https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Commentary Newsletters


Asking America to fund first-responder network — what a concept

Asking America to fund first-responder network — what a concept

Yesterday, the FCC released its national broadband plan, which includes the controversial broadband wireless network for first responders. There are some aspects of the plan that I find troubling, starting with the decision to auction the commercial spectrum in the 700 MHz band -- the so-called D block, which failed to attract a qualifying bid two years ago -- rather than reallocating the airwaves to public safety, which desperately needs more spectrum.
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 16th March 2010

Yesterday, the FCC released its national broadband plan, which includes the controversial broadband wireless network for first responders. There are some aspects of the plan that I find troubling, starting with the decision to auction the commercial spectrum in the 700 MHz band — the so-called D block, which failed to attract a qualifying bid two years ago — rather than reallocating the airwaves to public safety, which desperately needs more spectrum.

I don’t believe that the 10 MHz D Block spectrum will be enough to elevate the likes of T-Mobile or Sprint Nextel enough to allow either to compete on the same level with the two behemoths — Verizon and AT&T — that dominate the commercial wireless landscape. Ostensibly, this is one of the reasons why some in Congress still want the D Block auctioned. Another is that the auction would put, theoretically, another sizeable chunk of money into the U.S. Treasury.

However, when you’re a nation facing a several-trillion-dollar deficit, the D Block proceeds — assuming that a successful auction ensues this time around, no sure thing — will amount to the proverbial “drop in the bucket.” I believe the better long-term play would have been to cede the airwaves to public safety.

Another aspect of the plan that troubles me is how the commercial and first-responder airwaves would be utilized. From the beginning, a shared network operated under the auspices of a public/private partnership was envisioned for this network. There was plenty of concern over how that ultimately would work, since such an endeavor would be unprecedented. Now that vision has changed, and this change has spawned one big concern.

The commission plans to let the commercial D Block winner operate its network independently, but is insisting that public safety be allowed to roam onto the network and to receive priority access when needed, both of which are essential. As usual, the devil will be in the details, so it is imperative that public safety ensure that any roaming and priority-access agreements it enters into with the commercial entity be both ironclad and watertight. It’s equally imperative that the FCC demonstrate the fortitude to enforce compliance — something that has not been the commission’s strong suit in recent years.

But wireless users roam onto independent networks every day and the call-set-up speeds of LTE reportedly are so fast — we’re talking milliseconds — that this anticipated arrangement shouldn’t cause first responders any significant problems.

However, a potentially vexing problem looms. Should the two networks indeed operate independently, some speculate that a guard band would be needed — and, should that be the case, it will need to be taken from public safety’s spectrum. Some experts believe the result would be slower data speeds for public safety, which could preclude certain high-bandwidth applications from being used by first responders and diminish any hopes that mission-critical voice one day would ride over this network.

Of course, giving first responders access to high-bandwidth applications that could save their lives — or the lives of those they are serving — is the whole point of the nationwide broadband network. Any action that would diminish the potential effectiveness of this vital network should be abandoned. If the FCC decides to do the opposite by carving the guard band out of public safety’s airwaves, it will be further evidence that it really isn’t listening to the sector, which has shouted long and loud about its need for MORE spectrum, not less.

There is one aspect of the national broadband plan I absolutely love, however. It calls for Congress to establish a funding mechanism for the network that will involve some sort of fee to be imposed on America’s broadband users. You might recall that I have written several times, since Morgan O’Brien first floated the idea for this network at IWCE four years ago, that Congress should reinstate the telephone excise tax and charge the nation’s 250 million wireless subscribers a monthly fee to pay for this network.

O’Brien suggested that this network would cost in the neighborhood of $20 billion, which would cost each wireless subscriber roughly 83 cents per month over a 20-year amortization cycle. I’m not a financial guy, so I freely admit that I haven’t factored in the cost of this money; I’m just trying to illustrate that in a nation whose citizens have no trouble forking out $5 for a cup of coffee on a daily basis, this network is within our collective reach.

In its national broadband plan, the FCC has asked Congress, through a broadband-user fee, to pony up $6.5 billion to build out a network that will cover 99% of the population. The commission also believes that the network’s operating costs will come to $1.3 billion annually by the 10th year of operation.

I think the commission is a little light in its estimates — I’d be willing to bet my house that the actual costs will be double what the FCC currently is estimating, based solely on the law of unforeseen consequences. And, if I were in charge, I’d still amortize the buildout and operating costs over the nation’s 250 million wireless subscribers, which would lighten the load considerably. After all, the first responder aspect of this initiative will benefit all Americans, not just broadband users.

But let’s say, for the sake of argument, that the FCC is correct in its estimates, and let’s assume that the commission moves forward with its current plan. There were roughly 70 million broadband users in the United States at the end of last year. Let’s amortize the $6.5 billion sought by the FCC across those users, over 120 months — the tab comes to 78 cents per month, per user. Now, let’s divvy up the $1.3 billion in annual operating costs over those same users. That would add $1.54 to what each user would pay per month. We’re still talking about less than what most Americans spend every day on coffee and soda pop.

The wonders of caffeine and high-fructose corn syrup aside, I believe Americans will get far greater benefit from this network, regardless of what it costs. I am certain that it will be worth the expenditure, as the nation’s first responders who risk their lives for us on a daily basis deserve nothing less. I am equally certain — and have been from the beginning — that it is entirely appropriate to ask Americans to pay for this network. After all, it is they who will benefit from it the most.

What do you think? Tell us in the comment box below.

Tags: Commentary Newsletters Policy & Law Commentary

Most Recent


  • Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis
    Every time I read about a public safety agency being short staffed, with a burnt-out workforce, draining their overtime budget, I feel their pain. From New York to New Mexico and in communities all across the nation, police and fire departments routinely are forced to mandate longer shifts, which takes an emotional toll and raises […]
  • Updated: How 'sidelink' peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations
    Editor’s note: A previous version of this column was posted that included only the first portion of the article—a mistake by the editor. IWCE’s Urgent Communications regrets the error and apologizes for any inconvenience. When first responders are called to action, they need reliable communications to coordinate an effective public-safety response. Public-safety personnel understand this […]
  • NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation
    As the new Congress begins its work in earnest, we look forward to continued progress in funding the transition to IP-based next-generation 911 (NG911) technology. Our nation’s 911 systems are critical to ensuring the safety and security of our communities, and nationwide implementation of NG911 will ensure these systems can leverage the most advanced communications […]
  • How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient
    It’s a scenario we’ve all experienced: an ambulance with a blaring siren racing against time to get a person in medical distress to a hospital through traffic. What we don’t see is 5G connectivity enabling paramedics to communicate with hospital staff via video conference and coordinate care in real-time before arriving at the emergency room. […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiator
  • Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces
  • Bridging digital divide by fostering digital inclusion and economic recovery
  • Public safety needs a better way to triage emergency calls

Commentary


Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023

Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.