https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Wireless Networks


Good investment

Good investment

The importance of regular tower and site maintenance cannot be underestimated.
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st October 2011

Those structures located in hurricane-prone areas should be inspected annually for loose hardware and to ensure that antenna and transmission line attachments are secure. Proper tower maintenance not only helps to maximize the lifespan of the tower, but also helps to maximize the lifespan and financial investment of the radio system.

The key to tower maintenance is the annual inspection of the mechanical structure itself. A good tower crewman will perform a light inspection from the ground each time before climbing, and will subconsciously inspect the tower every step he ascends. However, a thorough, in-depth and all-encompassing inspection consisting of several hundred points should be accomplished on a regular basis.

The Telecommunications Industry Association produced the Structural Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas (TIA-222-G is the current revision) which, in addition to procedure, outlines a recommended schedule for tower inspections. This is typically every three years for a guyed tower and five years for a self-support tower, but is recommended annually for coastal areas that are subject to corrosive salt air and high winds. (See Table 1 below.)

The first and most important step is to inspect the tower from the ground. A visual inspection to assess obvious damage to the structure will go a long way toward protecting tower crews from placing themselves in an unsafe situation. It is quite common for unprotected guy points or tower bases to be damaged by vehicles, tractors and lawn mowers — especially lawn mowers. A visual structural inspection should include careful investigation of tower members and guy point foundations, guy point termination plates (including below grade), turnbuckles and sleeves, as well as the alignment of the guy wires and the tower itself.

Most deformations in the tower, which could be a sign of structural damage, can be spotted from the ground. Another important consideration, for guyed towers, is the level of corrosion exhibited by the cotter pins that keep guy wire shackles in place on the guy termination plate. Rusty cotter pins, even more than severely faded paint on a tower, can indicate the lack of a proper maintenance program and should serve as a warning of caution to crews preparing to work at height.

Following the visual inspection on the ground, the inspection continues on the tower and includes documentation, with pictures and recorded heights, of any current or potential defects. Given this information, the owner can undertake corrective action and can track trouble spots and trends that will need to be addressed in the future. The structural inspection at height should include, at a minimum, an assessment of tower legs, cross members, climbing facilities, guy point shackles, tension arms, platforms and walkways, and of course the nuts and bolts that hold it all together. For the proper inspection of large self-supporting towers and monopoles, it also is necessary to rappel down the tower faces that are opposite the climbing face.

While on the tower, the assessor also will evaluate the condition of either the galvanization or the aviation orange and white paint that has been applied to the structure. Galvanization will last the lifetime of the tower, typically only requiring minor repairs due to scratches accumulated during tower delivery and stacking, or from installation of additional hardware such as antenna and cellular sector mounts. On the other hand, a good paint job will last five to eight years at the most and the maintenance of tower paint is crucial to the life of the structure.

Once a tower is painted, the paint always must be kept to Federal Aviation Administration color standards according to FAA Circular AC70/7460-1K. There are two important points to consider. First, the FAA only allows a slight variation in color tolerance, measured on the upper half of the tower, according to its In-Service Orange Color Range chart, and violators of this requirement risk a hefty fine. Second, once the paint on the tower begins to flake off, it takes the under coat of galvanization with it. This exposes the vulnerable steel underneath to the corrosive effects of moisture and salt air — hence the requirement for more routine inspections in coastal regions. For a hollow leg tower, such corrosion can shorten the lifespan of the structure by more than half. Like the cotter pins, the condition of the paint on a tower is an indication of the level and quality of the maintenance provided to the structure. If the paint is bad, chances are the rest of the tower has been neglected as well.

Under current rules, the tower paint does not need to meet FAA color tolerances if the lighting system — on towers that are required to be lighted — is converted from a night-only red-light beacon system to a day/night white strobe system. However, this approach often leads tower owners to neglect the necessary maintenance of painted towers required for the reasons outlined above.

The process used in repainting a tower can extend the life of the paint by several years. Done correctly, a paint job will have at least four steps designed to completely prepare the structure prior to the application of a new coat of paint. If the job is done cheaply, you could be repainting the tower every few years.

Weather also plays an important role in the application of the paint, which needs to be accomplished according to the guidelines of the paint manufacturer.

The steps that should be completed at a minimum are as follows:

  • Inspect the tower from top to bottom in order to identify elements that exhibit severe corrosion damage that need to be either replaced or more thoroughly treated before repainting.
  • Execute a rough scrape to remove flaking paint and eliminate any potential for moisture to be trapped and cause corrosion underneath a new paint job.
  • Treat the tower for rust, preferably with a solution that stops the corrosion process by converting the rust from iron oxide to iron phosphate.
  • Use a high quality, non-lead-based paint of the appropriate colors.

