https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Commentary Newsletters


The readers always write: Multiband not a radio panacea

The readers always write: Multiband not a radio panacea

Recently I wrote a column that questioned why we hear more about digital-radio enhancements for the fire service than we do about using multiband radios. I received a tremendous amount of feedback on the topic. Readers brought up important points about why multiband isn’t ready for service, including the fact that it only operates in one band at a time and is too expensive for public safety to afford.
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 31st March 2011

Recently I wrote a column that questioned why we hear more about digital-radio enhancements for the fire service than we do about using multiband radios. I received a tremendous amount of feedback on the topic. Readers brought up important points about why multiband isn’t ready for service, including the fact that it only operates in one band at a time and is too expensive for public safety to afford.

Unsurprisingly, cost was a major concern. One reader commented that multiband vendors are 10 years late and $3,000 too expensive, saying it if they had come to market with Part 90 dual/multiband radios earlier, perhaps they would be on their second- or third-generation prototypes.

“I know of a Chinese manufacturer that finally came out with an affordable [analog] dual-band certified for Part 90,” the reader said. “They are cleaning up at $130 each.”

Because of the cost, another reader commented that users — not multiband manufacturers — have identified ways around radio communications gaps by preplanning, sharing radios, using portable cross-band repeaters, gateways and equipment rather than purchasing expensive and complex devices multiband radios for multiple personnel in the field.

“The vendors just don’t get it, they keep wasting time and money on R&D to come up with these expensive pieces of equipment that are supposed to be the solutions to all of our problems when the truth is most government agencies can’t afford equipment like this,” the reader said, pointing to Project 25 as a perfect example.

It’s a good point. Why should an agency spend $2,800 per radio for P25 technology when they can purchase a radio that will get the job done for less than $700? If agencies are not going to spend $2,800 per radio for P25, they definitely are not going to spend $5,000-plus per radio for multiband capability.

“In fact, many volunteer departments — which make up the majority of the fire service — can’t afford P25 and would rather use existing analog radios and invest in other equipment, such as tankers and bunker gear,” he said. “The price point just isn’t there yet.”

“Please explain to me who out of my 45 volunteer firefighters gets the radio assuming I can come up with another $2,200 beyond my yearly budget line,” he said. “And who is that lucky individual going to talk to if we only have one radio…just saying.”

All one fire chief wants is a reliable, durable, affordable radio. He can’t afford to buy a portable radio for $5,000 within his current budget, which isn’t “improving anytime soon,” he said.

In addition, users can only listen to one frequency at a time with multibands. While the radio receiver can scan multiband channels, there is only one receiver and one transmitter and being able only to hear one channel at a time defeats the purpose of a multiband radio. In fact, readers agree with California State Firefighters’ Association President Kevin Nida about carrying two radios, saying that at least with two different radios, users can listen to two different channels at a time. But if the multiband radio scans and stops on the 800 channel, users lose anything that may be said on the VHF channel as long as the 800 is still talking.

“That isn’t interoperability,” the reader said. “It’s a disaster waiting to happen if you miss an important message on the channel you can’t hear.”

One reader showed support for my column, saying “I agree with you wholeheartedly.” He said he’s been trying to push manufacturers to make multiband radios for years. He works in a jurisdiction where systems range from VHF to 800 MHz from analog to digital P25, and then there are those areas with encryption and other systems like LTE. He hates having to carry five different radios, depending on the incident location.

“It is still such a shame the Big M and other companies still choose to make proprietary equipment just to make a sale and make it so only their radios have to be bought to work,” he wrote. “I thought the whole idea of the FCC’s changes and 9/11 was so that we all can talk with each other.

“Greedy manufacturers all hell bent on the almighty dollar instead of saving lives,” the reader wrote.

On the other hand, another excused me for being out of touch, saying the rush to “better” digital radios has cost municipalities millions and left many with unreliable, unnecessarily complex radio systems.

“In many cases, the digital systems replaced an analog system that worked fine most of the time, certainly more than the problematic digital system,” he said. “Cities are laying off firefighters and police because they can’t afford to pay them. Meanwhile, you are beating the drum for them to start buying complex MBR’s at $5k a copy. You are far out of touch with reality.”

