https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Wireless Networks


In-Building Blocks

In-Building Blocks

Municipalities finally have the tools to push in-building public-safety communications throughout the country, but cost and complexity threaten to slow the process.
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st October 2009

The importance of first responders being able to communicate deep within a building during an emergency was highlighted when terrorists attacked the World Trade Center eight years ago. Firefighters lost communication with each other in the high-rise buildings. The problem is all too common across the nation, prompting local governments to pass ordinances or other laws that require building owners to ensure access to public-safety wireless networks inside their buildings.

The detailed ordinances needed to accommodate in-building public-safety communications are expected to proliferate now that international and domestic fire codes, the latter created by the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA), were finalized this year. The codes offer a framework for individual governments to follow when drafting their own in-building codes.

“A national code cuts the task down considerably for local governments,” said in-building communications expert Jack Daniel. “It’s a painful process to have to develop the code and all of the technical requirements yourself. When it’s national, that part is handed to you.”

Rick Swiers, vice president of business development with in-building integrator TriPower, estimates that some 150 local governments are enforcing some type of in-building public-safety ordinance for buildings of larger sizes and occupancies. But that doesn’t mean building owners are required to deploy in-building systems. Rather, they must demonstrate to have a certain amount of coverage of public-safety signals, which can be accomplished by penetrating the building from outside, said Matt Melester, an in-building communications expert and group president of the wireless innovations group with Andrew Solutions.

Nevertheless, the wave is coming, Melester said. “We’ve seen the front-end of the wave, but we expect it to increase in the next two to three years.”

MAJOR MODIFICATIONS

Las Vegas is a particular hotbed, as casinos and their windowless worlds essentially keep wireless signals from penetrating their walls. Orange County, Calif., and in particular the city of Irvine, has been one of the more aggressive regions of the country when it comes to in-building communications mandates in light of a building boom, Daniel said.

“Most ordinances refer to new buildings and anything that is a major modification of that structure — basically anything that would cause a building owner to go back and apply for a building permit would be a trigger for compliance,” Daniel said. “In most cases, existing structures don’t have to, unless the fire marshal demands it.”

Swiers believes hospitals and hotels in many areas of the country will be the first targets of these stricter coverage requirements because of their high density of occupants.

But the proliferation of in-building public-safety communications systems may very well move as slowly as in-building sprinklers, which took about 20 years as building owners balked at the cost, Melester said.

“The real challenge is how to fund these systems,” Melester said. “I liken it a lot to when they required sprinklers in buildings. First it was in all new buildings and then it was required for existing structures, and no one wanted to spend that money at the beginning. But everyone wants one when there is a fire. Public-safety communications will be the same way. It’s an additional expense, an insurance policy that you feel like you are spending money for nothing until an event happens when you need it.”

Indeed, Daniel said many building owners are experiencing sticker shock when they find out the price tag of a distributed antenna system (DAS) with accompanying FCC-approved signal boosters, a stipulation that is specified in the NFPA code.

“Their first reaction is: ‘I’m not going to spend $100,000. I’m going to pick up my building and move to another town,’” Daniel said.

Daniel said industry estimates put public-safety in-building communications at $0.50 to $0.75 per square foot. Many businesses would prefer to include public-safety and commercial communications together, but the price tag shoots up to about $1.50 per square foot, according to estimates from the Building Owners and Managers Association.

Much of that cost has to do with the inherent complexity of the DAS, which requires expensive equipment, engineering and testing. Moreover, cities want certified equipment and certified installers to be used and a building owner has to find a certified system designer as well. However, no uniform certification process exists, and requirements very based on locality; indeed, just one nationally recognized organization, Global Educational Services, certifies installers, creating a shortage of qualified people. Consequently, Daniel is developing his own certification program.

NFPA REQUIREMENTS

Chris Baker, a captain with the Roseville, Calif., Fire Department, also believes the lack of a factory-certified signal booster is a glaring need. Roseville has had an in-building public-safety communications ordinance since 2003. Despite the fact that signal boosters and amplifiers must be FCC type-accepted, there still aren’t officially certified products that building developers can trust to meet the in-building public-safety communications standards. Some local governments provide a list of preferred equipment, while others offer no guidance at all, Baker said. Often, the in-building integrator must meet with local governments to determine exactly what is needed.