Just as with the paint color, the lighting requirements on towers over 200 feet, or within five miles of an airfield, are strictly controlled by the FAA. (These guidelines also are outlined in FAA Circular AC70/7460-1K.) Failure to follow them could result in fines in excess of $10,000 per day. Within 30 minutes of the failure of any flashhead (either red or white strobe light) on the tower or of either of the two incandescent bulbs in a beacon (slow flashing red light), a Notice to Airmen must be filed with the FAA.

This typically is accomplished with a brief call to the NOTAM hotline and providing the tower’s antenna registration number. Upon filing, the owner of the structure has 15 days to complete repairs or extend the NOTAM. Once the notice is filed, airplane and helicopter pilots are notified of the structure’s lighting failure and are required to avoid the structure. The FAA is much more lenient for marker bulbs (steady burning lights), only requiring replacement when more than one marker is out at any marker level.

Obstruction lighting systems are susceptible to failure for many reasons including normal fatigue, lightning, sun damage and moisture, and provide another reason why inspections are so important for tower owners. As previously mentioned, routine tower inspections allow owners to track trends that will need to be addressed in the future and to budget for parts and labor. For example, moisture leaks in flashheads and beacons lead to corrosion of electrical parts and connections. This is especially true in flashheads, as the dissipated energy from the strobe interacts with the moisture, which creates ozone. This ozone is a powerful oxidizer and will rapidly decompose exposed metal, leaving a bluish-green tinted coating.

The different types of obstruction lighting systems require various levels of maintenance and range from simple to very complex. A typical incandescent lighting system includes 120 VAC power, a timing circuit and sometimes a dry contact alarm for notification of lighting failure. For the average medium-intensity strobe system, the 1,000 VDC electrical system is more complex and involves multiple timing and charging circuits, resistor-capacitor circuits and transformers. In addition, xenon flashtube systems contain circuit boards with integrated circuits that are more susceptible to power surges and EMI pulses from lightning strikes.

Many tower owners are transitioning to light-emitting diode technologies to improve reliability. While operable on normal 120 VAC power sources, LED units have the same vulnerabilities as do strobe systems, but usually are more expensive to maintain. LEDs do not need replacement as often as incandescent lamps as they do not burn out like normal light bulbs, but instead short-circuit. Often, a few LEDs can fail and the system still will meet FAA requirements for luminosity, which allows for continued use of the flashhead. However, should enough damage be done to LED circuits to drop the brightness of the flashhead below FAA standards, then the entire flashhead might need to be replaced. Most manufacturers do not sell LED flashhead parts for field repair, and opening a flashhead will violate any warranty. In such cases, re-lamping becomes much more expensive than just replacing a single flash tube or bulb.

The final part of any tower inspection should include a physical evaluation of the structure’s various transmission lines, jumpers, connectors and antennas. Transmission lines should be inspected visually along their entire length for signs of damage or fatigue to the outer plastic jacket. Although transmission lines do not require a lot of maintenance, the do have a finite lifespan and are susceptible to damage from the installation of additional antennas, mounts or cellular sectors.

Transmission line hoist grips and line hangers also should be checked and replaced when required, as these mechanically secure the line to the tower. Like transmission lines, antenna jumpers don’t typically need maintenance, but they do get old. More importantly, the weatherproofing on the connectors between the transmission lines, jumpers and antennas should be inspected to make sure it still provides a viable weather seal. If this is questionable, the weatherproofing should be removed to check for corrosion inside the connector, or at least be documented for the customer. Mechanically, antennas require a close-up visual inspection of the mounting hardware, elements and wiring. Charring from electrical sparking and any obvious signs of damage might suggest further electrical testing or an antenna replacement. Hardware corrosion on the antenna mounts should be addressed and corrected to reduce expensive or unexpected repairs in the future.

While the tower is being inspected at height, return loss sweeps of the transmission lines and jumpers can be performed from the ground. Using specialized test equipment, the electrical viability of the transmission signal conductor can be tested from the radio to the antenna. Line sweeps can provide system owners with distance-to-fault (DTF) and voltage-standing-wave-ratio (VSWR) measurements.

The DTF test can provide a distance up the tower in which a problem (defect) could be occurring in the transmission line. Coupled with a climber already visually inspecting the tower, return loss measurements become a powerful tool to quickly locate, evaluate and resolve immediate problems or future issues. More than one transmission line has been repaired due to damage from gunfire.

