https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


Electromagnetic compatibility vs. mobile radio installations

Electromagnetic compatibility vs. mobile radio installations

With the proliferation of digital electronic control devices or electronic control units (ECU) within vehicles, the problem of electromagnetic compatibility
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st May 1998

With the proliferation of digital electronic control devices or electronic control units (ECU) within vehicles, the problem of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) has really come to the forefront. How can all of these devices peacefully coexist within the confined space of vehicles? Now, throw in the mobile radio, with its relatively high RF power output and sensitive receivers, with an ever-increasing number of channels and range of operating frequencies, and the problem really gets complicated!

The problem is really a two-way (no pun intended) problem. That is, the radio transmitter can cause mild-to-severe degradation of the on-board electronics that control such things as ignition, braking and transmissions. Conversely, the ECUs might cause severe degradation to the mobile receiver. I remember a time when the communications technician only had to worry about a thing called ignition noise. And this only occurred at VHF low-band frequencies-right? Wrong. Contrary to some writings, the ignition noise problem could be severe at VHF high-band frequencies. Now that we have a multitude of other noise sources to concern us, the old ignition-noise problem pales in comparison.

Electronic ignition systems I remember my first encounter with the problem of the mobile radio transmitter interfering with the ECU that controls the ignition system of a pickup truck. The complaint was: “The engine stalls when I key the transmitter.” It was one of those unusually cold January days in upstate South Carolina when I had to go out and check this problem. Like everything else that slows down in cold weather, my brain seemed to be no exception.

Anytime I have to deal with intra-vehicular interference, one of my first objectives is to determine whether the interference is conducted or radiated. It is important to make this determination because this factor determines how the problem is going to be attacked and, one hopes, solved. Radiated interference means that the interference is entering or leaving the radio antenna. Conducted interference means that the interference is entering or leaving via cables, usually the power leads.

My first test was to confirm the complaint, just to satisfy myself that the problem did exist. So, I cranked the truck and keyed the mobile radio transmitter. To my chagrin the truck engine immediately shut down. This radio had been installed a couple of years ago by another technician and apparently had worked well for some time before this problem appeared.

Next, I removed the antenna connector from the radio and connected a dummy load instead. Again, I cranked the truck and keyed the transmitter. This time nothing happened-the truck ran on without skipping a beat. So, this interference was of the radiated type. The next step was to check the antenna. The forward-reflected power ratio looked good. The antenna was installed on the truck fender, next to the hood, so I raised the hood of the truck to explore underneath. I discovered that the antenna was sitting adjacent to the ECU that controls the ignition.

After this discovery, I suspected that the problem was the proximity of the antenna to the ignition ECU. Relocation of the antenna might solve the problem, but why had the problem just started when the installation had been working fine for some time? I quizzed the customer about the timing of the problem. Had anything been changed recently? Exactly when did the problem start? At first the customer expressed no knowledge of any changes around the time the problem started. But when asked specifically about the ECU he suddenly remembered that the ECU had been changed because of an ignition problem. Sure enough, that had been about the time the problem started with the radio.

The replacement ECU was apparently different from the original manufacturer’s part. At this point, it appeared that the problem might best be solved by relocating the antenna to a point further away from the ECU. However, before spending more time in that miserable cold, I decided to try a cheap trick on a hunch. Using a piece of regular kitchen aluminum foil, I carefully wrapped all the wires entering the ECU. Then, to test the results, I cranked the truck and keyed the transmitter. To my delight, the truck ran on.

Transmission ECU Recently, a problem was discovered in an International truck that is used to transport a crawler tractor used for forest fire suppression. The complaint was that something on the truck was interfering with normal radio reception on our state two-way radio receiver. The transceiver is a 32-channel VHF high-band with frequencies ranging from 151MHz to 159MHz. The interference was more severe on some channels than on others.

