https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Networks & Systems Commentary


As 700 MHz plans heat up, don’t forget the costs involved

As 700 MHz plans heat up, don’t forget the costs involved

While lots of pieces are coming together to make broadband deployments in the 700 MHz band a reality sooner rather than later (you can get a recap of what has happened here), I can't help but wonder how expensive a proposition this would be — and how realistic an aggressive timetable would be — for many public-safety agencies.
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 24th June 2009

It’s no secret that many of the country’s major metropolitan areas are chomping at the bit to deploy mobile broadband networks in the 700 MHz band. Already, eight public-safety groups have said they want Congress to allocate the 10 MHz of commercial D Block spectrum in the 700 MHz band for public-safety use. Current D-Block rules call for a commercial operator to bid for the spectrum and build a nationwide network on behalf of public safety, but now it’s clear the first-responder community wants to get its own hands on this spectrum.

While lots of pieces are coming together to make broadband deployments in the 700 MHz band a reality sooner rather than later (you can get a recap of what has happened here), I can’t help but wonder how expensive a proposition this would be — and how realistic an aggressive timetable would be — for many public-safety agencies. Remember that the primary reason a public/private partnership was conceived in the first place was to defray the high costs and complexity of this network. Any public-safety agency would really have to think outside the box when it comes to leveraging equipment and rollout costs should it decide to move forward without a commercial partner.

It’s looking like Long Term Evolution (LTE) technology will be the winner in the public-safety 700 MHz band as the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO), the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) and the National Public-Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) endorsed the technology earlier this month. It makes sense given the fact that the country’s two largest operators — Verizon and AT&T — have chosen LTE as the technology for their 4G networks, which also will operate in the 700 MHz band. Also, AT&T has expressed interest in asking its vendors to include public-safety bands in future LTE devices. This bodes well for public safety should it ultimately opt to work with a commercial operator—or several.

That’s something the public-safety sector should consider seriously. LTE is a brand new technology with no economies of scale to date, which should give even large agencies thinking about going it alone some pause, particularly because they would have considerably less buying power than even a regional operator, much less a behemoth like Verizon or AT&T. In addition, the wireless operators haven’t provided much guidance concerning their anticipated LTE capex. Consequently, any public-safety entity contemplating its own buildout should proceed with extreme caution.

Agencies also should consider that the U.S. market will be one of the most aggressive LTE markets in the world. In addition to Verizon and AT&T, regional players like MetroPCS and US Cellular plan early rollouts of LTE in 2010. Rural operator CenturyTel has indicated plans to use LTE to bridge the digital divide in areas that are difficult and expensive to reach with wired services. All of these operators have plans to recoup their investments by selling commercial service. The public-safety community will not.

That’s why it will be critical for any municipalities considering a solo 700 MHz play to look at these networks as multi-use networks by getting a buy-in from other government agencies besides the public-safety community. I have pointed to New York City in the past as a model, and I will point to it again. The city has deployed a TD-CDMA network that is upgradable to LTE in the 2.5 GHz band (it now is asking for 700 MHz spectrum so it can offer better in-building coverage). The deployment was an expensive undertaking at $500 million, but agencies across the city are saving money because it has evolved into a network that supports more than 19 municipal departments and more than 50 discrete applications, which range from mobile access to fingerprint records for law enforcement to remote meter reading for the water department. Most important, public safety has priority access on the network.

Moreover, NYC’s mobile broadband network is an example of what Verizon Wireless and AT&T Mobility are proposing. They are calling for regional or local licensees in the public-safety sector to solicit commercial operators via a bid process to construct networks — built to a national standard to enable interoperability — that likely would try to leverage existing infrastructure, which would save enormous time and money.

There is no doubt that mobile broadband is a game-changer in terms of technical capabilities. It is critical. I just hope that many agencies don’t feel they are stymied by cost, which is the same problem facing many agencies in the Project 25 world. While grants will be coming down the pike, the public-safety community has learned through the P25 experience that such handouts aren’t a panacea for handling the costs involved with constructing and maintaining a network.

Agencies already have learned a lot from P25 — most notably that partnering with other jurisdictions creates interoperability and cuts down on costs. But if the public-safety community wants to be first-movers in a brand new technology that commercial operators themselves will be cutting their teeth on, they definitely need to find ways to justify to their constituents why hefty investments are necessary now in mobile broadband but could end up saving taxpayer money later.

Tags: Networks & Systems Commentary

Most Recent


  • Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis
    Every time I read about a public safety agency being short staffed, with a burnt-out workforce, draining their overtime budget, I feel their pain. From New York to New Mexico and in communities all across the nation, police and fire departments routinely are forced to mandate longer shifts, which takes an emotional toll and raises […]
  • NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation
    As the new Congress begins its work in earnest, we look forward to continued progress in funding the transition to IP-based next-generation 911 (NG911) technology. Our nation’s 911 systems are critical to ensuring the safety and security of our communities, and nationwide implementation of NG911 will ensure these systems can leverage the most advanced communications […]
  • Do smart cities make safer cities?
    According to the United Nations, two out of three people will live in urban areas by 2050. This increase in city populations will undoubtedly put an even greater strain on government service providers.  Faced with the growing demand of residents for increasingly agile and efficient public services, cities must be able to adapt quickly and […]
  • Reflections on recent LTE outages
    Rogers Communications Canada experienced a national service outage on July 8, 2022, that halted LTE communications for millions of Canadians, including public-safety agencies counting on mobile broadband for operations. In light of this jarring failure, should public-safety leaders rethink plans to collapse all wireless communications onto a single wireless technology platform operated by a service […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiator
  • Ransomware? Let's call it what it really is: extortionware
  • Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces
  • Hi-tech sewer can help safeguard public health, environment and economies

Commentary


Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023

Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.