The SWR test provides a measurement of impedance mismatch that causes a reflection in transmitted power back to the transmitter instead of into the antenna. The ideal VSWR ratio is 1:1 with no reflected power. If the antenna system is old (more than six years), transmission lines and/or jumpers should be disconnected and isolated from the antennas, terminated into 50-ohm loads and then swept. The purpose of this test is to verify the transmission line as a viable component. By so doing, the inspector on the tower has an opportunity to remove old weatherproofing, check for corrosion in the connector and reseal the connections prior to making the final antenna system sweeps.

With a well-thought-out maintenance program and very little planning, a system owner can ensure that the single-most important aspect of any radio system performs to the level for which it was designed, for as long as possible. Tower structures that reach several hundred feet in the air do not come cheaply or easily, but they still are relied upon every day by public-safety agencies.

Ed: Part 2 of this series will present recommended practices for the care and maintenance of radio sites and allied structures.

Todd Mechler began his career with the U.S. Air Force as an electronics technician. He has an electrical engineering degree from Florida State University with a specialization in RF communications. Mechler is a project manager and consultant for Covington, La.–based Tusa Consulting Services and co-owns Southeastern Towers LLC, a tower maintenance and service company in Florida.

Tags: Wireless Networks

Most Recent


  • The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless
    Verizon had high hopes for private wireless networking. The company had predicted that by now it would be well on its way to making billions of dollars from the sale of custom 4G and 5G networks dedicated exclusively to its enterprise customers. Indeed, during 2021 Verizon execs pegged the total addressable market for private wireless at around […]
  • NATE: Todd Schlekeway highlights organization's safety, legislative initiatives
    Todd Schlekeway, executive director of NATE: The Communications Infrastructure Contractors Association, discusses many of NATE’s planned activities for 2023, including a legislative visit to Capitol Hill in May, safety/training initiatives, and a broader release of the Vertical Freedom documentary that focuses on the lives of tower climbers in the communication arena.  
  • AT&T boasts of core 'white box' success in 5G, fiber push
    AT&T said it has now migrated more than 52% of all of its production traffic onto next-generation “white box” core routers running on products from the likes of Broadcom and DriveNets. The company said its move to such “open” systems has helped its aggressive 5G and fiber expansions. “We announced the next-gen open disaggregated core routing […]
  • AT&T wireless growth keyed by FirstNet—now provides 24,000 agencies with 4.4 million connections
    AT&T this week reported that FirstNet ended 2022 supporting more than 24,000 public-safety agencies with “about” 4.4 million connections, including 377,000 connections that were added during the last three months of 2022—a total that represents more than half of the carrier’s post-paid wireless growth for the quarter. AT&T officials released these figures in conjunction with […]

2 comments

  1. Avatar Jangchu Dorji 2nd September 2013 @ 10:35 am
    Reply

    My company want to have
    My company want to have assessment for the old microwave towers which was built around early 1970’s. In this, we want to know how safe is this towers and how long it can safely withstand the structure itself. Please share your experty knowledge and how to go ahead about its findings.

    Best Regards.

    Jangchu
    BHUTAN.

  2. Avatar Cheap Jordans Free Shipping 9th July 2018 @ 3:01 am
    Reply

    Shopping online through My
    Shopping online through My shop provides the liberty to customer of choosing the best cheap Jordan shoes that are available in our store. They do not have to go from one shop to another because we have the complete line of high quality shoes. Moreover, we also offer free shipping for items that meet the requirements such as volume purchase. Our credibility as a dependable online retailer is backed by a consistent inventory of all possible styles and edition of your favorite shoes.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • The battle over connected cars drags on
  • UK officials revamp ESN plans again, target Airwave-to-LTE transition for end of 2026
  • PSCR: Dereck Orr highlights features of June 21-24 virtual event
  • FirstNet buildout on pace for March 2023 completion, AT&T official says

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

ChatGPT may be fastest-growing app of all time, UBS Says dlvr.it/Sj4NfL

7th February 2023
UrgentComm

Public-safety coalition renews efforts to secure federal NG911 funding dlvr.it/ShwGfn

4th February 2023
UrgentComm

Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny dlvr.it/Shvpw3

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless dlvr.it/Shth0P

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them ‘verified’ Cloud Partner status dlvr.it/Shqngn

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Shapeshifting robot can morph from a liquid to a solid dlvr.it/Shqk9K

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Automakers against stampede to BEV dominance dlvr.it/ShpX08

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

FCC nominee Gigi Sohn headed for third Senate hearing dlvr.it/ShpDcZ

1st February 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.