https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

NTIA/FirstNet


News

FirstNet’s Johnson outlines legal issues surrounding PSAC

FirstNet’s Johnson outlines legal issues surrounding PSAC

Inability of FirstNet to communicate with the Public Safety Advisory Committee stems from non-disclosure agreements signed by the former, and the makeup of the latter.
  • Written by
  • 6th May 2013

FirstNet officials want to share all network-related information they have with members of the Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC), but legal issues are preventing this from happening at the moment, according to FirstNet board member Jeff Johnson.

As part of a controversial presentation during the FirstNet board meeting in April, FirstNet board member Paul Fitzgerald said that the PSAC has been “treated more like a necessary evil than a valuable source of public-safety advice,” and that there has been more than one “roadblock … put down” to limit the ability of the PSAC to be involved in a “meaningful way.”

Johnson said that the legal limitations can be traced to the fact that the PSAC consists of members of SAFECOM, a group that operates within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and consists largely of local-government representatives.

“The significance to that is, when you represent local government, by fact you don’t represent the federal government or FirstNet,” Johnson said during an interview with Urgent Communications. “So, that means that nondisclosure agreements that we may make with people that are trying to help us see the future and people who are trying to help us see the reality of manufacturing devices at a certain pace with a certain capability … only extend to FirstNet, the federal government and our agents, not to representatives of local governments.”

As a result, FirstNet board members cannot share information learned via nondisclosure agreements and other confidential sources with the PSAC members at the moment. This emerged as a source of frustration for all involved during a recent meeting between PSAC executive board members and the FirstNet engineering team that otherwise was very productive, Johnson said.

“There were elements that we couldn’t disclose to them, because of the elements that we have in front of us,” he said. “Fortunately, our legal team is trying to help us find a path through that, but some of this takes time, and it takes patience.”

FirstNet hopes to find a way to overcome this legal obstacle, Johnson said.

“This is the most important thing: We have been working for no less than 3 or 4 months trying to find a way where we can create access to them to see this information,” he said. “It’s in FirstNet’s best interest; it’s in the PSAC’s best interest; and, most importantly, it’s in the best interest of the public-safety community that they have visibility into this.”

When asked whether changes in the PSAC would have to be made if no legal solution to address the situation can be found, Johnson declined to comment on such speculation.

“I don’t want to go down this path of ‘What if we don’t?’” Johnson said. “I’m optimistic that we’re going to find a legal path to expose to at least some of the PSAP leadership the critical and important parts. But some of these things take time, and the legal process doesn’t move very quick sometimes. It’s challenging, but it’s important.”

In the meantime, FirstNet and the PSAC will work to communicate with each other as much as the law allows, Johnson said.

“We’re handling it by sharing everything we can legally share with the PSAC and seeking their counsel—that’s the best we can do today,” he said. “The PSAC wants it differently; FirstNet and our chairman want it differently, but we’ve got to work through the process.

“Here’s what isn’t tolerable for either of us. We cannot contaminate the outcome by breaching a process or something that is clearly evident in the statute. We just can’t go there—it’s not appropriate, and we don’t want to contaminate the outcome.”

Tags: News NTIA/FirstNet Policy News

Most Recent


  • Panel at SBC event examines significant economic, policy challenges facing in-building communications
    Ensuring that public safety can communicate while responding to emergencies inside buildings is a clear need, but identifying the proper solutions and making them affordable to building owners is a significant challenge, according to panelists exploring the topic during a recent Safer Buildings Coalition (SBC) event. Mike Baltrotsky, assistant chief and technology manager for Montgomery […]
  • Indoor 5G and how to solve it
    We all know the problem: mobile phone service is working fine … until you move indoors. Then, sometimes it works (you don’t notice), sometimes it sort of works (meh) and sometimes it clings on by one tiny bar or drops out entirely (argh). Diagnosing the problem is relatively simple. The loss of mobile service indoors […]
  • Honeywell releases cybersecurity, smart-building tools
    Honeywell has released a series of new tools aimed at improving operational efficiency and sustainability, including an operational technology (OT) cybersecurity tool and a smart building management system. The new cybersecurity tool, Cyber Insights, collects information from multiple OT data sources to identify vulnerabilities and threats.  “Organizations should leverage technology to address worker shortages, while […]
  • Small-cell focus still largely on densification, but private-network opportunity growing
    Some big ambitions for small cells were on display during the annual Small Cell World Summit in London this week. But it’s worth remembering that on the ground, their deployment is still at a relatively early stage. Dean Bubley of Disruptive Analysis, who chaired a panel addressing the issues of value creation and monetization, summarized […]

