https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


You started it!

You started it!

I've got a wry smile on my face as I bang out this month's column. The topic for this month is, "Who's the carrier, anyhow?" or "Who's serving whom?"
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st August 1997

I’ve got a wry smile on my face as I bang out this month’s column. The topic for this month is, “Who’s the carrier, anyhow?” or “Who’s serving whom?” The players in this political opera are a star-studded line-up that includes none other than Southwestern Bell Telephone (SWBT) and its list of accounts receivable.

Here’s the story. On April 25, 1997, SWBT sent a letter to Regina Keeney, chief of the FCC’s Common Carrier Bureau. In its letter, Southwestern Bell asked Chief Keeney whether the FCC would mind if the phone company collected some overdue bills from a few paging business customers that included AT&T, AirTouch Paging, PageNet and some other luminaries. It seems that some of SWBT’s largest customers were refusing to pay for the phone service used to terminate paging traffic.

In a later letter responding to Southwestern Bell’s earlier correspondence, the parsimonious paging companies explained why they were ducking SWBT’s collection department. They pointed out that in 1996 Congress changed the language of the Telecommunications Act, and, in Section 251(b)(5), the Act now says that local exchange carriers (LECs) are prohibited from charging commercial carriers for terminating traffic that originates on the LECs’ networks.

Southwestern Bell has argued that it is not attempting to charge for the traffic, it is only trying to recover costs for the “facilities” to carry the traffic to the paging companies.

Huh?

Oh, I’ve got it. That’s like the cable television company telling you that it’s not charging you for HBO, it’s just charging you for the use of the satellite downlink that just happens to carry HBO. The fact that the rate is the same as if you were paying for HBO is just a coincidence that could be easily cleared up_if you could just see it correctly.

The issues surrounding this little tiff between industry behemoths get extremely philosophical and esoteric: If a person picks up a phone and dials a pager number, who is being served and by whom? Because I majored in Zen and diesel mechanics at Harvey’s School For Frustrated Journalists, I’ll take a shot at this one.

When the customer, let’s call him Mortimer, picks up the phone, he’s placing an order with the phone company. He has dialed a number, and the phone company has guaranteed Mortimer that his call will be routed through its wires and switches to some unit that is connected to the phone system for receiving the call. The call might go to Mortimer’s mom’s telephone set, Don Imus’ fax machine, the psychic hotline or a paging terminal.

Assuming that the order is successful, Mortimer’s call will be received, and communication of some sort will happen. According to the Telecommunications Act, if Mortimer’s call is routed to a commercial carrier of communications, say “Acme Paging,” the phone company is prohibited from charging Mortimer and Acme Paging. Mort picks up the tab as a part of his phone service.

Congress seems to think that this arrangement is fair because it’s the phone company’s customer that initiated the request for service. The paging customer didn’t ask Mort to call. (Come to think of it, if a call goes to [instead of from] a cellular customer, that cellular customer didn’t ask for that particular service either. Hmmm.) In a nutshell, Congress said that if your customer is the one demanding service, you can’t charge other carriers for your use of their system to meet that demand.

This use of commercial logic is a radical departure by regulators from their long history of ignoring the basic tenets of contract law. In fact, it’s incredible! When you provide service to a customer, you expect that you will have to pay all suppliers that create the necessary inventory of goods and services to fulfill the demand. You pay the telephone company, the electric company, the site lessor and a host of other people to deliver services to your customers. Only the phone company was allowed to charge its customer, Mort, and the commercial supplier of the service that Mort demanded.

At the core of this dilemma was the government’s attempts to open up greater competition between LECs. The idea was that one LEC wouldn’t charge another when the traffic originated on the first LEC’s system. Or, as we used to say on the playground, “You started it!” But the ramifications of the statute could reach far beyond the competitive machinations of regional Bell operating companies (RBOCs) and other wireline carriers.

Consider the effect on paging, commercial microwave, fiber-optic systems, LANs, interconnected private carriers, cellular, PCS, ESMR and more. If the carrier of a particular wireless service is deemed commercial, then the telephone company is not supposed to charge for terminating the call with the commercial carrier. In fact, the issue arises as to whether the commercial carrier could charge the telephone company. This question is far from frivolous, and it is being discussed before the California Public Utilities Commission.

It is conceivable that telephone numbers used by paging and other wireless companies could become toll calls to offset the cost to telephone companies of using the wireless carrier’s system to satisfy the demand of the telephone companies’ customers. Someday, PageNet and AirTouch could be writing letters to the FCC to complain about the fact that an RBOC had failed to pay its bill to the paging company, instead of the other way around.

