComm

Sign up to learn how to successfully manage your Motorola ASTRO® 25 System: spr.ly/60143j8fp https://t.co/XcxiUwzN27

1st February 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.