https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • Product Guides
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Coverage/Interference


The best time to measure RF interference

  • Written by
  • 4th January 2013
Doing it at the wrong juncture will create a "world of hurt" for the system designer.

What is in this article?

  • The best time to measure RF interference
  • How to test

How to test

Testing for high-level signals can be as easy as using a spectrum analyzer and antenna at the proposed location. As with any test using a spectrum analyzer and an input from the environment, proper band-pass filtering is required. Ideally, you would use the same band-pass filtering that will be utilized in the final system design.

In general, any carriers in excess of -60 dBm* should be identified and provided to the manufacturer that is designing the receive preselector. They can then use that information to give you an accurate idea of what it would take to protect your receivers from those high-level carriers. In some cases, this may result in a significant redesign of the receive-preselector network.

Measuring noise levels can be a little trickier than measuring high-level signals. Because noise is often very low relative to signal strengths in the area, any spectrum analyzer used will require a low-noise amplifier and filtering capable of measuring signals as low as -130 dBm.* Unfortunately, this often can be difficult for systems with complex frequency plans that require sharp filtering. Crystal filters work well, but they are expensive and very frequency-limited.

However, testing also can be performed with a typical system receiver to provide an idea of what kind of degradation a system would experience. Called “effective receiver sensitivity,” this testing can be performed with a sample receive system — including an antenna, receive preselector and multicoupler, and a radio — a service monitor, an isolated tee and a way to measure sensitivity. Sensitivity is normally measured in terms of bit-error rate (BER) for digital systems or SINAD for analog systems.

FIGURE 2: ERS Testing SetupThe first step is to obtain the baseline (or static) sensitivity of the system. Place the isolated tee on the input or antenna for the receive preselector (Figure 2a). Then, inject a test signal from the service monitor into the antenna port of the isolated tee. The test signal is normally modulated by single tone for SINAD or a test pattern, such as V.52, for BER. Adjust the signal until you achieve either 5% BER or 12 dB SINAD. This signal level is your static sensitivity.

The next step is to characterize the isolated tee. This is done by placing a load on the antenna port of the isolated tee and injecting the test signal onto the isolated port (Figure 2b). Once again, adjust the signal to achieve either 5% BER or 12 dB SINAD. This is our static sensitivity through the isolated port.

The last step is to attach an antenna to the antenna port of the isolated tee (Figure 2c). The signal required to achieve 5% BER or 12 dB SINAD through the isolated port likely will be higher than in the previous step. Assuming that the static-sensitivity measurement is close to what the final system will have, the difference in signal level between the second and third tests will represent the degradation caused by the external environment, and this difference can be subtracted from the static measurement in step one to obtain the effective receiver sensitivity (ERS).

Testing a site for both signal and noise interference before installation is like an insurance policy. It identifies external interference that may make it impossible for the system to perform as well as planned. Spending the extra time up front is worth it. Waiting until after design and installation to find out whether there’s a potentially crippling level of interference is a risky prospect. A little bit of time and effort spent to measure external interference before installation could prevent a world of hurt from an inoperable system.

Noise is unpredictable. We’ve performed noise readings at hundreds of sites in all of the LMR bands and, while we have a general idea of what to expect, there still doesn’t appear to be a solid figure that can be used for any given band. Without actual measurement, the best that can be done is to use a conservative estimate for noise levels that likely will not be exceeded.

In environments where the noise is lower than this conservative estimate, system designs may be overly complex and expensive. On the other hand, under-compensating for noise can lead to failed coverage tests and the need to add more sites. Isn’t it better just to know?

Bill Tobin works for Bird Technologies as an RF engineer for the Site Optimization Services group. He has more than seven years of experience solving on-site RF issues.

The best time to measure RF interference
1 | 2 |
Tags: Bird Technologies Coverage/Interference Test & Measurement Article

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

Commentary


How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023

3GPP moves Release 18 freeze date to March 2024

18th January 2023

Do smart cities make safer cities?

  • 1
6th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Public-safety coalition renews efforts to secure federal NG911 funding dlvr.it/ShwGfn

4th February 2023
UrgentComm

Newscan: Cyberattacks on DoE national labs draw lawmaker scrutiny dlvr.it/Shvpw3

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

The shine begins to wear off 5G private wireless dlvr.it/Shth0P

3rd February 2023
UrgentComm

Phishers trick Microsoft into granting them ‘verified’ Cloud Partner status dlvr.it/Shqngn

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Shapeshifting robot can morph from a liquid to a solid dlvr.it/Shqk9K

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

Automakers against stampede to BEV dominance dlvr.it/ShpX08

2nd February 2023
UrgentComm

FCC nominee Gigi Sohn headed for third Senate hearing dlvr.it/ShpDcZ

1st February 2023
UrgentComm

Sign up to learn how to successfully manage your Motorola ASTRO® 25 System: spr.ly/60143j8fp https://t.co/XcxiUwzN27

1st February 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.