https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Land Mobile Radio


Optimizing simulcast networks

  • Written by
  • 19th March 2013
They can be pricey, so here's how to get the most bang for the buck.

What is in this article?

  • Optimizing simulcast networks
  • More simulcast optimization steps

Optimizing simulcast networks

In the November 2008 issue of this magazine, we discussed simulcast networks and examined some common pitfalls of simulcast design. This month, we focus on some of the steps needed to optimize such networks.

Simulcast Basics

Simulcast is an abbreviation for simultaneous broadcast and, in the context of land mobile radio (LMR), it means simultaneous transmission from two or more repeater sites on precisely the same radio frequency and with the same modulation.

Simulcast networks offer several advantages:

  • Overlapping coverage without handoff complexity
  • Better trunking efficiency
  • Simpler operation, because no handoff is required between sites
  • Macro diversity improvement from voting receivers on the inbound path

Disadvantages include high cost and signal distortion in simulcast overlap regions. The high cost results from more complex timing and control hardware, as well as the simple fact that every site must be populated with one repeater for each frequency used in the network. In contrast, a multicast system incorporates a handoff algorithm to pick the site with the best signal, and the number of repeaters at each site is driven by traffic-engineering considerations to ensure a low blocking or queuing probability.

Because simulcast systems are pricey, the vendor may propose simulcast even when conditions don’t warrant it. The “better coverage” advantage often is oversold. True, seamless overlapping coverage is an advantage of simulcast, but multicast systems also have seamless overlapping coverage, if an effective handoff algorithm is used. The most compelling reason for choosing simulcast is not coverage improvement but to address a lack of frequencies. When frequencies are in short supply, simulcast is the right solution.

Elements of a Simulcast Network

Essential elements of a simulcast network are the repeater site (two or more), repeaters, antennas, multiplexer, voter comparator, accurate frequency reference, and interconnecting network. A notional block diagram of a simulcast network is shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1: Simulcast Network

The simulcast multiplexer performs an important function that is not obvious from its name: it introduces the relative baseband (audio) delay between sites to control time delay interference (TDI). Control of baseband delay and receiver voting are functions of the control station, which is often collocated with one of the repeater sites. The interconnecting network usually provides T-1 throughput via landlines or microwave links.

Early simulcast systems employed transmitters with custom-cut-and-matched crystal oscillators to ensure that each transmitter was operating on precisely the same frequency. The modern approach is to use specialized GPS receivers to train the transmitter’s reference oscillator (usually 10 MHz).

Linear Simulcast Modulation

The first parameter to be considered in the optimization process is the modulation used on the outbound path, where TDI can occur. We’ll assume that digital modulation is used on both the control channel and the traffic channels (e.g., Project 25, NXDN, DMR and TETRA). To minimize TDI, the modulation rate should be as low as possible, and the waveform should be tolerant of time-delay overlap (also known as intersymbol interference).

For example, a P25 Phase 1 system operates with C4FM modulation at a symbol rate of 4.8 ks/s and a bit rate of 9.6 kb/s (2 bits per symbol). The symbol period is 208 microseconds. The receiver only can tolerate delays equal to a fraction of this period, but the precise amount of delay it can tolerate depends on the amplitude of the interfering signal(s), the inherent tolerance of the waveform to delays, and the receiver implementation.

For P25 simulcast networks, some manufacturers employ proprietary versions of the alternative P25 Phase 1 modulation known as compatible quadrature phase shift keying (CQPSK). If implemented optimally in the receiver, CQPSK has better sensitivity than C4FM and, consequently, better in-building coverage and longer range.

So, why is it called “linear” simulcast modulation? Unlike C4FM, CQPSK is not continuous phase; therefore, it exhibits sharp spectral regrowth when used with a nonlinear class C amplifier. As a result, less-efficient linear amplifiers are required in the repeater. In contrast, C4FM is used in the battery-operated portable radio, where efficiency is paramount.

1 | 2 |
More simulcast optimization steps
Tags: Simulcast Land Mobile Radio System Design Article

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Public-safety coalition renews efforts to secure federal NG911 funding dlvr.it/ShwGfn

4th February 2023
UrgentComm

Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny dlvr.it/Shvpw3

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless dlvr.it/Shth0P

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them ‘verified’ Cloud Partner status dlvr.it/Shqngn

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Shapeshifting robot can morph from a liquid to a solid dlvr.it/Shqk9K

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Automakers against stampede to BEV dominance dlvr.it/ShpX08

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

FCC nominee Gigi Sohn headed for third Senate hearing dlvr.it/ShpDcZ

1st February 2023
UrgentComm

Sign up to learn how to successfully manage your Motorola ASTRO® 25 System: spr.ly/60143j8fp https://t.co/XcxiUwzN27

1st February 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.