https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


Selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems

Selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems

Selecting antennas for a PCS or DCS system may be the most important decision an RF engineer makes. There are several points, including electrical issues,
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st July 1997

Selecting antennas for a PCS or DCS system may be the most important decision an RF engineer makes. There are several points, including electrical issues, for the engineer to consider, and attention to detail is key.

Many personal communications service (PCS) and digital cellular service (DCS) systems are being designed and optimized around the world. With system performance on the line, selecting antennas for a PCS or DCS system can be the most important decision an RF engineer makes. The antennas may represent only 1% to 3% of the total cost of a typical site, but they can have a big effect on performance. In fact, using a “dollar/performance” criterion, antennas can achieve the “most bang for the buck” of any system component. With this in mind, it is important to consider several points when selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems.

Several electrical issues can significantly affect overall system performance. Horizontal and vertical beamwidths define antenna gain. Horizontal beamwidths typically used on PCS and DCS systems are 338, 658, 908 and 1208. Each has its proper application. Horizontal beamwidths at 1208 are typically used by engineers who subscribe to the design theory developed during the early days of cellular. The conventional wisdom currently accepted is that 908 horizontal beamwidth antennas perform better in digital systems.

By using 908, or even narrower antennas, excessive overlap is avoided as shown in Figure 1 below. This excessive overlap can cause higher bit-error rates (BERs) in digital systems and capacity loss because of excess soft hand-off zones in code-division, multiple-access (CDMA) systems. By using 908 or narrower horizontal beamwidth sector antennas, operators can also help reduce the possibility of capturing mobiles from adjacent sectors, thus optimizing hand-offs. For PCS and DCS systems, most operators use 908 horizontal beamwidth antennas in rural and suburban sites.

For core urban sites, some operators use 658 horizontal beamwidth antennas. The 338 beamwidth antennas can be used for special bidirectional “corridor” applications. By mounting two high-gain, 338 horizontal beamwidth antennas back-to-back and then feeding them through a two-way coaxial power divider, a high-gain, bidirectional pattern is created. This pattern is ideal for covering long interstate highway corridors.

When the antennas are combined with a power divider, however, the energy is defocused, thus decreasing the gain by 3dB. To maintain maximum gain, the antennas should be fed separately, with the RF channels split between the two. An example of a bidirectional array for corridor coverage is shown in Figure 2 below. The front-to-back ratio (F/B) is also an important aspect of the horizontal beamwidth. The F/B typically varies between 20dB and 45dB, depending on the model and manufacturer. Log periodic dipole array antennas usually have a higher F/B than panel antennas. The highest F/B available on the market today is 45dB, which is useful for rejecting co-channel and adjacent channel interference. Not only should you look at the front-to-back specification, but the overall reduction of signal toward the back of the antenna. The horizontal pattern of an antenna with a F/B of 45dB is shown in Figure 3 above.

Once a horizontal beamwidth is chosen, the next step is to determine the proper vertical beamwidth. Vertical beamwidth, horizontal beamwidth and antenna efficiency define the overall gain. PCS and DCS antennas are typically available in lengths from one foot to six feet. A six-foot-tall PCS-DCS antenna has a vertical beamwidth of about 48. This is about as narrow a vertical beamwidth as should be used in a PCS or DCS system. A PCS antenna with a 658 horizontal beamwidth and a 78 vertical beamwidth should have a gain of about 16dBd. An antenna with these characteristics is shown in Photo 1 on page 12. Two PCS-DCS antennas with the same beamwidths should have about the same gain, provided they have reasonable antenna efficiency. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Most operators use antennas between four feet and six feet in length for rural and suburban sites. For urban sites, antennas from one to four feet long are being used, depending on the particular application. The vertical pattern also defines the amount of null-fill available. Null-fill can be useful for improving coverage close to the site, particularly for low-power portables. An antenna with good null-fill can be seen in Figure 4 on page 12.

Downtilt is another issue that RF engineers often discuss when designing and optimizing PCS and DCS antenna systems. Downtilt focuses below the horizon. (See Figure 5 at the left.) First, because PCS and DCS systems reuse frequencies, controlling the level of signal on the horizon is important. By tilting the main beam below the horizon, less co-channel interference occurs at the site that reuses the same frequency. Second, focusing the signal below the horizon can help to improve close-in coverage. When designing a system, the operator must be careful to consider both issues when choosing the best amount of downtilt at each specific site. Some operators use a fixed value at every site, say 108. This type of thinking can get the designer into trouble quickly. Every site has a specific height above average terrain (HAAT), desired coverage area and reduction of signal on the horizon. By using the equations in Figure 5, an RF engineer can more intelligently choose an initial value of downtilt for a particular site. Operators should be cautious of companies offering solutions with a selection of signal reduction on the horizon, such as 3dB, 6dB and 12dB down. This type of solution does not consider the necessary coverage area, nor does it offer the optimized solution for each site. Once the optimal value of downtilt has been chosen, the RF engineer must decide among mechanical tilt, electrical tilt, or a combination. Mechanical tilt is achieved with a mechanical downtilt bracket designed for the antenna. Electrical tilt is designed into the antenna, and the operator purchases the antenna with a fixed value of tilt. Figure 6 above shows the H-plane pattern on the horizon for an eight-element array with a 908 horizontal beamwidth mechanically tilted 28, 48, 68, 88 and 108. As can be seen, with 108 of tilt, the horizontal beamwidth on the horizon is considerably distorted by mechanical tilt. However, the patterns with 48 of mechanical tilt show that with a reasonable amount of tilt, say 48 for an eight-element array, there is no significant difference between mechanical and electrical tilt. The H-plane cut at the angle of mechanical tilt has the same pattern as the antenna without mechanical tilt. It is for this reason that mechanical tilt makes so much sense for reasonable values of downtilt. As long as no more than 108 of mechanical tilt on a four-element array, 48 to 58 on a eight-element array and 28 to 38 on a 12-element array are used, there is no significant distortion of the horizontal pattern, and the mechanical tilt allows for optimization of tilt in the field. If electrical tilt is required because of the amount of tilt needed, it may be wise to use a combination of electrical and mechanical tilt. The mechanical tilt bracket allows for easy adjustment of the tilt during the site optimization stage.