The NFPA code has some other stipulations on in-building systems that contribute to the expense. Among other things, the NFPA code requires:

  • Backup batteries that provide 12 hours of 100% operation;
  • Signal boosters housed in NEMA Type-4 enclosures, with batteries housed in NEMA Type-4 waterproof enclosures;
  • Systems that provide 99% coverage in critical areas as designated by the local fire department, and 90% coverage in general-use areas;
  • Systems that are capable of transmitting on all local public-safety frequencies; one agency in a particular area might transmit on the 800 MHz band, while another remains on the VHF or UHF band; and
  • System components that all are compatible with local public-safety radio systems. (See graphic on page 34 for more requirements.)

For a city like Roseville, Calif., where a 2003 city ordinance mandates in-building public-safety communications for all new buildings that are 10,000 square feet above grade and 50,000 square feet below grade, building owners face a $50,000 price tag at a minimum, Baker said.

“It has been a development and a negotiation process,” Baker said of the city’s ordinance and the reaction it has received from building owners. “You have to justify the fact and figures of what you are requiring of these people. … Developers have a presence in the community, and they can appeal things.”

Daniel has been advising building owners to analyze such costs as they would any business expense, and encouraging them to amortize their systems over a span of 10 years. “Now instead of $100,000, it’s $10,000 per year,” Daniel said. “They have to amortize it like any capital investment.”

Daniel recently conducted an analysis of all office structures in the city of Los Angeles. Using realtor reports, and other metrics such as rental cost per square foot and occupancy rate, he determined that a building owner would have to add approximately $0.25 to each monthly rent over the amortization period to recoup the cost.

Daniel also advises building owners to market their buildings as having enhanced safety capabilities to potential tenants. “In-building coverage for public safety is a marketable item,” he said. Once building owners are educated, the resistance tends to subside, he said.

SHORT-TERM GOALS

While experts believe the proliferation of in-building public-safety communications will move at a snail’s pace, is there any way to speed up the process?

“The interesting question in my mind is: Will public-safety and commercial coverage converge? Right now you see projects where both are running on the same infrastructure,” Melester said. “Can they get the commercial carriers to pay for it?”

Indeed, most businesses are seeing a boom in mobile-phone usage, especially as work-friendly smartphones proliferate and operators begin to see a significant boost in mobile data usage. They are looking for ways to offload some of the traffic. Femtocells, also known as home base stations, have been touted as a way to ease some of the traffic congestion while enabling commercial operators to penetrate further into a building, where commercial coverage, like public-safety coverage, often suffers. Femtocells, however, are still in their infancy. Could the industry see some type of combined system moving forward that operators are willing to subsidize?

Today, Daniel sees many commercial and public-safety in-building systems running side by side rather than combined into one system. “Interactions between public-safety and cellular is the reason,” he said. “There are a lot of technical things different about cellular and public safety. … What creates a problem is when you have a system designed for a handset putting out 0.1 watts but an officer walks in with a unit that puts up 5 watts. All of a sudden the cellular system sees something that it’s not designed to handle.”

Increasingly, however, vendors are coming up with DAS solutions that incorporate a number of technologies and frequencies efficiently, but carry a higher price tag at this point.

TriPower, for instance, unveiled earlier this year a multi-carrier DAS manufactured by South Korea-based SOLiD Technologies. The system supports frequencies from 100 MHz — including support for VHF and UHF two-way systems, cellular and paging systems — to 2.5 GHz across one fiber backbone, and also includes support for the 700 MHz band, which public safety will use in the future. In addition, both WiMAX and LTE can be added as a slip-in module.

Cellular Specialties recently introduced a digital repeater that operates in the 700 and 800 MHz bands and features a software-defined filtering system to let users change frequencies over the air.

Meanwhile, Baker believes more local governments should be looking at ways to bolster the signals of their own systems, which could be done by levying impact fees, much like those imposed on businesses for everything from roads to 911 centers. The money, for instance, could be spent on building another site to bolster outdoor and indoor coverage of public-safety systems.

Of course, there will always be buildings that don’t have adequate coverage, but for many, the in-building communications problem could be minimized. The city of Roseville already is imposing an impact fee for public-safety communications in one area the city recently annexed for new development because of a lack of coverage in that area for public-safety communications.

“In terms of the future, that really needs to be looked at in terms of in-building coverage,” Baker said.

