https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • WHY ATTEND
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Registration Opens April 2019-Join Our Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Urgent Matters


Commentary

BART erred when it disrupted its patrons’ wireless service

BART erred when it disrupted its patrons’ wireless service

Some argue that BART was within its legal rights because it didn’t prevent commercial carriers from transmitting their signals; rather, it blocked patrons from receiving them. That strikes me as a specious distinction, akin to adhering to the letter of the law, but not its spirit.
  • Written by
  • 21st June 2012

In the July edition of Urgent Communications, which ships to the printer next week, Senior Editor Mary Rose Roberts explores the decision made by the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit district, or BART, to block commercial wireless signals in some of its facilities. This happened earlier this year after a BART police officer shot a homeless man. In the aftermath of that event, protest groups planned to descend upon the city to voice their concerns — and allegedly to disrupt BART services. As Roberts reports, the transit agency attempted to disrupt the protesters by cutting off their ability to communicate.

The FCC was concerned enough about this incident that it opened a notice of inquiry and sought public comments. BART officials justified their decision in part by claiming that the protests would put the public's safety at risk; indeed, according to Roberts, they claimed to have "credible information that the protesters planned lawless activities" that would put patrons at risk. This was no small concern, as BART is the fifth-busiest rapid-transit system in the country, averaging 375,000 riders each weekday. Meanwhile, opponents of the action claimed that it violated myriad First Amendment protections.

As a journalist, I am a staunch proponent of the First Amendment, which among other things guarantees the right to peacefully assemble. But I don't see this as a First Amendment issue as much as I see it as a public-safety issue — though not in the context established by BART.

BART officials claim that the safety of the public — and of the protestors — was at the forefront of their thinking. But I wonder how much thought they gave to expectant mothers who might have been riding that day. What if one of them went into labor on a BART platform and was unable to talk to her doctor because BART blocked the signal to her mobile phone? Let your imagination run wild for a moment or two — it won't take you long to dream up similar scenarios.

I can't help but wonder whether the decision was prompted more by financial concerns. It wouldn't be good for the bottom line if transit service was interrupted for a lengthy period. More to the point, if BART officials truly were concerned about what the protesters were going to do, it would have been much simpler and far less intrusive to deploy additional transit police. But that would have cost the agency tens of thousands of dollars.

Some argue that BART was within its legal rights because it didn't prevent commercial carriers from transmitting their signals; rather, it blocked patrons from receiving them. That strikes me as a specious distinction, akin to adhering to the letter of the law, but not its spirit.

I'd like to know more about the "credible information" about the protesters' planned "lawless activities." Who were the sources? And what were the activities? If the activities truly were serious, wouldn't BART have shut down its system and evacuated all of the stations? The fact that it didn't suggests that the threat was more benign. And the possibility of a protester jumping onto the tracks to keep trains from moving isn't enough to warrant the additional risks to the public's safety that BART unwittingly unleashed when it prevented its patrons from using their mobile communications devices.

What do you think? Tell us in the comment box below.

Tags: Transportation Commentary Critical Infrastructure Policy State & Local Government Wireless Networks Urgent Matters Commentary

Related


  • Some argue that BART was within its legal rights because it didn’t prevent commercial carriers from transmitting their signals; rather, it blocked patrons from receiving them. That strikes me as a specious distinction, akin to adhering to the letter of the law, but not its spirit.
  • Some argue that BART was within its legal rights because it didn’t prevent commercial carriers from transmitting their signals; rather, it blocked patrons from receiving them. That strikes me as a specious distinction, akin to adhering to the letter of the law, but not its spirit.
  • Some argue that BART was within its legal rights because it didn’t prevent commercial carriers from transmitting their signals; rather, it blocked patrons from receiving them. That strikes me as a specious distinction, akin to adhering to the letter of the law, but not its spirit.
  • Newscan: Single sign-in for government services expands to states, localities
    Newscan: Single sign-in for government services expands to states, localities
    Web Roundup Items from other news organizations Single sign-in for government services expands to states, localities Iowa taps into FirstNet for 911 backup Top Homeland Security senators want details on agencies hit in SolarWinds, Microsoft intrusions European institutions targeted in cyberattack last week FCC signals potential different outcome for net-neutrality remand 911: Past, present, more […]

Related Content

  • Digital-health infrastructure benefits from cloud-to-edge architecture
  • All actions monitored: The 10 most surveilled major cities in the U.S.
  • Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiator
  • Biden's $100 billion broadband plan raises four big questions

Commentary


Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiator

7th April 2021

Ransomware? Let’s call it what it really is: extortionware

21st February 2021

Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces

18th February 2021
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Satellites poised to join 5G network topology dlvr.it/Rxcw0s

14th April 2021
UrgentComm

Global dwell time drops as ransomware attacks accelerate dlvr.it/Rxcvzm

14th April 2021
UrgentComm

IoT enterprise deployments continue apace, despite COVID-19 dlvr.it/Rxcq8X

14th April 2021
UrgentComm

In this comprehensive report, @Omdia's @krehbehn delivers a landscape and forecast for LTE and #5G technology servi… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

13th April 2021
UrgentComm

New T-Band rules impact LMR licensing activity dlvr.it/RxbhVh

13th April 2021
UrgentComm

Nokia, Lenovo shake hands on patent deal dlvr.it/RxVjvh

12th April 2021
UrgentComm

Newscan: Single sign-in for government services expands to states, localities dlvr.it/RxLQNR

9th April 2021
UrgentComm

‘Life-saving technology’: AST SpaceMobile CEO outlines capabilities of direct-to-smartphone LEO satellite service dlvr.it/RxKqvp

9th April 2021

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X