https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


Putting Project 25 to the test

Putting Project 25 to the test

To reap the advantages of multiple sourcing under an open standard, public safety systems operatorsand technicians will require broader testing capabilities.As
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st August 2000

To reap the advantages of multiple sourcing under an open standard, public safety systems operatorsand technicians will require broader testing capabilities.

As the deployment of Project 25 systems gathers momentum, the requirement for system-specific test equipment is becoming apparent. Measurements that need to be made at the air interface during deployment and operation of a Project 25 system require new measurement technology. Additionally, the open standard raises the issue of interoperability among equipment purchased from different sources. Interoperability problems can be minimized with appropriate test strategies.

New testing challenges Operators and maintenance technicians are focusing considerable attention on the implications of the Project 25 standard for their support and maintenance programs. Because interoperability and maximization of radio spectrum efficiency are fundamental requirements, Phase I of Project 25 uses digital voice encoding to reduce the required bandwidth for speech transmission to 12.5kHz, while simultaneously maintaining backward compatibility and interoperation with the existing 25kHz analog FM systems. Supporting both digital and analog testing, although common in the cellular world, is a new requirement in the public safety communications environment.

Traditional test strategies have primarily focused on the parametric performance of the radio terminal, where measurements such as power, frequency, modulation and sensitivity are the primary indicators of performance. The open-standard concept adopted for Project 25 introduces some new variables into the testing equation that relate to the interoperability of equipment sourced from multiple manufacturers supporting the standard.

The Project 25 standard, like its analog predecessors, is based on a frequency-domain multiple-access (FDMA) system, and it produces continuous signals when the radio is keyed. Therefore, some of the more complex measurement techniques required for time-domain multiple-access (TDMA) systems, such as Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA), are simplified. The significant differences occur in modulation and sensitivity measurements.

A new approach The modulation selected for Project 25 is C4FM, which is a modified, four-level, frequency-shift keying (FSK), with a raised cosine filter for minimizing intersymbol interference. The modulation can be measured using conventional techniques as long as standard test signals are used. These signals are designed to provide a data stream of all low-deviation symbols or all high-deviation symbols, thus enabling the high 61.8kHz and the low 60.6kHz deviations to be measured. This is not practical on a working transmitter because the data content cannot be controlled without removing the transmitter from service, so a new measurement technique has to be used. This requires sampling the transmitted signal and demodulating the data. The demodulated data are used to compute the instantaneous deviation from a “perfect” modulator. This deviation is then compared with the actual measured deviation value, and a root-mean-square (RMS) error magnitude is calculated. This error is expressed as a percent age from the perfect s

Bit-error rate measurement Receiver sensitivity for digital systems is measured by determining the bit-error rate (BER), which is defined as the number of bits received in error expressed as a percentage of the total number of bits received. This measurement is not quite as simple as it sounds because it depends on where the measurement is taken within a given radio system. Of the total throughput of a Project 25 channel of 9,600bps, only 4,400bps are associated with the digital voice. Of the remainder, 2,800bps are used for error correction of the voice signal and 2,400bps are devoted to signaling overhead. The question arises: Do you measure the errors before or after correction? Obviously, it is the corrected performance that is important to the user because this determines the intelligibility of the speech. To overcome the uncertainty of this measurement, a test signal with a known bit pattern is defined. A BER compares the received signal with the expected test signal. Nominal BER for a Project 25 receiver is 5%.

An alternative measurement of receiver sensitivity is a recorded speech pattern, which gives an audible indication. Because of the large amount of error correction used, its failure point occurs abruptly, so sensitivity measurements are accurate.

Additional measurements are specified, such as adjacent channel power and emission spectrum, to ensure that Project 25 equipment does not interfere with, or degrade the performance of, equipment on co-existent analog channels.

Although these measurements are important to overall system integrity, they are not commonly used for routine system maintenance. They also require performance levels that are only obtainable with specialized test equipment.

How interoperability impacts testing Although the open standard creates many benefits for the user in the long term (i.e., reduced equipment costs and greater customer choice), it does introduce another uncertainty: Will the equipment from different suppliers work together seamlessly?

The standardization process is designed to create a standard that defines all aspects of the system operation. It is possible however, that equipment suppliers will interpret the standard in differing ways. This may result in a terminal from one manufacturer and a repeater from another not interoperating as expected. Additionally, as new features become available on a system and the equipment is updated, the need to reassess interoperability may occur. This will gain in significance as the number of compliant-equipment manufacturers increases.

