FirstNet takes first step toward getting down to business
What is in this article?
FirstNet takes first step toward getting down to business
While this approach makes sense, it is not clear whether FirstNet has the legal right to take excess money from a state or territory that has chosen the “opt-out” alternative that Congress included in the law that created FirstNet. The public notice that seeks comment on this subject and others associated with the relationship between FirstNet and “opt-out” states or territories.
(Editor’s note: The “opt-out” term in the law is an unfortunate one, because many people—understandably—believe that it means a state has the right to opt out of public-safety broadband and FirstNet entirely. That is not the case. Even if a state chooses the “opt-out” alternative, it still must build a radio access network (RAN), connect to the FirstNet core network and meet FirstNet’s interoperability requirements. In the public notice, these “opt-out” states are referenced as “states that assume RAN responsibilities.” It’s a much more accurate description, but it is cumbersome. Someday, maybe we can agree on a shorter term that everyone understands, like “RAN states.” Until then, we’ll continue to use the “opt-out” term, because that is what people know today.)
If a “have” state can keep its revenues within the state, it would have a negative impact on FirstNet’s ability to provide broadband nationwide, according to FirstNet Chairwoman Sue Swenson.
“As we have said from the beginning, $7 billion will not deploy the nationwide network that public safety needs,” Swenson said during yesterday’s board meeting. “Most states will need the revenue generated by a few high-density states.”
Does FirstNet have the right to take excess revenue generated in an “opt-out” state to use elsewhere in the nation? If so, how is it determined what is excess revenue, as opposed revenue a state should keep to support its RAN network, including discretionary funds to handle unforeseen costs? Meanwhile, if FirstNet is going to get all excess revenue, is the “opt-out” alternative something states and territories really would want to consider?
These are just a few of the questions that need to be explored. It is debatable what the answers should be, but there is little doubt that the policy decisions will have a significant impact on FirstNet’s business mode, how bidders approach FirstNet’s final request for proposal (RFP), and the relationship between FirstNet and the states/territories.