Last, but not least, among electrical issues to consider when choosing PCS and DCS antennas is voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR or return loss). Many operators choose antennas based on VSWR, but one must be careful when assuming that low VSWR means high quality. Back in the CB radio days, there was a company “X” that manufactured a high-quality 5/8-wave mobile antenna. This antenna had a VSWR of about 1.5:1. A new manufacturer, company “Y,” developed a 5/8-wave mobile antenna with a VSWR of 1.2:1. However, the low VSWR was achieved with a lossy coil. The antenna’s overall gain was lower than the antenna from company “X,” as can be seen in Figure 7 on page 16. Unfortunately, company “Y” took over the market with the antenna with less gain only because it had a better VSWR. Another way to view this situation is to imagine that every site in the system has an antenna VSWR of 1.5:1. The director of engineering comes to you on Friday afternoon and says, “Every site better have a 1.3:1 VSWR by Monday morning, or else.” One easy way out is to go to an electronics store and buy a couple hundred 3dB loss pads. Install one on the output of every antenna over the weekend and, voil , every antenna has a VSWR of about 1.22:1, and you never need to find out what “or else” means. Of course, there is one problem. Every antenna has its gain reduced by 3dB. The moral of the story is that lossy materials in an antenna will give the antenna a better VSWR, but they will also reduce gain and system performance.

When PC board antennas are used at 1.9GHz, a similar situation arises. If you measure a PC board antenna for VSWR, it looks great, but try to measure one on an antenna range for gain, and you will typically find that they do not have the gain you would expect for the vertical aperture of the array. When selecting antennas, it is wise to have the antennas measured on an antenna range for gain and patterns. This should preferably be done all on the same day and with one of your engineers as a witness. (It is amazing how a laptop can improve digitized patterns.) Many of the PCS-DCS antennas on the market do not meet advertised gain specifications. Although a half dB is not worth quibbling over, some of these products are overrated by 2dB, or even 3dB. The only way to protect yourself is to verify advertised antenna gains on an antenna test range.

Along with these electrical issues, it is just as important to consider mechanical issues. Catastrophic antenna system failures usually can be traced to poor mechanical antenna design. By looking for a few key features, you can help to protect yourself from these catastrophic failures. A key ingredient in successfully designing PCS and DCS antennas is to use the proper materials. Table 1 on page 18 shows compatible couples. Using this table, engineers can determine which metals can be placed in contact with other metals without causing galvanic corrosion. Galvanic corrosion can lead to intermod (IM) over time.

Another issue with the mechanical design of antennas is the large number of cables and solder joints used in certain designs. These soldered joints can be difficult to control and may break down over time, or may leave the factory in less-than-perfect condition. Although an antenna with numerous soldered joints may have no intermod when it is tested at the factory, operators have to be concerned with how it performs over the long term. One way to avoid this problem is to avoid cables and soldered joints completely. Although this is not always possible, sometimes a third construction technique can be used. By using a “monolithic” construction, the reliability of an antenna can be greatly increased. Photo 2 on page 22 shows an antenna constructed with this type of new technology. By eliminating cables and soldered joints, this monolithic technology improves the probability that an antenna will function reliably over the long term. If an antenna’s chance of failure is statistically related to the number of soldered joints, eliminating all of the joints should dramatically reduce the number of catastrophic failures in the field. The monolithic design also has an added benefit that the feed lines use air as a dielectric, which helps to reduce loss.

Another key mechanical aspect of an antenna is the connector. Most PCS and DCS operators are using 7/16 DIN connectors. They use these connectors on antennas for their good intermodulation specifications and durability during installation. Another aspect for RF engineers to consider when selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems is environmental testing such as IEC (International Electro Technical) testing. Table 2 on page 22 shows the minimal IEC testing a manufacturer should perform on an antenna design. When discussing IEC testing with your antenna vendor, be sure to ask for a copy of the results. You should receive a description of each test along with final VSWR, patterns and IM test results after all the tests have been completed.