Two test strategies can be used to determine interoperability. The first method is to test each new equipment type with all of the existing equipment used in the network. Obviously, not all of the terminal features on all of the user channels can be tested because the testing time would escalate rapidly. If the number of units in a system is large, even basic interoperability tests would require a tremendous number of combinations. This approach ensures that the equipment will interoperate, but it does not guarantee adherence to the standard-nor does it necessarily indicate which equipment is non-compliant.

An alternative approach is to check all equipment against a reference system or device. If it were practical to use only one reference system for all tests, then this system would itself become the standard. Typically, a radio test set could be used as the reference, but, again, this is based on one manufacturer’s interpretation of the standard. Also, the number of functions that can be tested is limited by the reference system capability. This method significantly reduces the number of tests required, but interoperability will only be implied-not guaranteed.

Test equipment for a robust standard A radio test set provides the tools required to maintain radio systems. Traditionally, these instruments have provided sufficient control of the device-under-test (DUT) for parametric measurements to be made in a normal system environment. Project 25’s emphasis on interoperability raises the capability threshold in two significant ways. First, it requires the test set to provide a comprehensive simulation of the radio system and to analyze the data it receives back from the DUT. A system parameter measurement screen is shown in Figure 2 above. Second, the user must be enabled to configure the test set to accurately represent the system being operated.

Reaping the benefits of a standard Adoption of Project 25 will require radio systems operators and maintenance technicians to revisit their testing capabilities. Accurate testing of equipment offered by a variety of competing manufacturers will enable public safety users to use the open standard to its fullest advantage. n

Tags: content

Most Recent


  • Putting Project 25 to the test
    Newscan: Securing the Internet of Things is quite a challenge
    Also: EWA requests dismissal of 900 MHz applications; TIA names tech and policy priorities for 2014; IJIS Institute names Shumate Award winner; App makes bus waits more tolerable; a Blackberry comeback may be in the offing.
  • Putting Project 25 to the test
    Newscan: FCC certifies Carlson Wireless's white-space radio
    Also: Congress looks to revamp telecom law; Obama to place some restraints on surveillance; IEEE to study spectrum-occupancy sensing for white-spaces broadband; Major Swedish transport operator opts for Sepura TETRA radios; RFMD to partner on $70 million next-generation power grid project; NENA opens registratiuon for "911 Goes to Washington."
  • Putting Project 25 to the test
    Newscan: A look at the critical job of 911 dispatchers
    Also: NYC launches website for tracking 911 response times; Oregon implements 911 on pre-paid cell phones; LightSquared wants to keep spectrum assets; Harris receives multiple government orders; FCC extends rebanding financial reconciliation deadline; Zetron gear at core of communications system upgrade; Ritron debuts wireless access control system; EWA seeks policy review of VHF vehicular repeater system deployments.
  • Putting Project 25 to the test
    Newscan: Average peak data rates of 144 MB/s average realized in tests with CAT 4 LTE device
    Also: Verizon, T-Mobile to swap unused spectrum to improve coverage; Internet giants oppose surveillance--but only when the government does it; FCC Chairman says incentive auction will be delayed until middle of 2015; FCC chair announces staff appointments; Alcatel-Lucent names Tim Krause as chief marketing officer; New Jersey county deploys TriTech CAD system; Toronto airport deploys 26-position Zetron console system;

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision
  • Photo gallery: 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson
  • Putting Project 25 to the test
    Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
  • Putting Project 25 to the test
    RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

How AT&T won DFW Airport’s $10 million private 5G business dlvr.it/Spj4Pt

27th May 2023
UrgentComm

Russia’s war in Ukraine shows cyberattacks can be war crimes dlvr.it/Spj3c2

27th May 2023
UrgentComm

FCC grants 700 MHz Band 14 license renewal to FirstNet Authority dlvr.it/Spj2Ny

27th May 2023
UrgentComm

Broadband for Critical Communications Everywhere Providing Connectivity When Seconds Count dlvr.it/Sph602

26th May 2023
UrgentComm

How vehicle insurance and autonomy intertwined dlvr.it/SpglBb

26th May 2023
UrgentComm

World’s least-expensive self-driving vehicle revealed dlvr.it/Spgc88

26th May 2023
UrgentComm

Voice calling is finally making its way onto 5G dlvr.it/SpdtYW

26th May 2023
UrgentComm

With many cities facing a fiscal cliff as ARPA funding ends, debt ceiling debate continues on Capitol Hill dlvr.it/Spdsnq

26th May 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.