https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Commentary Newsletters


PSST role needs to be settled quickly

PSST role needs to be settled quickly

By FCC standards, the commission’s pace for acting on the public-private partnership proposal to build a shared wireless broadband network for public safety in the 700 MHz band has been lightning-quick compare to its usual glacial-like work rate
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 18th December 2008

By FCC standards, the commission’s pace for acting on the public-private partnership proposal to build a shared wireless broadband network for public safety in the 700 MHz band has been lightning-quick compare to its usual glacial-like work rate.

Last year, in less than eight months, the commission took a proposal advocated by Cyren Call Communications and transformed it from a dead legislative idea into the cornerstone for auction rules governing the 10 MHz of commercial D Block spectrum.

Of course, this part of the auction failed to attract a bidder, and the FCC again embarked on an aggressive schedule to adopt new D Block rules and reauction the airwaves—adopt draft rules in late September, receive comments on the proposal into November and release rules by the end of the year. Logistically challenging, political realities seem to have made the schedule impossible to meet, as outgoing FCC Chairman Kevin Martin recently acknowledged.

As a result, the fate of the D Block apparently will be decided by a new FCC, and that likely means the matter will be delayed for some time, as justifiable delays are a natural symptom of a transition period that sees the commission reconstituted and employees in the agency shuffled to new posts. It’s hard to imagine that the FCC will be in position to tackle issues as complex as the D Block until May or June.

In general, a delay could prove to be positive. To date, the D Block has been considered in a rushed manner, so having some time to consider the various options out there could be helpful—this year, we should learn a lot more about the realities of 4G deployments, technically and economically. Certainly it appears that both the commercial and public-safety industries need time to develop an internal consensus, much less points of agreement between the two sides.

Delay could allow other parts of the government to possibly lend a hand. Congress certainly didn’t seem to like the FCC’s approach to handling the D Block, maybe its membership would like to offer its own ideas—or pass a law that would enable the request-for-proposal concept advocated by Verizon and AT&T to become a reality. Meanwhile, a wireless broadband network for public safety would seem like something that would fit nicely into the new administration’s $44 billion broadband infrastructure program.

The possibilities are endless, and the government should take its time to get the D Block strategy “right.”

But two areas that need to be addressed in the short term are 700 MHz narrowband relocation and the role of the Public Safety Spectrum Trust (PSST), the licensee for public safety’s broadband spectrum in the band.

While there have been many arguments about the proper use of the spectrum, no one seems to question the FCC’s decision last year to change the band plan at 700 MHz. As we have stated in this space before, none of the broadband strategies will work until the narrowband systems are operating on their new frequencies, so getting the money to fund the relocation (government officials seem to avoid the word “rebanding,” even though that’s what we’re talking about) needs to be a priority. Congress, are you listening?

As for the PSST, the feds need to determine whether a nationwide licensee representing public safety is needed, and whether the PSST is the organization best suited for that role. If not, the license should be taken from the PSST quickly, to minimize confusion and wasted time, money and effort.

If the PSST is deemed appropriate to represent public safety, Congress needs to provide a viable funding mechanism that will allow the PSST—or another entity, if that’s the choice—to be an independent, competent representative of public safety.

For more than a year, I’ve heard critics of the PSST—inside and outside public safety—complain about the organization’s lack of outreach and its acceptance of millions of dollars in loans from its advisor, Cyren Call.

There certainly is legitimacy in these complaints, but the fact is that the PSST has not had many options. Outreach costs money, and the PSST doesn’t have any way to generate revenue to pay expenses—the organization’s only asset is an FCC license it cannot use on its own. At a time when a multibillion-dollar industry giant like Motorola has seen its credit rating downgraded to “junk,” it’s not surprising that investors aren’t exactly lining up to lend money to an entity with no collateral and an uncertain future.

With this in mind, the PSST arguably is lucky to secure the seven-figure loans it has received to date from Cyren Call, which has accepted a real risk that it may never be repaid. The amount of money is not enough for the PSST do conduct all the outreach and research it should as the representative. Public-safety entities have a lot of assets—most notably, tower sites and backhaul—that a commercial partner would like to leverage, but such possibilities need to be identified and inventoried prior to negotiations with a commercial partner.

