https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Commentary Newsletters


Essential elements of a successful public-safety network

Essential elements of a successful public-safety network

As debate has intensified over one aspect of the National Broadband Plan -- the amount of spectrum allocated directly to public safety -- there is a danger that we will lose sight of those issues more likely to make the difference between success and failure.
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 13th July 2010

We know from tragedy after tragedy that, to protect the American people, first responders need a modern nationwide communications infrastructure. Although systems have improved in some regions, little has changed nationwide since Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the 9/11 attacks in 2001, or even the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. 2010 may be a defining moment, when this nation either commits to solving this problem, or abandons nationwide interoperable communications for first responders for the foreseeable future.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently released the National Broadband Plan, which includes a comprehensive set of recommendations to create such a network, and Congress has begun hearings. As debate has intensified over one aspect of the plan — the amount of spectrum allocated directly to public safety — there is a danger that we will lose sight of those issues more likely to make the difference between success and failure.

Long before joining the FCC, I spent years striving to improve public safety communications, working directly for public-safety agencies and establishing a public-safety research program at Carnegie Mellon University, where I was a professor. Beginning with a paper published in 2005, my work demonstrated why this country needs a nationwide wireless network for public safety, and why federal resources are needed. A network that meets public-safety standards is more expensive than one that merely meets commercial standards. Who pays for this? Commercial providers may be willing to pay in return for spectrum, but only where spectrum is sufficiently valuable. One Carnegie Mellon study found that even if access to 20 MHz of spectrum is offered for free — but with an obligation to meet public-safety standards — commercial providers would find the arrangement unprofitable in all rural and most suburban areas. Moreover, localities saying they might deploy public-safety networks using their own funds also tend to be big cities. Accordingly, most of the country would lack the resources without some new funding source.

In the National Broadband Plan, the FCC for the first time called for federal funding that would make a nationwide network possible, using $12 to $16 billion over 10 years to reach 99% of the population.

There are five crucial elements to a successful policy:

  • An adequate funding mechanism. Otherwise, it is only possible to deploy a network that meets public safety needs in a small portion of the country.
  • A core network designed to public-safety standards, not commercial standards. Otherwise, first responders cannot count on the system for mission-critical functions.
  • A single, nationwide network, or more likely, a network in each region and an effective Interoperability Center to ensure compatibility. Otherwise, the system is vulnerable to interoperability failures and costly inconsistencies.
  • Mass-produced equipment and open standards wherever appropriate, rather than equipment customized for public safety. Otherwise, equipment costs are greater, and the rate of innovation slower.
  • Priority access to commercial networks. In the worst possible emergencies, however much capacity first responders have, they will want more, and priority roaming is the most effective way to provide it. Resilience is also improved; when a hurricane brings one network down, others may still operate.

A policy with these five elements can be highly effective, whether the network uses 10 MHz as currently allocated, or 20 MHz as some propose. A policy that lacks any of these elements should be viewed as inadequate, whether the network uses 10 or 20 MHz. The National Broadband Plan provides a roadmap to achieving all five.

Unfortunately, while people outside public safety debate whether this is the best way to spend $12-16 billion, the public safety community has instead focused on whether to reallocate the D Block, increasing the spectrum used for this network from 10 to 20 MHz.

When trying to achieve the five elements above, there are advantages to auctioning D block for commercial use. First, funding is essential. Congress is currently considering a discussion draft of legislation that would put D Block auction proceeds towards the public-safety network. Some experts value the D Block at around half the FCC’s estimated capital expenditures. The White House also said public safety should have “first claim” to auction proceeds.

Second, public safety should have access to consumer-electronics priced equipment. As a condition of the auction, the FCC could require D Block licensees to provide equipment that operates in both commercial and public safety spectrum, ensuring that public safety can obtain equipment that is mass produced, and is therefore less costly.

Third, public-safety agencies and a D Block licensee may deploy simultaneously, and if they choose to partner, the resulting cost savings would support more infrastructure within a limited budget. Moreover, with 10 MHz of spectrum and enough funding to meet FCC recommendations, public safety will have far more spectrum per user than commercial smartphone users can ever hope for, now and for years to come, substantial capacity (thanks to the recommended 44,000 cell sites), and the ability to roam onto commercial networks with priority.

Nevertheless, I understand why some public safety advocates would prefer 20 MHz to 10 MHz if this can be done without sacrificing any of the five crucial elements above. I cannot understand why a few have suggested that reallocating D Block to public safety is the only important issue. Apparently, they would sacrifice the funding that makes deployment possible outside large cities, sacrifice the ability to replace $6,000 radios customized for public safety with better $500 radios built on open standards, sacrifice the ability to avoid the interoperability problems that plagued past systems, or sacrifice the ability to use commercial networks during major disasters, for an extra 10 MHz.

Some mistakenly believe this would make mobile 1.2 Mbps video cameras possible; it wouldn’t. A handful of densely populated municipalities and companies might profit if the D Block were reallocated at the expense of these five essential elements, but for the rest of the country, compromising on these essential elements is like buying a car because it has a great stereo and not caring whether the car has an engine.

What do you think? Tell us in the comment box below.

John Peha is the FCC’s chief technologist.

Tags: Commentary Newsletters Interoperability Commentary Policy & Law Commentary

Most Recent


  • Updated: How 'sidelink' peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations
    Editor’s note: A previous version of this column was posted that included only the first portion of the article—a mistake by the editor. IWCE’s Urgent Communications regrets the error and apologizes for any inconvenience. When first responders are called to action, they need reliable communications to coordinate an effective public-safety response. Public-safety personnel understand this […]
  • NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation
    As the new Congress begins its work in earnest, we look forward to continued progress in funding the transition to IP-based next-generation 911 (NG911) technology. Our nation’s 911 systems are critical to ensuring the safety and security of our communities, and nationwide implementation of NG911 will ensure these systems can leverage the most advanced communications […]
  • How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient
    It’s a scenario we’ve all experienced: an ambulance with a blaring siren racing against time to get a person in medical distress to a hospital through traffic. What we don’t see is 5G connectivity enabling paramedics to communicate with hospital staff via video conference and coordinate care in real-time before arriving at the emergency room. […]
  • 3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024
    The latest set of 3GPP Plenary electronic meetings (e-meetings) concluded on Dec. 19, 2022. The meetings focused on the Release 18 (R18) feature progress and schedule. It was decided to extend the R18 freeze date (specifications complete for all R18 features) by three months to March 2024 to ensure the quality of the R18 3GPP […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiator
  • Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces
  • Bridging digital divide by fostering digital inclusion and economic recovery
  • Public safety needs a better way to triage emergency calls

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

State and local leaders can alleviate the burden on public-safety personnel by tackling three workforce trends dlvr.it/SlBH89

20th March 2023
UrgentComm

6G is shaping up to disappoint, and the industry can blame itself dlvr.it/Sl918J

20th March 2023
UrgentComm

Change is coming to the network detection and response (NDR) market dlvr.it/Sl4cts

18th March 2023
UrgentComm

Telcos need to build businesses, as well as networks dlvr.it/Sl4cRR

18th March 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.