https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Urgent Matters


Commentary

Differences on ‘public-safety entity’ definition may be addressable by FirstNet

Differences on ‘public-safety entity’ definition may be addressable by FirstNet

In recent filings with FirstNet regarding the definition of a "public-safety entity" that would be eligible for priority-access consideration, commercial wireless carrier AT&T and utilities associations approach the matter very differently, but their final conclusions include a lot of similarities.
  • Written by Donny Jackson
  • 13th November 2014

Last week, we ran an article depicting the opposing positions taken by two public-safety groups—the National Public-Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) and the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO)—about the definition of a “public-safety entity” that would be eligible for priority access on the much-anticipated FirstNet broadband system.

In filings as part of the FirstNet public-notice proceeding to explore legal interpretations, NPSTC largely agreed with the FirstNet staff proposal that a “public-safety entity” should be considered broadly, which would allow utilities and other critical-infrastructure entities to be considered for priority access, depending on the circumstances associated with an incident.

In contrast, APCO—a key member of NPSTC—disagreed with this notion, stating that priority access should be limited only to those fitting the traditional definition of public safety: personnel representing law enforcement, fire and EMS.

Significant in the APCO response is that it got a couple of big points out in the open, noting that wireless commercial carriers played a large part in the lobbying effort to convince Congress to reallocate the 700 MHz D Block spectrum to public safety. Indeed, most Beltway sources I’ve spoken with over the years have indicated that the D Block reallocation and the FirstNet initiative would not have happened without the support that AT&T and Verizon provided on Capitol Hill.

The APCO filing also noted that the FirstNet’s mission “is providing an otherwise unobtainable service for first responders, not competing with wireless carriers.” Indeed, the notion of government competing with commercial business is always a touchy subject, with potentially significant legal, economic and policy implications.

“Major communications carriers supported public safety’s efforts in part because they intended their efforts to result in a network that serves first responders, and not, for example, other customers of their commercial services, such as individual consumers and utilities,” the APCO filing states. “The prohibition in the Act against offering services directly to consumers supports this view.”

However, if the prioritization assurance provided to a utility or other critical-infrastructure entity is limited to mission-critical functions—for example, monitoring that determines whether the power grid is up for an electric utility, not whether the utility can conduct automated meter reading—it’s questionable whether FirstNet really would be competing with commercial wireless carriers.

While utilities and other critical-infrastructure groups utilize commercial communications services, most are not comfortable putting communications to and from their most important system components on a “best effort” communications network—a fact noted by Wendell Little of Con Edison during a recent webinar about future communications options for utilities.

A joint response from the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) and the Utilities Telecom Council (UTC) recognizes this limited need for utility prioritization, noting that “utility mission-critical applications consume relatively low bandwidth and can be easily accommodated on the network without impacting other important public safety applications.”

In its filing, AT&T echoes the APCO interpretation, noting that “Congress intended to limit the scope of primary users—i.e., public safety entities—to traditional first responders: law enforcement, firemen, and EMS providers.”

On the surface, that sounds like a pretty big disagreement. But a couple of sentences later, AT&T indicates it would support some critical-infrastructure entities having priority access on the FirstNet system under certain circumstances.

“There may be some consumers, such as electric utilities and transportation departments, that need to access the network in the event of a crisis to support public-safety entities,”the AT&T filing states. “These consumers could have their communications dynamically prioritized to take advantage of the NPSBN [nationwide public-safety broadband network] in an emergency, according to their need.”

It’s possible that I’m missing a legal nuance, but it appears to me that the AT&T and UTC/EEI positions are not that different. The wireless carrier is saying that utility traffic should be allowed only on a secondary basis but can be prioritized in times of emergency. The utility groups are saying that their mission-critical traffic should be prioritized, but other traffic—the bulk of the bandwidth used by a utility—can operate on a secondary basis.

This might be slightly more significant than a “distinction without a difference,” as the old saying goes, but I do see a lot more similarities than disagreements in the AT&T and UTC/EEI responses.