The first step in trying to resolve the problem was to determine the source of the interfering signal. The first possibility to come to mind was the ECU that controlled the engine. In order to search out the source of the interference, a Tektronix 495P spectrum analyzer was used with a sniffer probe attached, and a preamplifier was connected between the spectrum analyzer input and the sniffer probe as shown in Figure 1 on page 8. The sniffer probe is made by winding several turns of enameled wire into a self-supporting coil and attaching it to an SO239 connector as shown in Figure 2 on page 8. The preamplifier was a Radio Shack model used for CATV-not exactly a low-noise amplifier-but considering the noise figure of a spectrum analyzer, the amplifier was of sufficient quality for such work. With about 20dB of gain, the amplifier would allow us to see signals on the spectrum analyzer that normally would not be seen.

Using this test arrangement, a couple of mechanics, our communications technician and I set out to find the source of interference. First, the ECU that controls the engine was checked and found to be clean. At that point we did not realize that there was another ECU on board. Eventually, during the searching process, the second ECU was discovered behind the seat. That ECU controlled the automatic transmission for the vehicle.

In the interim, we had discovered that the truck did not have to be running to cause interference. With the radio receiver set to receive at 159.270MHz, just turning on the ignition switch would cause an intermittent carrier to be heard in the radio receiver. Of course, the CTCSS squelch system had to be bypassed by removing the microphone from the hook or pressing the monitor button. While holding the sniffer probe near the automatic transmission ECU, and turning on the switch, many spurious signals could be seen on the spectrum analyzer. We had found the source of the interference.

The severity of the problem was determined by using a test setup as shown in Figure 3 above.The test procedure is:

1)Set the signal generator to the receiver frequency, and with the truck switch turned off, set the signal generator to 3kHz deviation at 1kHz and adjust the generator level to produce 12dB sinad on the sinad meter. Record the signal generatorlevel in dBm.

2) Start the engine. Increase the signal generator level to return the sinad meter reading to 12dB. Record the new signal generator level.

3) The difference between the signal generator level in steps 1 and 2 is equal to the amount of degradation caused by the interference.

In this particular case, the interference was causing 19dB to 20dB of degradation. This level of interference could not be tolerated by our radio system, so some remedy had to be found. Because this automatic transmission was an Allison World Transmission model, we decided to contact Allison for assistance in solving the problem. After several communications back and forth, it was decided to try a couple of different ECUs in the truck to see if any improvement resulted. This was done by Allison at one of their local service facilities. We were requested to run our test to see what, if any, improvement resulted from the different ECUs being installed.

The two ECUs were set at different operating frequencies. One was at 7.996MHz and the other was at 8.004MHz. The Allison service representative installed first one, then the other, ECU as we tested for results using the previously described test procedure. Tests were run at 159.270MHz, 154.130MHz and 151.400MHz. The interference at 159.270MHz was always the most severe, even with the newer ECUs. However, the amount of degradation dropped from 19dB-20dB to about 6dB. Although this was still undesirable, it represented progress. Maybe 2dB to 3dB would be tolerable, but not 6dB.

The service representatives at the Allison service center are currently working with the manufacturer of the ECU to reduce the interference to a tolerable level. The work is still ongoing, and the ultimate solution is yet to be found. I will pass along information on the final solution when it is reached. A newer International truck, with a similar transmission and an ECU made by the same manufacturer, was tested and found to produce only minimal interference.

Problems such as these require the manufacturer’s cooperation to arrive at an effective solution. Without such cooperation, the probability of a successful outcome would be low. Even with full and unswerving cooperation, the solution is not easy.

Because of more and more EMC problems, I have advised our fleet manager to put something in the specifications to include the effects of electromagnetic interference (EMI) to our radio system (and from our system). Because more electronic devices are being added to vehicles, the problem is sure to get even worse in the future. The EMC problem is best handled at design time, rather than trying to find solutions after units are manufactured and sold to unsuspecting users. When buying such equipment, be aware of such problems and if possible, test one of your system radios in an actual vehicle under typical operating conditions before purchasing the vehicle.

