https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

View From The Top


Commentary

FirstNet should leave ‘public-safety entity’ definition to governor of each state/territory

FirstNet should leave ‘public-safety entity’ definition to governor of each state/territory

In its third public notice, FirstNet seeks clarification on the definition of a "public-safety entity" that can be considered for priority access on its nationwide public-safety broadband network. How should we answer the question of “who is public safety/who gets a radio?” Let governors decide.
  • Written by
  • 29th May 2015

By Steve Kropper

“Who is public safety?” FirstNet is not asking a new question in its third public notice. It is the same as, “Who gets a radio?” In municipalities across the country these decisions are made every day at the local level. In disasters, state governors are empowered by statute to define “Who is public safety?”

The resulting answers vary greatly, as what might work in Alaska may fail in Hawaii. Rules for cities don’t fit rural America. It is unlikely that anybody in Washington can develop better policy whether chasing alligators, clearing snow, driving school buses, restoring power or inspecting dams defines public safety.

In the case of FirstNet, there are many compelling reasons to have as broad a definition as possible. Operating a cellular network is expensive and the more users contributing the more viable the network. Even commercial networks are challenged to reach a breakeven point, despite having large-scale customer bases.

Commercial rates are the price ceiling for FirstNet; otherwise states and agencies will vote with their dongles and opt out to stick with their current data carrier. Using $90 per month for carrier wireless broadband (based on state procurement schedules), T-Mobile's 50 million subscribers generate $4.5 billion monthly, or $54 billion annually. By comparison, Verizon Wireless' revenue is $120 billion annually.

If we assume there are 3 million public-safety subscribers that pay the same $90 per month, FirstNet's revenue could be $270 million per month, or $3 billion annually. Adding to the expense-side burden is that public-safety subscribers demand higher standards, more resilience and more coverage.

It is commonly suggested that the breakeven point for a facilities-based commercial network in the United States is about 45 million subscribers, or $48.6 billion in annual revenue.

In contrast, the estimated capital expenditure for a national network is between 5 and 10 times FirstNet’s $6.5 billion budget. Will the spectrum-lease earnings help the revenue picture? I am mindful of the D Block auction failure and doubtful about the game-changing magnitude of this option.

It is clear that FirstNet needs all the paying subscribers it can attract. So why debate who qualifies as a public-safety entity? First, the competing carriers may oppose broadening the public-safety-entity definition, because they don't want to cede to FirstNet those utility and non-emergency government users. Second, first responders are concerned about congestion on the network. Thankfully, FirstNet has included technical mechanisms to easily manage the congestion concerns with priority and preemption.

So, how should we answer the question of “who is public safety/who gets a radio?” Let governors decide.

Today, governors decide who is critical to public safety in disaster declarations and snow emergencies. Statutes guide their emergency proclamations on who are essential personnel. State (and local) control is one of many 'opt in' incentives needed to attract critical user mass. Considering the small public-safety customer base, we need all the opt-in incentives we can find. Let chiefs and sheriffs continue to manage the local level.

To be adopted by first responders, FirstNet can’t go backwards on any major capability of the existing LMR network—and local control is a major capability.  Public safety will whisper “Opt out” in the governor's ear, if they feel a loss of control.

Governors will delegate policy to big-city agencies, state police and policy groups—APCO, NPSTC, DHS and PSAC member agencies have resolved far more nettlesome questions. Further, FirstNet needs more than subscribers; it needs a broad political constituency. It needs to be THE state/local/ federal network for police, fire and EMS, plus connected school buses, snow plows, parking meters, and traffic lights.

Here are more reasons to delegate the decision to states:

  • At the state level, decisions are made dynamically close to the action. Local experience can quickly correct local policy. Federal rules would be inflexible.
  • Delegating to the states is not driven by any constitutional imperative like states' rights. “Who is public safety?” is not federalized today.  Nothing about FirstNet requires this to change except to guarantee access by Federal agencies.
  • Emulating Biblical scholars in parsing the legislation that created FirstNet and the Communications Act of 1934 to define public safety wastes precious time. Push the decision down close to users.

In conclusion, FirstNet should define any user class, approved by a governor, as a public-safety entity prior to issuing the final RFP.  After assuring priority and preemption for public safety, economic viability—not exclusion—should drive who has access.  Reaching the breakeven point impels FirstNet to define public safety broadly, then delegate details to the states.

Steve Kropper is a vice president at Parallel Wireless.

 

Tags: Commentary Funding NTIA/FirstNet Public Safety Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet View From The Top Commentary

Most Recent


  • FBI, CISA issue joint warning on 'Snatch' ransomware-as-a-service
    Cybersecurity advisories from the FBI and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) are usually a good indication that a particular threat merits priority attention from organizations in the crosshairs. That would appear to be the case with “Snatch,” a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operation that has been active since at least 2018 and is the […]
  • Huawei hacked by U.S., according to China spy agency
    It’s back to 2019 on Huawei, with the US and China exchanging barbs and the Chinese firm accused of skirting US export rules. China foreign affairs spokesperson Mao Ning Wednesday assailed the US for “overstretching” the concept of national security in order to discriminate against Chinese companies. She rejected a complaint by Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo over […]
  • Driverless-car crashes less frequent, cause less damage, according to insurance research
    Waymo is using insurance data to demonstrate that its self-driving taxis are safer than human-driven vehicles. The company, owned by Google parent Alphabet, has published research led by insurer Swiss Re that it says shows how driverless vehicles crash less frequently and do less damage than those piloted by humans. The study comes at a pivotal moment […]
  • Germany proposes strict curbs on Huawei
    Relying on a Russian thug for energy supplies no longer appeared very sensible to Germany’s government after Vladimir Putin sent Russian troops into Ukraine. Similar dependence by Germany’s telcos on Huawei has looked just as risky to opponents of the Chinese equipment vendor. If Putin could turn off the Nordstream gas taps in response to […]

Related Content

Commentary


Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023

Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.