https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Commentary Newsletters


Much to do in little time to make public-safety network a reality

Much to do in little time to make public-safety network a reality

The FCC's white paper indicates that the public-safety network can be built for as little as $6.3 billion, if the public-safety network is deployed at the same as a commercial network. The fundamental logic is that it is much less expensive for a crew to deploy infrastructure for two networks
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 29th April 2010

Late last week, the FCC released a white paper detailing the cost model for its planned deployment of a nationwide, 700 MHz wireless broadband network for public safety. Because FCC officials have been relatively open with their ideas, the white paper contained few surprises, but it did provide a greater level of granularity about its proposal.

Most notably, the white paper indicates that the public-safety network can be built for as little as $6.3 billion, if the public-safety network is deployed at the same as a commercial network. The fundamental logic is that it is much less expensive for a crew to deploy infrastructure for two networks (one for commercial, the other for public safety) on a single trip to a given site than to do the same work in separate trips.

How great is the difference? According to the FCC, a standalone public-safety network would cost $15.7 billion, or about 150% more than building out the network in conjunction with commercial carriers. In addition, the FCC’s projected operating costs of a shared network for the first decade of existence would be $6 billion to $10 billion. Meanwhile, projected operating costs for a standalone network would be $25 billion to $30 billion.

The good news is that the FCC’s estimated cost of $40 billion to $46 billion for a standalone network is in the ballpark of the estimates that commercial operators provided more than two years ago, adding legitimacy to the projections. Of course, the bad news is that $40 billion is a lot of money, particularly in a down economy — and, by comparison, the $12 billion to $16 billion price tag the FCC has placed on a shared network seems like a bargain.

Given this, it is paramount that the public-safety network be built in conjunction with commercial networks to make the FCC cost vision realistic. If this cannot be done, the FCC’s request to Congress for financial support for the public-safety network — $6.5 billion for capital expenditures and additional operational funding authorization — won’t come close to being enough.

While other 700 MHz commercial licensees exist, the primary commercial partnership options for public safety appear to be Verizon Wireless, AT&T and the carrier (or carriers) that win the D Block auction the FCC plans to conduct early next year. Providing public safety with flexibility and choices in partners is a major tenet of the FCC plan.

While partnering with a D Block licensee should not be an issue, the problem is that Verizon Wireless plans to launch 700 MHz LTE service in 30 markets covering about one-third of the U.S. population by the end of the year. AT&T is not expected to be far behind in its 4G rollouts.

These rollout plans raise a legitimate question whether the window of opportunity to have a simultaneous buildout with these two wireless giants has closed. In an interview with Urgent Communications yesterday, Jamie Barnett — chief of the FCC’s public safety and homeland security bureau — said he believes last week’s establishment of the Emergency Response Interoperability Center (ERIC) will help ensure that the technical requirements are in place in time for public-safety entities seeking waivers to be early movers can “catch the technological wave” in their buildouts.

Another nagging issue in the FCC plan is the relationship between the D Block winner and public safety. If public safety chooses to partner with the D Block winner in a shared network model, there should be no trouble with the D Block licensee and public safety being able to use their respective 10 MHz of 700 MHz broadband spectrum.

However, if public safety chooses to partner with another carrier or build its own network — the only options for waiver entities, because there is no D Block licensee right now — many industry sources believe a guard band will be needed between public safety and a commercial D Block winner.

Barnett said the FCC’s “preliminary indications” are that a guard band will not be needed, if both the public-safety and commercial networks use LTE, as called for in the current FCC vision.

“We were also influenced by the fact that spectrum allocations for LTE in other countries really don’t include guard bands between adjacent operators, so I don’t know why we wouldn’t be able to achieve the same efficiencies here,” Barnett said.

While no explicit guard band exists between some U.S. 700 MHz spectrum allocations, industry sources have told me that carriers have built in spectral buffers — internal guard bands, if you will — to avoid interference issues. Regardless of the actual solution, the guard-band situation needs be resolved quickly, so both public-safety entities and D Block licensees can accurately assess how much usable spectrum they will have before investing millions — or billions — into networks.

Meanwhile, some have questioned whether the FCC’s cost figures are accurate. It’s certainly a topic worthy of review and debate, but the number of potential variables is so great that they can’t be addressed within this column.

What is clear is that there are number of questions surrounding the proposed public-safety network that need to be answered quickly. These issues have to resolved soon — in the next several months, if not weeks — so Congress can take appropriate funding/spectral actions and public-safety entities can have the option of building out their LTE networks in conjunction with commercial carriers, as the FCC has envisioned.

To the FCC’s credit, the establishment of ERIC is a sign that agency officials understand the urgency of the situation, but it is important that this sentiment be shared by lawmakers on Capitol Hill for the agency’s plan to be realized. If this is not done, the cost of a public-safety network promises to be dramatically higher.

What do you think? Tell us in the comment box below.

Tags: Commentary Newsletters Networks & Systems Commentary

Most Recent


  • Updated: How 'sidelink' peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations
    Editor’s note: A previous version of this column was posted that included only the first portion of the article—a mistake by the editor. IWCE’s Urgent Communications regrets the error and apologizes for any inconvenience. When first responders are called to action, they need reliable communications to coordinate an effective public-safety response. Public-safety personnel understand this […]
  • NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation
    As the new Congress begins its work in earnest, we look forward to continued progress in funding the transition to IP-based next-generation 911 (NG911) technology. Our nation’s 911 systems are critical to ensuring the safety and security of our communities, and nationwide implementation of NG911 will ensure these systems can leverage the most advanced communications […]
  • How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient
    It’s a scenario we’ve all experienced: an ambulance with a blaring siren racing against time to get a person in medical distress to a hospital through traffic. What we don’t see is 5G connectivity enabling paramedics to communicate with hospital staff via video conference and coordinate care in real-time before arriving at the emergency room. […]
  • 3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024
    The latest set of 3GPP Plenary electronic meetings (e-meetings) concluded on Dec. 19, 2022. The meetings focused on the Release 18 (R18) feature progress and schedule. It was decided to extend the R18 freeze date (specifications complete for all R18 features) by three months to March 2024 to ensure the quality of the R18 3GPP […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiator
  • Ransomware? Let's call it what it really is: extortionware
  • Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces
  • Hi-tech sewer can help safeguard public health, environment and economies

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Gallery: The last day of IWCE 2023 dlvr.it/SllQKJ

30th March 2023
UrgentComm

Video: Opening of the Expo Hall on day three of IWCE 2023 dlvr.it/SlkyNy

30th March 2023
UrgentComm

Verizon officials highlight role of 5G tech for responders during IWCE keynote dlvr.it/Slkh9n

30th March 2023
UrgentComm

Day three of IWCE 2023 features the opening of the Expo Hall dlvr.it/Slhgvr

30th March 2023
UrgentComm

Gallery: The Expo Hall opens on day three of IWCE 2023 dlvr.it/SlhfPT

29th March 2023
UrgentComm

Rescue 42 launches miniCRD deployable for FirstNet dlvr.it/SlgdtY

29th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: 📽️ More sights from Day 2 at #IWCE23. It's been a fantastic start so far... Thanks to you! Tomorrow is another awesome spea…

29th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: Ildefonso De La Cruz Morales, Principal Analyst-Critical Communications @OmdiaHQ takes the stage and kicks off tonight’s Keyn…

29th March 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.