https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • WHY ATTEND
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Registration Opens April 2019-Join Our Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


Shifting tides at the top

Shifting tides at the top

A few months ago, FCC Commissioner Michael Powell spoke before an industry group and announced his belief that the FCC sometimes improperly regulates
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st July 1998

A few months ago, FCC Commissioner Michael Powell spoke before an industry group and announced his belief that the FCC sometimes improperly regulates all businesses as though each were the size of a regional Bell company. Powell suggested that such regulatory tactics were wrong and did not reflect the entirety of the industry.

Within that speech laid a glimmer of hope for small businesses and minority-run start-ups that have struggled against the policy of “bigger is better,” the mantra-on-sampler revered by the past Reed Hundt administration. Although Hundt believed that all telecommunications services might be delivered by no more that six competing entities, small businesses railed against this heretic to true competition.

At the core of this running debate is the definition of “competition.” This one word and the implications its definition has in the creation of regulation is of paramount importance in determining the future of our industry. Stripped to the bone, the debate is a struggle for the soul of the FCC, which resonates from the commissioners’ combined vision of the paths that lead to competition in the marketplace.

Recently, in his dissenting statement within Docket 98-56 regarding future regulation of Operations Support Systems, Commissioner Harold Furchgott-Roth said, “… for most of the past century, regulators, rather than consumers, made choices both about who may enter a market and about the terms and conditions of commerce. And regulators practically always chose a single provider, no competition and narrowly regulated terms and conditions. Even where competition and private contracts were viable, regulators often insisted on using regulation rather than contract to manage transactions in telecommunications markets.”

The good commissioner thus joined his colleague, Commissioner Powell, in suggesting that the telecommunications industry lacks the zeal and blood of true competition, that market entry is too restrictive and that the agency should simply get out of the way.

Regulatory litmus test

Having published this mini-manifesto, Commissioner Furchgott-Roth may be called on to demonstrate the will behind his words. It is one thing to claim to be a supporter of free markets. It is another to resist the strength of huge companies that lobby, cajole, contribute to politicians, accept positions of power within cabinets and run rings around the antitrust division of the U.S. Department of Justice.

For example, can one both support the auction of radio spectrum and be an avowed believer in free-market competition? The answer is no. Auctions are, by their nature, anticompetitive, as they favor the rich over the poor, the well-financed over the well-intentioned and the established over the new. In holding auctions of spectrum at every turn, the agency has opted for less, not more, opportunity and competition by regulating the number, size, construction schedule and more, of any participant.

Can one support mandatory frequency migration and still claim a kinship with free-market ideals? Again, the answer is no. If left alone, the market would create private contracts for any migration that is deemed essential for the delivery of serv-ices. Arms-length negotiation would perform what the agen cy’s arm-twisting regulation seeks.

Can Commissioner Furchgott-Roth cling to his published ideals and still support licensing of radio systems employing geographic boundaries? Still, the answer appears to be no. County boundaries do not reflect consumer-demanded system configurations. They are, instead, arbitrary lines on a map employed simply for the ease of agency administration. Therefore, such licensing fails the good commissioner’s articulated test.

Finally, does a free-market approach support the granting of licenses across huge blocks of spectrum for undefined, unconstructed, unformulated services? One would be hard-pressed to answer in the affirmative. The FCC has long demonstrated disdain for spectrum warehousing, and recent licensing of large frequency blocks fully demonstrates the valid basis for the agency’s long-held position. When spectrum is reduced to a commodity for trade among the richest companies, it serves as bait for investors rather than as the stuff from which serv-ices to the public are made.

Consumer as king

There is more than a hint in Commissioner Furchgott-Roth’s statements that the consumer should be the ultimate decision maker as to which services should continue to be provided. He stated in his opinion “… in the best of worlds, consumers-by selecting higher quality services at lower prices from among competing providers-decide which businesses may enter and survive in a market and which may not.” Yet, is the consumer being given the right to make this decision?

The existence of auctions as the preferred licensing method restricts from the outset the number and type of providers that will compete for consumer dollars. The cost paid at auction is passed on to the consumer. An accelerated construction schedule for those services further raises the cost of providing services. The net result is that consumers are made to bear the cost of an overregulated, over-allocated service in fees and charges.

Providers are encouraged to bring only the most advanced, multitask, interconnected services to the market to justify high airtime billing and usage charges, thus reducing the market’s suppliers of bread in favor of suppliers of fancy cake. Therefore, the competition among cake providers is increasing, while bread lines are forming for basic services.

Although the FCC’s rhetoric has focused on its efforts to increase the high-end serv-ices marketplace, the Commission’s public self-congratulations have ignored the concurrent effect on providers of basic paging, two-way, dispatch and telephone services on which the vast majority of the American public continues to rely.

For competition

If Commissioners Powell and Furchgott-Roth are sincere in their reservations regarding the direction of the Commission and its all-too-dynamic definition of “competition,” then licensees and operators might expect a change in the regulatory tides. Although the regulatory currents have been strong upon the rocky shoals that tear the tiny boats of small operators and consumers, an undertow of regulatory restraint might have begun.

It could be that “competition” among all operators might be promoted in the future. One might discover greater market access being created, less arbitrary concentration of spectrum and market share, and a reduction in emphasis on FCC administrative efficiency as a justification for increased burdens on licensees. Two commissioners are beginning to explore these vital issues. It only takes one more to make a majority.

Tags: content

Related


  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision
    As one of the leading international developers and manufacturers of rugged mobile phones, smartphones and tablets for professional use in extreme safety and working conditions RugGear is becoming an increasingly important player in the field of mission critical communications. With our high-performance mission critical flagship product RG760 we are proud to contribute to the future […]
  • Photo gallery: 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson
    This photo gallery features scenes from the 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson, Ariz.
  • Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
    Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
    Here’s a look at the most popular stories on IWCE’s Urgent Communications from the last week.
  • RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium
    RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium
    Recent presentations, given by both startups and major corporations, have included fractal antennas, LTE, emergency communications, "invisibility cloaks" using RF, disabling IEDs with RF and tropospheric ducting.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Newscan: Indiana 911 dispatch-center deadline looms
  • Newscan: Texting 911 becomes an option for some Pennylvania cell-phone users
  • Newscan: Senator wants inventory of government spectrum
  • CMA conducts 40th conference this week

Commentary


Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiator

7th April 2021

Ransomware? Let’s call it what it really is: extortionware

21st February 2021

Redefining communications for today’s mobile workforces

18th February 2021
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Newscan: Single sign-in for government services expands to states, localities dlvr.it/RxLQNR

9th April 2021
UrgentComm

‘Life-saving technology’: AST SpaceMobile CEO outlines capabilities of direct-to-smartphone LEO satellite service dlvr.it/RxKqvp

9th April 2021
UrgentComm

Handcuffs over AI: Solving security challenges with law enforcement dlvr.it/RxGtpD

8th April 2021
UrgentComm

Fujistsu: Cyber cretins are casing out private 5G dlvr.it/RxGnfN

8th April 2021
UrgentComm

Faster in-vehicle Wi-Fi dependent on faster connectivity dlvr.it/RxGnZL

8th April 2021
UrgentComm

Digital-health infrastructure benefits from cloud-to-edge architecture dlvr.it/RxFcjx

8th April 2021
UrgentComm

All actions monitored: The 10 most surveilled major cities in the U.S. dlvr.it/RxFZHV

8th April 2021
UrgentComm

Unlocking the power of ESInets: Different NG911 provisioning approaches exist; level of control is key differentiat… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

7th April 2021

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X