A complaint from one of our county rangers was: “My windshield wipers start up when I key the transmitter on one of the repeater channels.” In order to get to the electronics that controls the wipers, I removed a portion of the dash panel. As I was preparing to set that portion of the dash panel aside, I noticed that the mini-UHF coax connector on the radio was hanging by the center pin. The shield of the plug was not even making contact with the radio connector. Yet, the radio had been working well enough that the user had no complaint about the radio operation.

Because the shield was not connected, I immediately thought this might be the problem causing the wipers to start up when the radio transmitter was keyed. To check, I simply connected the coax connector firmly to the radio and tested for the result. Bingo-that was it. Such a simple solution for such a seemingly complex problem. I had seen this type of connector get loose before and cause other symptoms such as a loud buzz in the broadcast radio in the vehicle. This is the type of thing that should be checked first.

Until next time-stay tuned!

Tags: content

Most Recent


  • Electromagnetic compatibility vs. mobile radio installations
    Newscan: Securing the Internet of Things is quite a challenge
    Also: EWA requests dismissal of 900 MHz applications; TIA names tech and policy priorities for 2014; IJIS Institute names Shumate Award winner; App makes bus waits more tolerable; a Blackberry comeback may be in the offing.
  • Electromagnetic compatibility vs. mobile radio installations
    Newscan: FCC certifies Carlson Wireless's white-space radio
    Also: Congress looks to revamp telecom law; Obama to place some restraints on surveillance; IEEE to study spectrum-occupancy sensing for white-spaces broadband; Major Swedish transport operator opts for Sepura TETRA radios; RFMD to partner on $70 million next-generation power grid project; NENA opens registratiuon for "911 Goes to Washington."
  • Electromagnetic compatibility vs. mobile radio installations
    Newscan: A look at the critical job of 911 dispatchers
    Also: NYC launches website for tracking 911 response times; Oregon implements 911 on pre-paid cell phones; LightSquared wants to keep spectrum assets; Harris receives multiple government orders; FCC extends rebanding financial reconciliation deadline; Zetron gear at core of communications system upgrade; Ritron debuts wireless access control system; EWA seeks policy review of VHF vehicular repeater system deployments.
  • Electromagnetic compatibility vs. mobile radio installations
    Newscan: Average peak data rates of 144 MB/s average realized in tests with CAT 4 LTE device
    Also: Verizon, T-Mobile to swap unused spectrum to improve coverage; Internet giants oppose surveillance--but only when the government does it; FCC Chairman says incentive auction will be delayed until middle of 2015; FCC chair announces staff appointments; Alcatel-Lucent names Tim Krause as chief marketing officer; New Jersey county deploys TriTech CAD system; Toronto airport deploys 26-position Zetron console system;

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision
  • Photo gallery: 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson
  • Electromagnetic compatibility vs. mobile radio installations
    Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
  • Electromagnetic compatibility vs. mobile radio installations
    RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium

Commentary


LTE and liability: Why the fire service must move forward with digital incident command

  • 2
6th May 2022

Partnership and collaboration must be the foundation for emergency communications

18th April 2022

FirstNet success means no hypothetical ‘shots’ need to be fired, Swenson says

22nd February 2022
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Newscan: DHS tests new tech that could bring emergency alerts to vehicle screens dlvr.it/SWpYTv

17th August 2022
UrgentComm

Connectivity Made Simple for Emergency Response dlvr.it/SWpMJF

17th August 2022
UrgentComm

Intelsat, OneWeb team on in-flight connectivity dlvr.it/SWgYb2

15th August 2022
UrgentComm

Black Hat 2022: Adapting to the growing cyberthreat landscape dlvr.it/SWgF3Y

15th August 2022
UrgentComm

Diffusing the connected car’s ticking data-privacy timebomb dlvr.it/SWdCw2

14th August 2022
UrgentComm

Patch madness: Vendor bug advisories are broken, so broken dlvr.it/SWcvFR

14th August 2022
UrgentComm

What the 6 GHz band might mean to fixed-wireless access dlvr.it/SWctfk

14th August 2022
UrgentComm

FirstNet PTT technical progress highlighted by AT&T at APCO 2022 dlvr.it/SWZtNJ

13th August 2022

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X