There were so many comments that I can’t include them all here. But I would like to conclude with a reader’s comment that struck me as funny, but also straightforward. Radio vendors, are you listening?

WANTED: Radio for large multiagency incidents. Multiband radio shipped standard with:

  • Dual-band receive with independent volume control
  • Multiple PTT options
  • More emphasis on conventional rather than trunking
  • Front panel programming for conventional channels
  • Cloning of a single zone/group/bank (not entire radio)
  • Ability to build tactical/command group from pre-programmed channels/Talk-groups
  • Peer to Peer GPS position reporting without infrastructure required
  • AA “clamshell” battery
  • Ruggedized and water/slurry/sweat/rain/porta-pond resistant
  • VHF antenna that is flexible, not rigid
  • Antenna connection that does not pull out of radio with inductor in tow
  • As few interconnected PCB’s as possible
  • Easily interchangeable audio accessories that do not require tools to change
  • Programming software that does not change every other week
  • Programming software that is backwards compatible
  • Programming software that can import MS Excel spreadsheet
  • Cost that does not require a bond issue on ballot

Yea, it’s like asking for ice cream on the Sun.

Related Stories

  • Off to a good start: How multiband radios improve interoperability
  • Will multiband radio replace PS in network build-out?
Tags: Commentary Newsletters Mobile Voice Commentary

Most Recent


  • LTE and liability: Why the fire service must move forward with digital incident command
    The grief following a firefighter line-of-duty death (LODD) is beyond words. Fellow firefighters are devastated. Families are shattered. In the aftermath, questions arise about the circumstances: Was the loss preventable? What was the chain of actions leading to the catastrophe? Central to these questions is the role of incident command (IC), the command’s situational awareness, […]
  • Partnership and collaboration must be the foundation for emergency communications
    I’m from a little town in West Texas. As a Texan, I like getting straight to the point: I believe that emergency communications are a matter of national security. Because this message is so important, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has designated this April as the first-ever Emergency Communications Month. At CISA, we […]
  • FirstNet success means no hypothetical 'shots' need to be fired, Swenson says
    As public-safety officials today commemorate the 10-year anniversary of the FirstNet Authority being created, the deployment of the FirstNet nationwide public-safety broadband network (NPSBN) has proceeded well enough that no one needs to face a firing squad, according to former Authority board Chair Sue Swenson. “Save it for another time,” Swenson said during a recent […]
  • Show support for law enforcement on National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day
    This coming Sunday, January 9th, is National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day—a well-deserved day to thank and show support to law-enforcement officers for their dedication to duty and service to their local communities, as well as protecting the people who live and work in the communities. On behalf of L3Harris, a Florida-based company that provides critical […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiator
  • Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces
  • Public safety needs a better way to triage emergency calls
  • In challenging year, working with public safety to move FirstNet forward

Commentary


LTE and liability: Why the fire service must move forward with digital incident command

  • 2
6th May 2022

Partnership and collaboration must be the foundation for emergency communications

18th April 2022

FirstNet success means no hypothetical ‘shots’ need to be fired, Swenson says

22nd February 2022
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Newscan: 911 dispatcher may be fired over handling of Buffalo shooting call dlvr.it/SQf0fq

19th May 2022
UrgentComm

The MSP downstream cyberthreat paradox: Understanding the city and county connection dlvr.it/SQbls1

18th May 2022
UrgentComm

Long-haul autonomous truck revealed dlvr.it/SQSczK

16th May 2022
UrgentComm

5G proponents fret over Biden’s fiber fancy dlvr.it/SQSYCp

16th May 2022
UrgentComm

Log4Shell exploit threatens enterprise data lakes, AI poisoning dlvr.it/SQRMng

16th May 2022
UrgentComm

Newscan: EV-infrastructure cyber vulnerabilities put cars, the grid at risk dlvr.it/SQKjJW

13th May 2022
UrgentComm

Motorola Solutions continues buying spree with Videotec acquisition dlvr.it/SQKHHs

13th May 2022
UrgentComm

Black Hat Asia: Firmware supply-chain woes plague device security dlvr.it/SQJZfs

13th May 2022

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X