A new development in antennas is polarization diversity antennas. Cellular and PCS systems use a concept known as space diversity reception to improve uplink performance and to help balance the uplink and downlink paths. Space diversity works under the assumption that an antenna spaced 10l horizontally from another antenna will not manifest signal fading identical with that of the first antenna. With a diversity receiver combiner that can use both antennas, the average uplink signal is improved between 4dB and 8dB, depending on conditions (and whose textbook you read). Polarization diversity is based on the assumption that the signal arriving from a portable phone in a multipath environment will exhibit random and changing polarization at the base site. By using an antenna that has elements in +458 and 2458 polarizations, the signals can be fed into a diversity combiner, and the average signal can be improved. This polarization diversity technique has been shown to be basically equivalent to space diversity schemes in urban and heavy urban environments with a lot of multipath. An operator considering polarization diversity needs to keep two important points in mind: First, polarization diversity only works for portables in high-multipath environments. This technique may not work well in suburban and rural areas with little multipath. Second, polarization diversity generally uses two input antennas, which requires duplexing the transmitters with one of the receiver outputs. Many of the PCS-DCS polarization diversity antennas exhibit poor IM performance. When checking IM on some of these antennas, I have seen some third-order products reach 260dBm to 280dBm with two 20W inputs. I have even seen this level on some standard, vertically polarized PCS antennas. Even the fifth-order levels on these antennas would cause serious noise problems and call quality degradation once a system is loaded. Any operator considering polarization diversity antennas, or any antenna to be used in a duplexed system, should ensure that the antennas exhibit excellent IM performance. One method of testing the IM performance of a particular design is to obtain several samples and test them at an IM test facility. Because most PCS-DCS carriers will only see fifth-order hits, a third-order level of 2100dBm with two 20W inputs should be the minimum acceptable level.

An RF engineer can often ascertain a lot about an antenna design by looking at the little details. Do the downtilt clamps that came with your antenna look as though your child made them from an erector set? How will they hold up in a 100mph wind? What about a 125mph wind? Does the antenna have a drain hole? Has the antenna been opened to examine internal construction and workmanship? Have you performed the “jump” test on the antenna? Additionally, keep in mind that it can pay to spend a few more dollars and make sure you are purchasing high quality, reliable antennas for your PCS or DCS system.

The author would like to hear how your PCS-DCS antennas have been performing and about any experiments being conducted.

Tags: content

Most Recent


  • Selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems
    Newscan: Securing the Internet of Things is quite a challenge
    Also: EWA requests dismissal of 900 MHz applications; TIA names tech and policy priorities for 2014; IJIS Institute names Shumate Award winner; App makes bus waits more tolerable; a Blackberry comeback may be in the offing.
  • Selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems
    Newscan: FCC certifies Carlson Wireless's white-space radio
    Also: Congress looks to revamp telecom law; Obama to place some restraints on surveillance; IEEE to study spectrum-occupancy sensing for white-spaces broadband; Major Swedish transport operator opts for Sepura TETRA radios; RFMD to partner on $70 million next-generation power grid project; NENA opens registratiuon for "911 Goes to Washington."
  • Selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems
    Newscan: A look at the critical job of 911 dispatchers
    Also: NYC launches website for tracking 911 response times; Oregon implements 911 on pre-paid cell phones; LightSquared wants to keep spectrum assets; Harris receives multiple government orders; FCC extends rebanding financial reconciliation deadline; Zetron gear at core of communications system upgrade; Ritron debuts wireless access control system; EWA seeks policy review of VHF vehicular repeater system deployments.
  • Selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems
    Newscan: Average peak data rates of 144 MB/s average realized in tests with CAT 4 LTE device
    Also: Verizon, T-Mobile to swap unused spectrum to improve coverage; Internet giants oppose surveillance--but only when the government does it; FCC Chairman says incentive auction will be delayed until middle of 2015; FCC chair announces staff appointments; Alcatel-Lucent names Tim Krause as chief marketing officer; New Jersey county deploys TriTech CAD system; Toronto airport deploys 26-position Zetron console system;

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision
  • Photo gallery: 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson
  • Selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems
    Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
  • Selecting antennas for PCS and DCS systems
    RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

How AT&T won DFW Airport’s $10 million private 5G business dlvr.it/Spj4Pt

27th May 2023
UrgentComm

Russia’s war in Ukraine shows cyberattacks can be war crimes dlvr.it/Spj3c2

27th May 2023
UrgentComm

FCC grants 700 MHz Band 14 license renewal to FirstNet Authority dlvr.it/Spj2Ny

27th May 2023
UrgentComm

Broadband for Critical Communications Everywhere Providing Connectivity When Seconds Count dlvr.it/Sph602

26th May 2023
UrgentComm

How vehicle insurance and autonomy intertwined dlvr.it/SpglBb

26th May 2023
UrgentComm

World’s least-expensive self-driving vehicle revealed dlvr.it/Spgc88

26th May 2023
UrgentComm

Voice calling is finally making its way onto 5G dlvr.it/SpdtYW

26th May 2023
UrgentComm

With many cities facing a fiscal cliff as ARPA funding ends, debt ceiling debate continues on Capitol Hill dlvr.it/Spdsnq

26th May 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.