https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


What’s the TETRA and Project 25 flap all about?

What’s the TETRA and Project 25 flap all about?

Hardly anyone who has something to do with public safety communications agrees about anything when it comes to TETRA's features and capabilities vs. those
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st October 2000

Hardly anyone who has something to do with public safety communications agrees about anything when it comes to TETRA’s features and capabilities vs. those of Project 25, the definition of “interoperability,” the standards-setting process, and who has to license TETRA intellectual property rights and why and when and for what. Ready? Let’s begin:

The “Project 25” U.S. standard for public safety digital radio may be the best chance to achieve interoperability among federal, state and local jurisdictions for services that protect life and property.

Interoperability is so important that some detest the idea that at this late date TETRA, a competing digital technology from Europe, might enter the field if it isn’t modified for interoperability – whether some potential users want it modified or not.

Interoperability proponents have federal support. The FCC may require the use of Project 25 equipment in the new 700MHz public safety band.

European interoperability Europe can achieve public safety and commercial interoperability throughout the continent on its new private mobile radio service band (380MHz-400MHz) and its commercial mobile radio service band (410MHz-430MHz), among other frequencies. The fastest-growing inter-operable systems use a European standard originally called Trans-European Trunked Radio and renamed as Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA). Yet, a competing, non-compliant digital technology has won 500,000 users in Europe and elsewhere, and it is not interoperable with TETRA. More about that later.

Some European governments interpret a European Union Treaty provision as requiring them to deploy only TETRA. In 1996, the United Kingdom’s Home Office limited bids for its national police and emergency service network to TETRA suppliers. It awarded the $2.1 billion contract to British Telecom.

Matra Nortel, the French manufacturer of TETRAPOL, the competing and similarly named – though fundamentally different – digital technology, is challenging the exclusive procurement of TETRA and has some support from the European Commission. Matra Nortel argues that TETRAPOL’s frequency-division, multiple-access (FDMA) technology is “equivalent” to the TETRA standard. As such, the company argues that government contractors must evaluate their tenders or they would breach European Union Treaty rules on the free movement of goods and services.

Despite separate European and U.S. decisions that favor interoperability with home-grown standards, some European manufacturers want the North American market opened up.

The interesting twist to all of this involves the different performance and capacity of time-division, multiple-access (TDMA) and FDMA technologies. TETRA is TDMA; Project 25 (Phase I) and TETRAPOL are FDMA.

Europe is more densely populated than the United States. It has few areas of sparse population as compared to our western states. Most of its public safety agencies, especially police departments, are organized into larger departments at federal and state levels. It doesn’t have the many small municipal departments (those with only a few officers) that are common in this country.

This difference is important because a persuasive case has been made that FDMA serves small user groups and sparsely populated areas better, in part because it can be implemented with fewer channels when a small system fits the need. TETRA produces the equivalent of four channels in a 25kHz bandwidth as a minimum. Its infrastructure may require more sites for equivalent coverage to FDMA. TETRA reuses frequencies in multisite networks (and thus, might need more frequencies), either reducing the need for simulcast or compensating for its inability to simulcast, depending on how you look at it.

Which is better – and why? According to an older report written by an ETSI working group, for fewer than 10 channels per site and wide-area coverage, FDMA is superior. For more than 15 channels per site and limited area coverage, TDMA is superior. Even so, systems with few channels and increasingly sophisticated data applications could benefit from TETRA’s ability to aggregate, on demand, four time-slots for 28.8kbps “high-speed” data capability.

Some U.S. jurisdictions are densely populated and have large public safety agencies. Several European-based manufacturers want to offer TETRA to them.

These manufacturers want to serve U.S. commercial users, too. TETRA was designed with public safety and commercial users in mind; Project 25 was not.

TETRA can be modified to fit Project 25’s Phase II 6.25kHz-and-equivalent narrowband standard. Committees involved with the standard have begun working on the modification. Commercial users don’t need the modification.

Manufacturers would rather not modify their products, in part because it will raise the price. The difference in price between FDMA and TDMA products is expected to be a key selling point.

With respect to public safety, it will come down to individual agencies making their own radio communications system procurement decisions based on what’s most important to their operations. If some forgo interoperability, it will be despite every effort being spent to make it available.

Tags: content

Most Recent


  • What’s the TETRA and Project 25 flap all about?
    Newscan: Securing the Internet of Things is quite a challenge
    Also: EWA requests dismissal of 900 MHz applications; TIA names tech and policy priorities for 2014; IJIS Institute names Shumate Award winner; App makes bus waits more tolerable; a Blackberry comeback may be in the offing.
  • What’s the TETRA and Project 25 flap all about?
    Newscan: FCC certifies Carlson Wireless's white-space radio
    Also: Congress looks to revamp telecom law; Obama to place some restraints on surveillance; IEEE to study spectrum-occupancy sensing for white-spaces broadband; Major Swedish transport operator opts for Sepura TETRA radios; RFMD to partner on $70 million next-generation power grid project; NENA opens registratiuon for "911 Goes to Washington."
  • What’s the TETRA and Project 25 flap all about?
    Newscan: A look at the critical job of 911 dispatchers
    Also: NYC launches website for tracking 911 response times; Oregon implements 911 on pre-paid cell phones; LightSquared wants to keep spectrum assets; Harris receives multiple government orders; FCC extends rebanding financial reconciliation deadline; Zetron gear at core of communications system upgrade; Ritron debuts wireless access control system; EWA seeks policy review of VHF vehicular repeater system deployments.
  • What’s the TETRA and Project 25 flap all about?
    Newscan: Average peak data rates of 144 MB/s average realized in tests with CAT 4 LTE device
    Also: Verizon, T-Mobile to swap unused spectrum to improve coverage; Internet giants oppose surveillance--but only when the government does it; FCC Chairman says incentive auction will be delayed until middle of 2015; FCC chair announces staff appointments; Alcatel-Lucent names Tim Krause as chief marketing officer; New Jersey county deploys TriTech CAD system; Toronto airport deploys 26-position Zetron console system;

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision
  • Photo gallery: 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson
  • What’s the TETRA and Project 25 flap all about?
    Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
  • What’s the TETRA and Project 25 flap all about?
    RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium

Commentary


Better technology can help solve the public-safety staffing crisis

26th June 2023

Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.