HIGHLIGHTS OF NFPA’S IN-BUILDING PUBLIC-SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS CODE

  • Backup batteries provide 12 hours of 100% operation;
  • Signal boosters are housed in NEMA Type-4 enclosures, with batteries housed in NEMA 4 waterproof enclosures;
  • Systems provide 99% coverage in critical areas as designated by the local fire department, and 90% coverage in general-use areas;
  • Buildings use distributed antenna systems with FCC-approved signal boosters;
  • Systems are capable of transmitting on all local public-safety frequencies;
  • All system components be compatible with local public-safety radio systems;
  • The system designer and operator are FCC-licensed; and
  • Building owners are contracted with a service provider that can provide two-hour response after being notified of a system failure.

Source: Jack Daniel

COST

Jack Daniel said industry estimates put public-safety in-building communications at $0.50 to $0.75 per square foot. Many businesses would prefer to include public-safety and commercial communications together, but the price tag shoots up to about $1.50 per square foot, according to estimates from the Building Owners and Managers Association.

IN-BUILDING COMMUNICATIONS COMPLEXITIES

  • DAS requires expensive equipment, engineering and testing.
  • Cities want certified equipment and installers to be used, but no uniform certification process exists.
  • Just one nationally recognized organization, Global Educational Services, certifies installers, creating a shortage of qualified people.
  • Despite the fact that signal boosters and amplifiers must be FCC type-accepted, there still aren’t officially certified products that building developers can trust to meet the in-building public-safety communications standards.

Related Stories

  • A new blueprint for an old problem
  • Businesses scramble to include public-safety in-building communications
  • In-building codification isn’t easy, but worth the effort
  • In-building systems a challenge for 800 MHz rebanding
  • In-building codification trend creates opportunity for vendors
Tags: Call Center/Command Policy Wireless Networks

Related


  • Professor calls for 5G moratorium over health fears; Omdia begs to differ
    t’s not what mobile network operators, suppliers and go-ahead governments want to hear. An essay by Professor John William Frank, published by the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, calls for a moratorium on further 5G rollout. Why? He wants further investigation into the next-gen tech’s “potentially harmful biological effects from radio frequency electromagnetic field […]
  • Jetting to the stars, using containers for development
    For an organization that sends rockets into space, stagnancy isn’t an option. Jetting to the stars requires technology, agility and a penchant for change. But much like for-profit environments, the U.S. Department of Defense struggles to move at the pace of business as it travels through the galaxy. It needs software development practices and platforms […]
  • ODD collaboration needed for autonomous-vehicle safety
    The creation of an operational design domain (ODD) will be an essential component to the widespread adoption and deployment of self-driving vehicles. ODDs–a term that defines all conceivable overlapping conditions, use cases, restrictions and scenarios that an AV might encounter–help with the development of autonomous vehicles, because they define where autonomous vehicles can function based […]
  • Hytera Communications, Motorola Solutions fail to reach royalty agreement
    Attorneys for Hytera Communications and Motorola Solutions acknowledged last week that they have not reached a royalty agreement through negotiation, so a federal judge likely must determine the type of royalty payments China-based Hytera Communications will make to Motorola Solutions when selling certain DMR products. Judge Charles Norgle of the United States District Court for […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Public safety needs a better way to triage emergency calls
  • Newscan: FBI received over 100,000 pieces of digital evidence after Capitol attack
  • Intelsat to test 4G connections to iPhones from stratosphere
  • Connected fleets and EVs could pose greatest cyber risk, says GuardKnox

Commentary


Public safety needs a better way to triage emergency calls

13th January 2021

In challenging year, working with public safety to move FirstNet forward

30th December 2020

Communications solutions must evolve quickly to meet needs of a changing world

31st October 2020
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: 📆 Mark Your Calendars: IWCE will be returning to Las Vegas this September and registration is slated to open in April 📆 Wa…

15th January 2021
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: ⚡FLASH SALE: Don't miss this exclusive offer! Passes to #IBFVirtual are now 50% off with code TWITTER50. Take advantage of th…

6th November 2020
UrgentComm

Get ready for part 2 of "Ensuring Public Safety Emergency Communications" next week! @PCTEL_inc will explore… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

3rd November 2020
UrgentComm

Over the past few months, we’ve seen the world transform, and it's clear that cities will be affected in the long-t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
UrgentComm

Florida state & local agencies subscribing to the Statewide Law Enforcement Radio System (SLERS) will be able to co… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
UrgentComm

Tune in to @slacorp CEO Josh Lober as he explains how the company has fully integrated its #PTT application to work… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
UrgentComm

.@SierraWireless announced the commercial availability of the AirLink MG90 platform, which they tout as the first m… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
UrgentComm

Attorneys for #Hytera and #MotorolaSolutions this week submitted final written arguments, apparently clearing a pat… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

22nd October 2020

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X