https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • Microwave/RF
    • T&D World
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


PCS: A threat to SMR?

PCS: A threat to SMR?

Will hungry, start-up, PCS companies gobble up SMR customer bases by offering multiple services? The smart SMR operator will see an immediate opportunity
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st September 1998

Will hungry, start-up, PCS companies gobble up SMR customer bases by offering multiple services? The smart SMR operator will see an immediate opportunity in many market areas-particularly in one area not usually seen as a potential for radio system owners.

Rapid changes in recent years within the communications industry have some SMR business owners looking over their shoulder at increased competition. That competition was first expected to come, at least potentially, from major telecommunication providers. However, changes in federal regulations and within the telecommunications industry may have created more opportunities for SMR system operators than competitors-at least in some markets. Here is a quick look at some key history and recent regulatory changes, their effects on the industry and potential new opportunities for SMR system operators.

Prior to 1974, the Bell system owned or operated most of the mobile telephone service market. The LMR systems in service were owned by the user/operator/licensee. When Congress created the specialized mobile radio (SMR) service in 1974, the new service (and spectrum) was divided to keep telephony providers and more conventional radio service providers well apart in the realm of business competition. The cellular and SMR services were created to serve different groups of users, to create opportunity for new business growth and to reduce the cost of dispatch-type services for small business operations. The key difference was the classification of the SMR operator as “private” and the cellular operator as “common” carriers, with different levels of federal and state regulation and oversight.

The success of SMR trunking systems led the FCC to change the rules in 1982 and again in 1983, opening the way for services such as wide-area paging and the use of new frequency bands by private carriers. The growth and success of both services indicates how well the business community was served by the changes. Today, almost 80% of SMR subscribers use the service for their business dispatch needs.

This change within the communications (radio) industry was, in some ways, almost invisible to the general public. At the same time, greater changes were altering the landscape for telecommunications (wireline) providers. The breakup of the Bell operating system into regional bell operating companies (RBOCs) in 1984, and the growth of companies such as MCI and Sprint, forever changed how people would communicate. What effect did these changes have on SMR operators? Little, until 1993.

By 1993, changes in technology, marketplace conditions and delivery of interconnection service had been described as a “technology convergence.” This blurring of service and technology was a driving force behind the amendment of the Communications Act of 1934 and the reclassification of all land mobile services as either private mobile radio service (PMRS) or as commercial mobile radio service (CMRS). At once, all operators that provided third-party interconnection to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) were classified as “common carriers” and were regulated as such. If that wasn’t enough, the personal communications service (PCS) was created. Not much occurred with PCS initially, as technology choice issues, similar to those faced by the infant SMR industry, slowed growth.

The stalemate was broken, in part, when the telecommunications industry was hit with another major change in 1996. Now local exchange carriers (LECs) were allowed to offer long distance connections, and interexchange carriers (IXCs) could enter the local access market. This change, coupled with spectrum auctions and the high prices paid for that spectrum, had observers in the SMR industry worried. Would hungry, start-up, PCS companies gobble up SMR customer bases by offering multiple services? Could SMRs compete with huge, rich, RBOC-run systems, or would the RBOCs simply purchase existing SMR systems under the new rules?

The complete fallout has yet to be determined, but the smart SMR operator will see some immediate opportunities. One lies in the wireless replacement of the traditional copper “local loop” for the new competitive local exchange carrier (C-LEC) providers in local communities, especially in areas with low population density. Not all PCS license holders want to compete head-to-head with established cellular providers and limit their use of PCS technology to a single-service delivery system.

As new C-LEC providers start operations, they face several choices for access to their potential customer base. First, they could lease this access from the incumbent local exchange carrier (I-LEC) in the form of the embedded, copper-based, outside plant. This is a large monthly cost to a start-up company, and most I-LECs have fought tooth-and-nail to avoid leasing. Issues over interconnection standards, methods of interconnection, maintenance costs and right-of-way concerns further cloud the issue.

Second, a new C-LEC could build its own outside plant, but regulators frown on this, unless transmission is through fiber-optic cable or a combination of fiber-optic and coaxial cable (hybrid fiber-coax) that offers large bandwidth capacity to the customer. Even if this is considered, the cost to bring service to customers demands a high-density potential customer base and a desire to offer multiple services such as telephony, Internet access, entertainment or security. Right-of-way issues can still cause problems.

Third, a new C-LEC could purchase a PCS license and build a wireless system to provide local access. In many markets, many start-up companies choose to do this. Unfortunately, the auction process forced the price of spectrum so high that many companies could not fund both the cost of new equipment and a license. Further complications in the form of competing PCS technologies (GSM, TDMA, CDMA, PACS and others) can slow the growth of new C-LEC providers. Why? Until this technology issue settles out, many business customers are reluctant to purchase new subscriber equipment or services-especially if they travel extensively and require roaming support.