Meanwhile, under the structure of the current proposal, the public-safety representative needs to be financially solid when negotiating with a commercial partner, which almost certainly will have team of well-paid negotiators on its side. What public safety does not need is to be represented by cash-strapped organization advised by an entity that is perceived as desperate to make a deal, because failure to do so mean that both its multimillion-dollar loans and its hope for an ongoing contract are lost.

Unfortunately, without changes, that’s exactly the negotiating scenario the PSST faces in approximately a year, if the D Block is reauctioned and a winning bidder emerges.

Every elected official talks about the importance of public security and their commitment to ensure that the populace is safe. No one has questioned the need for an interoperable broadband network. If the federal government is willing to pay for such a network, the least it should ensure that the public-safety representative in a public-private venture is financially sound enough to be in position to say, “No,” if a deal that is not in the interest of public safety is put on the table.

In short, if the PSST is to be public safety’s representative in this important endeavor, the government needs to make sure that it is well funded. That’s the least that public safety deserves.

What do you think? Comment in the box below.

Tags: Commentary Newsletters Policy & Law Commentary

Most Recent


  • LTE and liability: Why the fire service must move forward with digital incident command
    The grief following a firefighter line-of-duty death (LODD) is beyond words. Fellow firefighters are devastated. Families are shattered. In the aftermath, questions arise about the circumstances: Was the loss preventable? What was the chain of actions leading to the catastrophe? Central to these questions is the role of incident command (IC), the command’s situational awareness, […]
  • Partnership and collaboration must be the foundation for emergency communications
    I’m from a little town in West Texas. As a Texan, I like getting straight to the point: I believe that emergency communications are a matter of national security. Because this message is so important, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has designated this April as the first-ever Emergency Communications Month. At CISA, we […]
  • FirstNet success means no hypothetical 'shots' need to be fired, Swenson says
    As public-safety officials today commemorate the 10-year anniversary of the FirstNet Authority being created, the deployment of the FirstNet nationwide public-safety broadband network (NPSBN) has proceeded well enough that no one needs to face a firing squad, according to former Authority board Chair Sue Swenson. “Save it for another time,” Swenson said during a recent […]
  • Show support for law enforcement on National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day
    This coming Sunday, January 9th, is National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day—a well-deserved day to thank and show support to law-enforcement officers for their dedication to duty and service to their local communities, as well as protecting the people who live and work in the communities. On behalf of L3Harris, a Florida-based company that provides critical […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiator
  • Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces
  • Bridging digital divide by fostering digital inclusion and economic recovery
  • Public safety needs a better way to triage emergency calls

Commentary


LTE and liability: Why the fire service must move forward with digital incident command

  • 2
6th May 2022

Partnership and collaboration must be the foundation for emergency communications

18th April 2022

FirstNet success means no hypothetical ‘shots’ need to be fired, Swenson says

22nd February 2022
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Sesame Solar leverages mobile solar, hydrogen to power efforts beyond the grid dlvr.it/ST8m3K

1st July 2022
UrgentComm

Newscan: On front lines, communications breakdowns prove costly for Ukraine dlvr.it/ST7fnC

30th June 2022
UrgentComm

China-backed APT pwns building-automation systems with ProxyLogon dlvr.it/ST6q7m

30th June 2022
UrgentComm

Samsung fills its 2G hole in new challenge to Ericsson and Nokia dlvr.it/ST6hBK

30th June 2022
UrgentComm

Militarized drone swarms coming dlvr.it/ST6dNz

30th June 2022
UrgentComm

Take American City & County’s budgeting survey dlvr.it/ST6Yxb

30th June 2022
UrgentComm

Final cases made about Airwave, ESN, before CMA issues provisional decision on Motorola Solutions dlvr.it/ST4Q6X

29th June 2022
UrgentComm

Polaris Wireless: Manlio Allegra talks 911 Z-axis tech, future IoT opportunities dlvr.it/ST1384

28th June 2022

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X