The FCC has shown its courage in dealing with this situation by asking for comments on the subject. I expect that it will get a bunch of comments from both paging companies and telephone companies that are trying to protect their respective turfs. It might also get a few whispers from other commercial carriers who are aware of the kind of advantage that a favorable ruling on behalf of wireless carriers might reap.

Meanwhile, here’s my scheme. I’m going to file a tariff with the local public utility commission to turn my customer premises equipment into a commercial entity that passes traffic to the extension in my den. Then I’m going to let it be known to every charity, aluminum siding salesman, real estate agent, lawn service company, religious cult and long-distance telephone company that I’d be happy to talk to them about their terrific products and services. Just to make sure that the phone keeps ringing, I’m going to run newspaper ads that suggest that a woman named Lola LaFlame will be waiting in my den to take calls. I figure I’ll be able to send the telephone company charges that almost keep up with the weekly increases in my cable bill.

Following up… I got a call the other day from a Nextel employee who works in the corporate communications office. He said that he had read my column regarding the company’s difficulty in obtaining profitability (June MRT), which caused him to laugh off an important body part. According to him, the company was doing better than expected and had announced that it would likely move out of the red in the third quarter of 1998.

After congratulating him on the company’s improved performance, I asked whether the predictions take into account interest payments that kick in at that time (to the tune of about $50 million per year, based on Nextel’s existing long-term debt of over $3 billion). I didn’t really get an answer to that question.

Instead, he predicted that I would have to “eat crow” about my comments about Nextel’s financial struggle. I assured him that if Nextel’s performance is as good as predicted, I’ll be happy to consume, in public, a bit of the noxious bird. Bring on the black, beaked entr,e and I’ll happily chew a tune of “I’m Sorry,” complete with Brenda Lee hairdo. Now, what’s he going to do if I’m right?

Schwaninger, MRT’s regulatory consultant, is a partner in the law firm of Brown and Schwaninger, Washington, DC. He is a member of the Radio Club of America.

Tags: content

Most Recent


  • You started it!
    Newscan: Securing the Internet of Things is quite a challenge
    Also: EWA requests dismissal of 900 MHz applications; TIA names tech and policy priorities for 2014; IJIS Institute names Shumate Award winner; App makes bus waits more tolerable; a Blackberry comeback may be in the offing.
  • You started it!
    Newscan: FCC certifies Carlson Wireless's white-space radio
    Also: Congress looks to revamp telecom law; Obama to place some restraints on surveillance; IEEE to study spectrum-occupancy sensing for white-spaces broadband; Major Swedish transport operator opts for Sepura TETRA radios; RFMD to partner on $70 million next-generation power grid project; NENA opens registratiuon for "911 Goes to Washington."
  • You started it!
    Newscan: A look at the critical job of 911 dispatchers
    Also: NYC launches website for tracking 911 response times; Oregon implements 911 on pre-paid cell phones; LightSquared wants to keep spectrum assets; Harris receives multiple government orders; FCC extends rebanding financial reconciliation deadline; Zetron gear at core of communications system upgrade; Ritron debuts wireless access control system; EWA seeks policy review of VHF vehicular repeater system deployments.
  • You started it!
    Newscan: Average peak data rates of 144 MB/s average realized in tests with CAT 4 LTE device
    Also: Verizon, T-Mobile to swap unused spectrum to improve coverage; Internet giants oppose surveillance--but only when the government does it; FCC Chairman says incentive auction will be delayed until middle of 2015; FCC chair announces staff appointments; Alcatel-Lucent names Tim Krause as chief marketing officer; New Jersey county deploys TriTech CAD system; Toronto airport deploys 26-position Zetron console system;

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision
  • Photo gallery: 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson
  • You started it!
    Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
  • You started it!
    RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

AT&T claims LTE coverage edge, FirstNet build more than 99% done dlvr.it/SlXZfr

27th March 2023
UrgentComm

Verizon Frontline supports U.S. Forest Service efforts against wildfires dlvr.it/SlX1g3

27th March 2023
UrgentComm

Autonomous-vehicle consequences could include more traffic dlvr.it/SlWr67

27th March 2023
UrgentComm

Tesla Model 3 hacked in less than 2 minutes at Pwn2Own contest dlvr.it/SlVJg9

26th March 2023
UrgentComm

SES: JP Hemingway on satellites’ role in the digital divide, D2D and disasters dlvr.it/SlTL4h

25th March 2023
UrgentComm

House members introduce $15 billion NG911 funding bill dlvr.it/SlS0Lr

25th March 2023
UrgentComm

ADRF: Sun Kim discusses company’s new hybrid in-building wireless solution dlvr.it/SlRtSQ

25th March 2023
UrgentComm

U.S. cell towers and small cells: By the numbers dlvr.it/SlRn6N

25th March 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.