4 comments

  1. Avatar Sean Kirkendall 7th May 2013 @ 1:01 pm
    Reply

    More evidence that public
    More evidence that public safety and its representatives in the Public Safety Alliance, and many of whom are now within PSAC and FirstNet, did not get everything they wanted in the legislation or the law, despite what some have claimed. The governance under NTIA and the lack of independence from the Federal bureaucracy are but just two of the shortfalls that we tried to avoid, T-Band giveback and only “up to $7B” are two more, and the lack of any foreseeable funding for R&D and NG911 before FY2017 are yet two more. Oh, and let’s not forget the constraints on who can be users of the network on a day-to-day basis ,which will be decided by courts someday. Those are big deals holding back progress and undercutting the potential for success, and many believe put in place by design to constrain and limit FirstNet and its level of robustness and success in realizing a nationwide public safety broadband network. There are those who do not want to see FirstNet succeed, and certainly not if it jeopardizes their controlling interests. It is far past time for individuals and groups claiming to represent consumer interests start listening to public safety and start speaking up for consumers’ rights to have reliable emergency communications capabilities, which clearly the commercial cellular and wireless networks do not provide today! That starts with securing such resources and capabilities for first responders.

  2. Avatar Anonymous 8th May 2013 @ 4:04 am
    Reply

    Well it is easy to see why
    Well it is easy to see why interoperability fails in this country. The monies would be better spent at the state and local level solving LMR “operability” problems. The Interoperability problem is dependent upon local coverage and operability and cooperation between agencies who desire to cooperate. The “one system fits all” plan is doomed.

  3. Avatar Anonymous 8th May 2013 @ 2:18 pm
    Reply

    After 30 years of military,
    After 30 years of military, private sector, and government service in two-way radio communications, I agree with the comment that states could better spend the money and then accomodate the feds on each of their systems better than this Firstnet concept. How much money are we going to waste again before we realize we need more money to complete the job and it stalls out again? Get rid of the corporate egos and put the money where it can serve the people the best. It is like a broken record.

  4. Avatar Jim-M1-Radio 8th May 2013 @ 5:28 pm
    Reply

    This article is clear and
    This article is clear and succinct evidence that the motion presented by Sheriff Fitzgerald is well founded and appropriate, and also that his ideals and goals are definitely noble and correct. I applaud and support Sheriff Fitzgerald in his gallant exposure of the problems within FirstNet and his desire for support of Public Safety personnel.
    Additionally, may I point to this article as evidence that a large lethargic, single-minded (not public safety oriented), unfocused organization such as FirstNet seems to demonstrate that a large corporation (a Gov’t Authority is just that) is not appropriate for Public Safety. Rather a small, highly focused and motivated group which develops requirements, specifications, standards and regulations is far more applicable to public safety needs. May I also point out that the creation of unique devices (hand held tablets, pda, etc) by the embedded inclusion of specific features, protocols, capabilities, etc under the guise of “interoperability” is only going to raise the cost of thee devices and make communicating with Public Safety a unique exclusionary function. The thought of needing “interoperability” in the “LTE, 3g, 4g” realm is preposterous and blatantly exclusionary. First these devices cannot communication directly between each, communication must be established via a network switch (processor, databases, etc), therefor “interoperability” is not an issue, it is handled by the ‘network & switch’. Secondly “interoperability” is not a hardware issue, it is clearly a command procedural issue and rises well above the minutia details of hardware issues. FirstNet’s claim that “interoperability” needs to be implemented in the devices is exclusionary, diversionary and contra-productive to the needs of Public Safety.
    Again, thank you Sheriff Fitzgerald.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.