The bottom line is that both sides indicate there are times when a utility or other critical-infrastructure entity should be eligible to have priority access on the FirstNet system, and there are many more cases when it is more appropriate to treat them as secondary users.

Given this, for certain application that are commercially important but have no clear public-safety value, it would not surprise me to see utilities and other critical-infrastructure groups opt to run them over commercial services rather than being treated as a secondary user on the FirstNet network.

Or, the critical-infrastructure entities might be willing to pay for the deployment of additional hardened sites—bandwidth capacity—in key locations (for instance, along power right of ways) to greatly reduce the chance that they would ever be preempted by public safety, because there would be enough capacity to serve all needs. Such a scenario would be a boon to public safety, because this likely would make the system more reliable and significantly enhance capacity.

While the positions stated in the AT&T and UTC/EEI responses certainly are not identical, they seem to be philosophically close enough that a workable agreement can be forged.

Tags: Legislation Regulation Transportation Utility Commentary Critical Infrastructure NTIA/FirstNet Policy Public Safety Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet Urgent Matters Commentary

Most Recent


  • Intelsat, OneWeb team on in-flight connectivity
    UK-government backed OneWeb and US-based Intelsat are joining forces to offer in-flight connectivity services to airlines, combining the former’s low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellite service with the latter’s geostationary (GEO) satellites to “harness the power of multi-orbit capabilities.” The companies said they expect the multi-orbit solution to be in service by 2024. Inflight connectivity is certainly an […]
  • Black Hat 2022: Adapting to the growing cyberthreat landscape
    The nation’s first cybersecurity chief is warning that the growing threat landscape will get worse as society and businesses become more digitized. At the Black Hat USA 2022 conference, Chris Krebs, the first director of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said he spent the last 18 months gathering information. He spoke to people […]
  • Diffusing the connected car's ticking data-privacy timebomb
    Connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) collate a significant amount of data to ensure vehicle safety, requiring an always-on internet connection and hundreds of sensors. An entire industry has been developed around monitoring, logging, analyzing and monetizing it. Yet, the danger is, particularly with increasing cyber-attacks, that this data could end up being leaked and stolen. […]
  • Patch madness: Vendor bug advisories are broken, so broken
    BLACK HAT USA – Las Vegas – Keeping up with security-vulnerability patching is challenging at best, but prioritizing which bugs to focus on has become more difficult than ever before, thanks to context-lacking CVSS scores, muddy vendor advisories, and incomplete fixes that leave admins with a false sense of security. That’s the argument that Brian […]

Related Content

Commentary


LTE and liability: Why the fire service must move forward with digital incident command

  • 2
6th May 2022

Partnership and collaboration must be the foundation for emergency communications

18th April 2022

FirstNet success means no hypothetical ‘shots’ need to be fired, Swenson says

22nd February 2022
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Intelsat, OneWeb team on in-flight connectivity dlvr.it/SWgYb2

15th August 2022
UrgentComm

Black Hat 2022: Adapting to the growing cyberthreat landscape dlvr.it/SWgF3Y

15th August 2022
UrgentComm

Diffusing the connected car’s ticking data-privacy timebomb dlvr.it/SWdCw2

14th August 2022
UrgentComm

Patch madness: Vendor bug advisories are broken, so broken dlvr.it/SWcvFR

14th August 2022
UrgentComm

What the 6 GHz band might mean to fixed-wireless access dlvr.it/SWctfk

14th August 2022
UrgentComm

FirstNet PTT technical progress highlighted by AT&T at APCO 2022 dlvr.it/SWZtNJ

13th August 2022
UrgentComm

Newscan: D.C. appeals court upholds FCC decision to share 5.9 GHz V2V spectrum with Wi-Fi dlvr.it/SWZQpx

13th August 2022
UrgentComm

Cisco confirms data breach, hacked files leaked dlvr.it/SWV8l9

12th August 2022

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X