Where does this leave the SMR provider? New C-LEC providers might find SMR-based local access attractive, especially for areas with low customer density. It also offers a quick way to ramp up their cash flow with new customers, if the I-LEC has been extremely recalcitrant on local access wholesale leasing.

What is the payback to the system operator? The potential in partnering with a new C-LEC could provide significantly reduced interconnection charges, access to new customers, and the opportunity for enough new traffic revenue to support new growth or equipment in the system. Even a simple reselling agreement (wholesale) has the potential to increase business significantly while reducing the threat of additional immediate competition. The C-LEC, in turn, sees an established service with a known technology and proven performance-and less incentive to purchase their own system, at least in the near term.

The telephony business is significantly different from what SMR providers may have dealt with in the past. It has it’s own set of business expectations, paradigms for customer service and maintenance philosophy. This doesn’t make it impossible to deal with these companies, you just have to do your homework. In fact, many of the new C-LECs are successful because their “corporate culture” significantly differs from the old Bell system.

References

Calhoun, George C., Wireless Access and the Local Telephone Network, Artech House, Boston, 1992.

Freeman, Roger L., Telecommunication System Engineering, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 1996.

Reeve, Whitham D., Subscriber Loop Signaling and Transmission Handbook: Analog, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1992.

Reeve, Whitham D., Subscriber Loop Signaling and Transmission Handbook: Digital, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1995.

Web references

On the World Wide Web, use the keywords “local loop,” “CLEC,” “wireless.”

Applicable sites include www.clecinfo.com, www.bellcore.com and www.fcc.gov.

An exceptional site is www.nortel.com. It has excellent tutorials, particularly “Telephony 101,” “Long Distance 101” and “SONET 101.”

Tags: content

Most Recent


  • PCS: A threat to SMR?
    Newscan: Securing the Internet of Things is quite a challenge
    Also: EWA requests dismissal of 900 MHz applications; TIA names tech and policy priorities for 2014; IJIS Institute names Shumate Award winner; App makes bus waits more tolerable; a Blackberry comeback may be in the offing.
  • PCS: A threat to SMR?
    Newscan: FCC certifies Carlson Wireless's white-space radio
    Also: Congress looks to revamp telecom law; Obama to place some restraints on surveillance; IEEE to study spectrum-occupancy sensing for white-spaces broadband; Major Swedish transport operator opts for Sepura TETRA radios; RFMD to partner on $70 million next-generation power grid project; NENA opens registratiuon for "911 Goes to Washington."
  • PCS: A threat to SMR?
    Newscan: A look at the critical job of 911 dispatchers
    Also: NYC launches website for tracking 911 response times; Oregon implements 911 on pre-paid cell phones; LightSquared wants to keep spectrum assets; Harris receives multiple government orders; FCC extends rebanding financial reconciliation deadline; Zetron gear at core of communications system upgrade; Ritron debuts wireless access control system; EWA seeks policy review of VHF vehicular repeater system deployments.
  • PCS: A threat to SMR?
    Newscan: Average peak data rates of 144 MB/s average realized in tests with CAT 4 LTE device
    Also: Verizon, T-Mobile to swap unused spectrum to improve coverage; Internet giants oppose surveillance--but only when the government does it; FCC Chairman says incentive auction will be delayed until middle of 2015; FCC chair announces staff appointments; Alcatel-Lucent names Tim Krause as chief marketing officer; New Jersey county deploys TriTech CAD system; Toronto airport deploys 26-position Zetron console system;

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision
  • Photo gallery: 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson
  • PCS: A threat to SMR?
    Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
  • PCS: A threat to SMR?
    RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium

Commentary


LTE and liability: Why the fire service must move forward with digital incident command

  • 2
6th May 2022

Partnership and collaboration must be the foundation for emergency communications

18th April 2022

FirstNet success means no hypothetical ‘shots’ need to be fired, Swenson says

22nd February 2022
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

Polaris Wireless: Manlio Allegra talks 911 Z-axis tech, future IoT opportunities dlvr.it/ST1384

28th June 2022
UrgentComm

Biden’s net-neutrality strategy looks doomed dlvr.it/SSyQ7d

28th June 2022
UrgentComm

Only 3% of open-source software bugs are actually attackable, researchers say dlvr.it/SSxjxK

27th June 2022
UrgentComm

Cabinless self-driving trucks get the green light dlvr.it/SSxghf

27th June 2022
UrgentComm

Autonomous vehicles in slow lane as robots accelerate dlvr.it/SSxPDQ

27th June 2022
UrgentComm

Southern Linc official discusses MCPTT migration, interoperability with new partner Catalyst dlvr.it/SSr8VD

25th June 2022
UrgentComm

Newscan: NYPD’s bomb-sniffing dogs get a high-tech upgrade to keep city safe dlvr.it/SSpSD1

25th June 2022
UrgentComm

Chinese APT group likely using ransomware attacks as cover for IP theft dlvr.it/SSmJNm

24th June 2022

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • Microwave/RF
  • T&D World
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X